diff --git a/AUDIT_OPEN.md b/AUDIT_OPEN.md
index 05002b4..f4e83fe 100644
--- a/AUDIT_OPEN.md
+++ b/AUDIT_OPEN.md
@@ -1,5 +1,23 @@
# Open audit items
+## 2026-10-04 — wave 5 (live: S02 batch, production upgrade, shadows on)
+
+- Production ship web+worker upgraded `dd5b13e` -> `80c9187` (coordinated
+ stop; pre-deploy backup `pre-80c9187-shadow-deploy-2026-10-04` verified;
+ the five waiting runs survived intact; gateway stayed at `c0b07dd`).
+- Shadow flags set on production: `SHIP_BUDGET_RESERVATION`,
+ `SHIP_MODEL_ROUTING`, `SHIP_PLACEMENT`, `SHIP_TOOL_MANIFEST`,
+ `SHIP_KNOWLEDGE_PROVENANCE` = shadow, `SHIP_POLICY_SHADOW=on`.
+ `SHIP_MODEL_ROUTING` shadow logs "no usable policy" until
+ `SHIP_MODEL_ROUTING_POLICY` is set — setting that policy is now the
+ unblock for that shadow's logs. Shadow-log review before any `on` flip
+ is still the rule (see NEXT_SESSION.md).
+- S02 executed (A only, $0 real spend): see
+ `evals/product-journeys/BATCH_2026-10-04.md`. Upstream reports filed
+ (neutron#6, teploy-cli#18/#19/#20 — links above/below).
+- The integration-check test-quoting defect (spaced checkout paths) was
+ fixed in PR #56.
+
## 2026-10-04 — wave 4 (S07, S13, S15/S17, S19, S21, S22, S24, S26, S27)
All off by default or observe-only; flags are in the programme's wave-4 table.
@@ -8,9 +26,12 @@ All off by default or observe-only; flags are in the programme's wave-4 table.
legacy path (unreadable status, including a brand-new destination, holds).
A manual `teploy deploy` landing inside Ship's deploy is overwritten and still
reads back confirmed; the lease serialises Ship's own releases on one host
- only. Upstream feature requests (not filed): deploy dry-run; deploy generation
- and compare-and-set in `status --json`; documented `logs` flags and a
- no-deployment-versus-unreachable signal.
+ only. Upstream feature requests (filed 2026-10-04): deploy dry-run
+ ([teploy-cli#18](http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/teploy-cli/issues/18)); deploy generation
+ and compare-and-set in `status --json`
+ ([teploy-cli#19](http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/teploy-cli/issues/19)); documented `logs` flags and a
+ no-deployment-versus-unreachable signal
+ ([teploy-cli#20](http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/teploy-cli/issues/20)).
- **S21 (PR #51):** provenance is a sidecar, not fields on the note. Project
scope is repo-only. Pre-flag notes read as unknown. Run `shadow` and read the
logs before `on`.
@@ -114,7 +135,7 @@ detail is in the programme's wave-2 status table. Items that matter for audit:
`teploy deploy` can race a tracked delivery; a destination lease is needed
before a Teploy adapter may declare fencing. Upstream feature requests (not
defects): a Teploy CLI dry-run, and a status field exposing a deploy
- generation. Not yet filed.
+ generation. Filed 2026-10-04: teploy-cli#18 and #19.
- **S13 (PR #28):** the steer-route refusal has no automated test.
- **S21, S22, S23, S24, S06:** modules exist unwired (PRs #22, #19, #21, #23,
#29); see each PR's wiring list. The tool-manifest schema is strict, so a
diff --git a/NEXT_SESSION.md b/NEXT_SESSION.md
index 741e0ec..e9468d6 100644
--- a/NEXT_SESSION.md
+++ b/NEXT_SESSION.md
@@ -1,35 +1,33 @@
# Next session
-The single forward plan is [docs/SHIP_RELEASE_PROGRAMME_2026-09-21.md](docs/SHIP_RELEASE_PROGRAMME_2026-09-21.md); its **Execution status** section (the wave-2, wave-3 and wave-4 tables) is the only status list. Open audit items and deferred findings live in [AUDIT_OPEN.md](AUDIT_OPEN.md). Update both rather than creating another plan.
+The single forward plan is [docs/SHIP_RELEASE_PROGRAMME_2026-09-21.md](docs/SHIP_RELEASE_PROGRAMME_2026-09-21.md); its **Execution status** section (the wave-2, wave-3 and wave-4 tables) plus the wave-5 notes at the top of [AUDIT_OPEN.md](AUDIT_OPEN.md) are the only status lists. Update both rather than creating another plan.
