From 0c1f7c5e2c87795f8b7ed76edc0986588dbafb55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sami <278497437+umakarem82@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 10:51:18 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Revise security tool with patch-check and WhatsApp risk
 report

---
 SECURITY_RISK_REPORT.md |  36 +++++++
 security_review_app.py  | 205 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 241 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 SECURITY_RISK_REPORT.md
 create mode 100644 security_review_app.py

diff --git a/SECURITY_RISK_REPORT.md b/SECURITY_RISK_REPORT.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..82698b6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/SECURITY_RISK_REPORT.md
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# Security Risk Review (WhatsApp / Aalto-style account hygiene)
+
+## Scope
+This review is based on the provided screenshots and focuses on account takeover, social-engineering, and privacy leakage risks.
+
+## Key Findings
+1. **Unknown contacts appearing repeatedly** (`Sami ~Sami`) with similar avatars/names indicate possible spoofing or contact poisoning.
+2. **Suspicious contact label** (`_$!<C...`) in the edit screen suggests malformed/obfuscated identity metadata.
+3. **Group administration controls visible** (Make group admin / Remove from group) increase impact if admin rights are assigned to unverified numbers.
+4. **Invite via link or QR code** can expose the group if links are leaked or not rotated.
+5. **Search and media indexing with external/unknown contacts** may increase accidental data sharing.
+
+## Risk Level
+**Overall: MODERATE to HIGH** (depends on whether unknown identities are trusted and whether 2-step verification is enabled).
+
+## Immediate Actions
+- Remove unknown duplicate contacts and block/report suspicious identities.
+- Regenerate group invite links and disable old links after membership cleanup.
+- Restrict admin privileges to verified contacts only.
+- Enable WhatsApp two-step verification and review linked devices.
+- Disable automatic media download from unknown contacts/groups.
+- Export and preserve chat evidence before deleting suspicious accounts if incident response is needed.
+
+## Patch/Code Hygiene Guidance
+Use the `patch-check` mode in `security_review_app.py` to detect suspicious patterns such as:
+- dynamic code execution (`eval`, `exec`)
+- hard-coded secrets/tokens/passwords
+- private key material embedded in source
+
+Example:
+
+```bash
+python3 security_review_app.py patch-check . --json
+```
+
+If findings appear, remove the suspicious code, rotate exposed credentials, and re-run the scan.
diff --git a/security_review_app.py b/security_review_app.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9bf52ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/security_review_app.py
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python3
+"""Security review utility for Chrome, WhatsApp, and Aalto-style mobile apps.
+
+Modes:
+1) interactive review questionnaire with weighted controls
+2) patch-check scan to flag suspicious/non-original code patterns
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import argparse
+import hashlib
+import json
+import re
+from dataclasses import dataclass
+from pathlib import Path
+
+
+@dataclass(frozen=True)
+class Question:
+    text: str
+    weight: int = 1
+
+
+REVIEW_QUESTIONS: dict[str, list[Question]] = {
+    "chrome": [
+        Question("Does the extension request minimum permissions only?", 3),
+        Question("Is remote code execution prevented (no eval, no remote scripts)?", 3),
+        Question("Are content scripts scoped to explicit domains, not <all_urls>?", 2),
+        Question("Is CSP strict and aligned with Manifest V3 best practices?", 2),
+        Question("Are credentials/tokens excluded from local storage?", 2),
+        Question("Are third-party dependencies pinned and frequently updated?", 2),
+    ],
+    "whatsapp": [
+        Question("Are group admin privileges granted only to trusted identities?", 3),
+        Question("Are suspicious contacts (spoof-like names/unknown numbers) blocked quickly?", 3),
+        Question("Are invite links/QR links rotated after membership changes?", 2),
+        Question("Is two-step verification enabled on the account?", 2),
+        Question("Are chat backups encrypted and restricted to trusted storage?", 2),
+        Question("Is media auto-download disabled for unknown contacts/groups?", 2),
+    ],
+    "aalto": [
+        Question("Is authentication protected with MFA and device binding?", 3),
+        Question("Are app secrets excluded from client binaries/logs?", 3),
+        Question("Are API endpoints enforcing least-privilege authorization?", 2),
+        Question("Are input validation and anti-injection controls tested?", 2),
+        Question("Is PII encrypted both at rest and in transit?", 2),
+        Question("Are audit trails immutable and monitored?", 2),
+    ],
+}
+
+SUSPICIOUS_PATTERNS: dict[str, str] = {
+    r"\beval\s*\(": "dynamic code execution via eval",
+    r"exec\s*\(": "dynamic code execution via exec",
+    r"AKIA[0-9A-Z]{16}": "possible AWS access key",
+    r"-----BEGIN (RSA|OPENSSH|EC) PRIVATE KEY-----": "private key material",
+    r"(?i)password\s*=\s*['\"][^'\"]+['\"]": "hard-coded password",
+    r"(?i)token\s*=\s*['\"][^'\"]+['\"]": "hard-coded token",
+}
+
+
+def parse_args() -> argparse.Namespace:
+    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Security review and patch-check utility")
+    sub = parser.add_subparsers(dest="command", required=True)
+
+    review = sub.add_parser("review", help="Run interactive security questionnaire")
+    review.add_argument("target", choices=sorted(REVIEW_QUESTIONS.keys()), help="Review template target")
+    review.add_argument("--json", action="store_true", help="Emit machine-readable JSON report")
+
+    patch = sub.add_parser("patch-check", help="Scan code for suspicious/non-original patterns")
+    patch.add_argument("path", type=Path, help="File or directory to scan")
+    patch.add_argument("--json", action="store_true", help="Emit machine-readable JSON report")
+
+    return parser.parse_args()
+
+
+def ask_boolean(prompt: str) -> bool:
+    while True:
+        answer = input(f"{prompt} [y/n]: ").strip().lower()
+        if answer in {"y", "yes"}:
+            return True
+        if answer in {"n", "no"}:
+            return False
+        print("Please enter y or n.")
