Repository navigation
Replies: 15 comments 21 replies
|
hi @nono303 : today i have played with the styles and had some problems:
are the commandline parameters are not working anymore?
next i configure server properties and adjusted the pathes. map folder is ok. but DEM is not. when i outcommenting the DEM line i got the same with the theme file.
my server.properties: |
|
Hi @telemaxx
See https://github.com/nono303/mapsforgesrv/blob/styles/HOWTO.md#configure &
Fyi, my startup log according to my fork config |
|
i tried 1h to get it running. I had a lot of browser windows open, file explorers and so on.
i was always searching the correct window ... ;-) i tried to rename the properties file to i think for most users to complicate. one big problem i see with the TCL script from @JFritzle What do you think? |
|
I think it could be possible to expand the TCL scripts to handle the refactored server using several configuration files too.
But neither of these requirements seem to be realized yet. At least, I didn't figure out how. |
|
I have 2 property files: default.property & elevate.property. Server started without errors. Neither Update: |
|
Hi @JFritzle @telemaxx
|
|
I am currently working on recently cloned @nono303 styles project. What I have essentially done and successfully tested so far:
Update
|
|
Switching server configuration from command line parameters to 1 ore more task properties files, I thought it made sense to watch config folder for new task properties files, for removed task properties files and for modified task properties files in order to reflect these changes in the running server. This will allow my script based GUIs (in the future) to alter configuration parameters without need to stop and restart server. Issue solved: Issue not solved: I am bothered by the last line of output, because to endusers it looks like an uncaught error condition. Update: Issue solved. |
|
Performance comparison between "jetty-threadpool.xml" and "jetty-threadpool-virtual.xml" Test scenario:
Test case 1:
Test case 2:
Test case 3:
Conclusion: |
|
U may have a look at styles...nono303:mapsforgesrv:styles |
|
PR would be good |
|
I have set up a new branch snapshot in my fork.
|
|
Hi @JFritzle, my specifics
might be fixed:to be discussed : |
|
Hi @telemaxx @JFritzle
0.22 0.23 |
|
Hi @telemaxx @JFritzle Out last discussion concluded that given the difference in quality and speed between 1. Speed
2. QualityI've visually benched z7z13z163. Fine tuning against default
|







Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Discussion for styles option.
See PR63
See PR65
See PR66
All reactions