-## Where things stand (2026-10-04)
+## Where things stand (2026-10-04, after wave 5)
-Everything below is **implemented and checked by automated tests only**. No row has a verified outcome: no live Ship, Nucleus, sandbox, forge, preview target or model gateway was reachable, and nothing was spent. Most wave-2 modules are tested but not called by any route or worker; waves 3 and 4 wired many of them behind flags that are **off by default** (or observe-only), so default behaviour is unchanged.
+Wave 4's state ("implemented and checked by automated tests only") is now partly superseded by live receipts:
-## Needs a human decision first
+- **S02 batch executed** (A only, glm-5.3 via the gateway's coding-plan key, $0 real spend): canary + 33 runs, 24/33 first-attempt passes, $1.81 priced. Read [evals/product-journeys/BATCH_2026-10-04.md](evals/product-journeys/BATCH_2026-10-04.md) first — including the `pj-s-question` 0/3 variance signal.
+- **Production upgraded** `dd5b13e` -> `80c9187`: coordinated stop, pre-deploy backup verified, five waiting runs intact, gateway untouched at `c0b07dd`.
+- **Shadows are ON in production** (budget-reservation, model-routing, policy, tool-manifest, knowledge-provenance = shadow; policy-shadow = on). They need soak time and then a log review before any `on` flip.
+- **Founder decisions recorded 2026-10-04**: S28 n>=20 confirmed; S25 service-account stays id-only; S08 findings WILL reach PR body + webhook (approved, **not yet built** — new work); the 79 sub-24px targets stay compact; upstream reports filed (neutron#6 404 page, teploy-cli#18/#19/#20).
+- **Known live variance**: `pj-s-question` canary pass + 0/3 batch — compare the four transcripts before touching prompts.
-1. **Paid evaluation batch** (S02, propose-only): 66 runs, hard cap $25, details in the programme's S02 slice. It must run from somewhere that can reach a Ship instance. The graders were tightened in PR #34, so the retained results were scored under looser graders and were not re-graded.
-2. S28 percentile threshold (n>=20) was an agent's choice.
-3. S25 service-account role (shadow treats service accounts as id-only matches).
-4. Whether S08 test-integrity findings should reach the PR body and webhook (would change the worker path).
-5. The 79 sub-24px compact targets from the UI audit (keep or enlarge).
-6. File the upstream reports: Neutron plain-text 404 page (`docs/UI_AUDIT_2026-10-03.md`), and the Teploy CLI feature requests in `AUDIT_OPEN.md`. Nothing has been filed.
-7. When each wired flag should be turned on (shadow first, read the logs).
+## Next work, in order
-## Needs live systems or the owner's side
-
-S01 credential proofs on a real sandbox with a private repo; preview isolation (teploy-cli); end-to-end journeys; real-Nucleus checks; the S03 storage migration rehearsal on a restored copy; real deployment adapters; real placement targets; human observation of dashboard users; re-grading retained runs where their trees exist; shadow-log review before enabling any flag.
-
-## Safe next work (no live system needed)
-
-- Turn shadow findings into decisions once logs exist; otherwise wire the remaining pure modules (S15/S17 into delivery and incidents, S07 into the plan-park point without adding a durable step, S19 snapshot producer and restore-check command, S18 worker wiring).
-- The untouched or barely started packages: S04, S12, S10 follow-ups (offline and error states, other roles), remaining S07 parts.
-- Add `./plan-grounding`, `./deployment-adapter`, `./policy-inheritance`, `./tool-manifest` and `./teploy-adapter` subpath exports only when something imports them.
+1. **Shadow-log review** after soak (placement/policy/budget/tool-manifest/knowledge-provenance JSONL + reports); set `SHIP_MODEL_ROUTING_POLICY` so the routing shadow has something to record. Only then discuss any `on` flips.
+2. **S08 wiring** (approved): findings into PR body + webhook behind a default-off flag; worker-path change, so shadow-first per the standing rule.
+3. **Live proofs still open**: S01 credential proofs on a real sandbox with a private repo; S03 storage migration (write the additive migration, rehearse on a restored copy — backup `pre-80c9187-shadow-deploy-2026-10-04` is available and verified); S27 real teploy-adapter run against a scratch target; S19 doctor probes against the real store/clock; human observation of dashboard users.
