Replies: 2 comments
|
EVERYONE UPVOTE THIS. WE NEED TO PURGE ALL AI-GENERATED CODE FROM THIS PROJECT IMMEDIATELY! |
0 replies
|
Hello! I'm not going to run through the usual script here as these conversations are repetitive. openQ4 heavily utilises agentic AI and wouldn't be possible without it, no matter who would hypothetically be involved. That will not change. It is entirely your call as to what you do with that information, but this conversation is not productive and therefore I am putting an end to it. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I was looking at the contributors list and noticed that Claude and Copilot were listed. Many people online are against the use of large language models (LLMs) and generative AI in source codes due to bugs and issues that often go unnoticed and even unresolved due to developer inexperience, such as security vulnerabilities.
To sum it all up, here's three question that I want to ask: How much of openQ4's code was AI-generated? Did you correct the code Claude provided? and most importantly, what is your reasoning for using Claude in your project?
All reactions