+
+
+def grade(score: int, max_score: int) -> str:
+    ratio = score / max_score if max_score else 0
+    if ratio >= 0.85:
+        return "LOW RISK"
+    if ratio >= 0.60:
+        return "MODERATE RISK"
+    return "HIGH RISK"
+
+
+def run_review(target: str, as_json: bool) -> int:
+    questions = REVIEW_QUESTIONS[target]
+    passed: list[str] = []
+    failed: list[str] = []
+    score = 0
+    max_score = sum(q.weight for q in questions)
+
+    print(f"Security Review: {target.title()}\n")
+    for index, question in enumerate(questions, start=1):
+        ok = ask_boolean(f"{index}. {question.text}")
+        if ok:
+            score += question.weight
+            passed.append(question.text)
+        else:
+            failed.append(question.text)
+
+    result = {
+        "target": target,
+        "score": score,
+        "max_score": max_score,
+        "risk": grade(score, max_score),
+        "passed": passed,
+        "failed": failed,
+    }
+
+    if as_json:
+        print(json.dumps(result, indent=2))
+    else:
+        print("\n=== Review Summary ===")
+        print(f"Score: {score}/{max_score}")
+        print(f"Overall: {result['risk']}")
+        print("Passed controls:")
+        for item in passed:
+            print(f"  - {item}")
+        print("Failed controls:")
+        for item in failed:
+            print(f"  - {item}")
+    return 0
+
+
+def files_to_scan(path: Path) -> list[Path]:
+    if path.is_file():
+        return [path]
+    return [p for p in path.rglob("*") if p.is_file() and p.suffix in {".py", ".js", ".ts", ".json", ".yaml", ".yml"}]
+
+
+def sha256_text(content: str) -> str:
+    return hashlib.sha256(content.encode("utf-8", errors="ignore")).hexdigest()
+
+
+def run_patch_check(path: Path, as_json: bool) -> int:
+    if not path.exists():
+        print(f"ERROR: path not found: {path}")
+        return 2
+
+    findings: list[dict[str, str | int]] = []
+    scanned = 0
+
+    for file_path in files_to_scan(path):
+        scanned += 1
+        content = file_path.read_text(encoding="utf-8", errors="ignore")
+        for pattern, description in SUSPICIOUS_PATTERNS.items():
+            for match in re.finditer(pattern, content):
+                line_no = content.count("\n", 0, match.start()) + 1
+                findings.append(
+                    {
+                        "file": str(file_path),
+                        "line": line_no,
+                        "issue": description,
+                        "pattern": pattern,
+                    }
+                )
+
+        if "security_review_app.py" in str(file_path):
+            findings.append(
+                {
+                    "file": str(file_path),
+                    "line": 1,
+                    "issue": f"file fingerprint sha256={sha256_text(content)[:16]}... (use for original-code tracking)",
+                    "pattern": "fingerprint",
+                }
+            )
+
+    result = {"scanned_files": scanned, "findings": findings, "risk": "HIGH" if findings else "LOW"}
+
+    if as_json:
+        print(json.dumps(result, indent=2))
+    else:
+        print("=== Patch Check Report ===")
+        print(f"Scanned files: {scanned}")
+        print(f"Risk: {result['risk']}")
+        if findings:
+            for finding in findings:
+                print(f"- {finding['file']}:{finding['line']} -> {finding['issue']}")
+        else:
+            print("No suspicious patterns found.")
+    return 0
+
+
+def main() -> int:
+    args = parse_args()
+    if args.command == "review":
+        return run_review(args.target, args.json)
+    if args.command == "patch-check":
+        return run_patch_check(args.path, args.json)
+    return 2
+
+
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+    raise SystemExit(main())