+4. **Code still unfinished**: S04 and S12 barely started; most of S07 beyond the grounding check; S10 follow-ups (offline/error states, other roles, screen readers); wiring the inert modules (S15/S17 into delivery+incidents, S19 snapshot producer + restore-check, S18 worker tree provisioning, S07 into the plan-park point).
+5. **Re-grade retained runs where possible**: only transcripts were preserved for pre-batch runs, so regrades are limited to transcript+fixture-verifiable scenarios; write supplementary `regrade-*.json` beside the records, never replacing originals.
+6. **Deferred**: configuration B of the S02 comparison (needs real API spend, owner-gated).
## Working rules that paid off
- One branch and PR per slice; merge only on green CI, pinned to the checked head; resolve conflicts by merging main in, never rewriting history.
- Agents in parallel worktrees: give each its own scratch directory (the shared one caused a backup collision) and tell them to skip `scripts/grader-sensitivity.test.mjs` locally (fixed port 8901); CI runs it.
- Every wiring change: default-off equivalence test, a real-path test with the flag on, a negative control per rule.
+- Quote interpolated paths in any command template a test executes (PR #56 was the spaced-checkout lesson).
+- Never redeploy a teploy app from a hand-copied or stripped teploy.yml — deploy from the repo that owns the full one, or you fight the original deployment's shape (the 2026-10-04 gateway incident: ad-hoc deploy from a stripped yml removed the running container; restored by redeploying the exact revision from the real repo with no data loss, but it did not need to happen).
+- Production changes: coordinated stop + verified backup first (scripts/ship-backup.sh), waiting runs must survive, gateway is a separate app and stays up.
Before finishing any slice: `pnpm run lint`, `pnpm test`, and for `web/` changes `cd web && pnpm test && pnpm run build`. Install `web` dependencies first (`cd web && pnpm install --frozen-lockfile`) or the deployment-pin script test fails for an environmental reason.
diff --git a/docs/SHIP_RELEASE_PROGRAMME_2026-09-21.md b/docs/SHIP_RELEASE_PROGRAMME_2026-09-21.md
index 3ed61fa..837d271 100644
--- a/docs/SHIP_RELEASE_PROGRAMME_2026-09-21.md
+++ b/docs/SHIP_RELEASE_PROGRAMME_2026-09-21.md
@@ -512,14 +512,14 @@ This section supersedes the earlier table where rows overlap (S13, S28, S05, S06
| S21 | #22 | `src/knowledge-record.ts` provenance, verification, freshness, correction, redaction closure, visibility | 11 tests + 10 negative controls | Not wired; needs provenance fields and a project concept; decision acceptance, cross-project sharing, retrieval baseline not built |
| S24 | #23 | `src/tool-manifest.ts` validation, intersection-only permissions, conformance audit, signed and deduped event envelope | 25 tests + 8 negative controls | Not wired; enforcement stays with the credential and executor layer; manifest schema is strict (newer-minor manifests are rejected) |
| S16 | #24 | `src/schedule-time.ts` timezone and DST-aware daily/weekly slots, missed-run policy, overlap, debounce | 34 tests, naive-implementation control, 7 mutations | Overlap is inert in production (the worker does not pass `isRunning`); no UI or API to create `at` schedules; no event triggers |
-| S25 | #25 | `src/policy-inheritance.ts` org/project/user/service-account resolution, intersection only, fail-closed | 21 tests + union-merge control + 3 mutations | Not wired; no layer store, model/tool/retention enforcement or lifecycle; **service-account role needs product confirmation** |
+| S25 | #25 | `src/policy-inheritance.ts` org/project/user/service-account resolution, intersection only, fail-closed | 21 tests + union-merge control + 3 mutations | Not wired; no layer store, model/tool/retention enforcement or lifecycle; **service-account role: owner confirmed 2026-10-04 — keep id-only matches** |
| S26 | #26 | `src/execution-target.ts` placement with reasons, host-loss recovery, conformance | 23 tests, 10 mutations, two fake backends | Not wired into `SandboxPool` or `durable.ts`; no real Windows/macOS/mobile/GPU adapter |
| S27 | #27 | `src/deployment-adapter.ts` adapter contract, delivery and recovery and provisioning journeys, 27-check conformance suite | 48 tests, 2 faithful + 9 faulty fakes, 8 mutations | No real Teploy/CI/Kubernetes adapter, so S27 acceptance is not met; Teploy has no destination-level fence |
| S13 | #28 | Full capability declaration for native, claude-code and opencode; shared plan-review refusal; pure `conformanceCheck` | 8 new tests + negative control | Per-harness journeys on live runs; `conformanceCheck` not wired to adapter probes; steer-route refusal has no automated test |
| S06 | #29 | `src/environment-recipe.ts` recipe, planning, teardown, lifecycle validation | 18 tests, 6 mutation-verified controls, fake runner only | Not wired; no real runner or cache store; large/binary transport, browser tooling, snapshot secret scan open |
| S02 graders | #34 | `scripts/grader-sensitivity.mjs` plus 73 hand-written variants (60 wrong, 12 correct references, 1 known limit) across all 12 scenarios, committed matrix; **eight grader tightenings after 11 wrong variants passed against the previous graders** (deploy-recovery health gate satisfied by a comment and by a lying server, permissions accepted 403 where the manifest says 401, API catch-all 409, migration edited in place, "30-minute" wording, scheduled-job store bypass, applied diff in a plan) | 79 tests; 60/60 wrong variants rejected for their targeted reason, 12/12 references accepted; negative controls (stub grader passes everything, sabotaged reference, reverted fix) | Variants are finite; the review grader stays lexical; the tightened graders have not run on a live baseline; **retained results were not re-graded, so earlier pass counts were scored under the looser graders**; `pj-s-feature` accepts a marked-placeholder contact page by design (known limit); deploy-recovery grading uses fixed port 8901 and cannot run in parallel |
-| S10 | #33 | `scripts/ui-audit.mjs` (47 routes x 5 viewports, optional axe-core, JSON and markdown report) and five defect-class fixes (input labels, empty table headers, underlined in-text links, keyboard-reachable scrolling regions, narrow-viewport overflow); report in `docs/UI_AUDIT_2026-10-03.md` | 14 helper tests with negative controls, 3 web source guards, one full audit run (230 page loads; no error-level finding or axe violation on audited pages apart from the framework 404) | No human observation of target users; 79 targets under 24px kept as compact controls (design decision); framework plain-text 404 (upstream-report candidate, not filed); keyboard activation, offline and error states, other roles, screen readers, `/connect*`, `/oidc/*`, `/hooks/*`, `/api/*` not audited |
-| S28 | #30 | `timing` in `audit --format json` (not CSV), `timingSummary` with an n>=20 gate | 8 tests, CSV byte-pinned, mutation control; CLI wiring type-checked only | No real-store run; **the n>=20 threshold was an agent's choice and needs confirmation**; capacity table not recomputed |
+| S10 | #33 | `scripts/ui-audit.mjs` (47 routes x 5 viewports, optional axe-core, JSON and markdown report) and five defect-class fixes (input labels, empty table headers, underlined in-text links, keyboard-reachable scrolling regions, narrow-viewport overflow); report in `docs/UI_AUDIT_2026-10-03.md` | 14 helper tests with negative controls, 3 web source guards, one full audit run (230 page loads; no error-level finding or axe violation on audited pages apart from the framework 404) | No human observation of target users; 79 targets under 24px kept as compact controls (**owner-confirmed 2026-10-04**); framework plain-text 404 (filed upstream as [Tyler/neutron#6](http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/neutron/issues/6)); keyboard activation, offline and error states, other roles, screen readers, `/connect*`, `/oidc/*`, `/hooks/*`, `/api/*` not audited |
+| S28 | #30 | `timing` in `audit --format json` (not CSV), `timingSummary` with an n>=20 gate | 8 tests, CSV byte-pinned, mutation control; CLI wiring type-checked only | No real-store run; **the n>=20 threshold was confirmed by the owner 2026-10-04**; capacity table not recomputed |
#### Wave 3 (2026-10-04): wiring behind flags
@@ -583,7 +583,18 @@ Small specifications per the slice discipline above, recorded against their exis
Spec, evidence and the open prerequisites are in `AUDIT_OPEN.md` (2026-10-02/03 entry). Rollout order: confirm the Sandbox daemon forwards per-exec `env` and the image's git is 2.31+; prove a private-repo clone and push on Forgejo and GitHub through the real sandbox with `SHIP_GIT_CREDENTIAL=env` on a canary worker; observe; only then change the default. Revert is unsetting the variable.
-#### S02 — proposed current-versus-candidate batch (**awaiting your approval; nothing run, nothing spent**)
+#### S02 — batch EXECUTED 2026-10-04, configuration A only (owner decision)
+
+The owner approved **A only**: the gateway's `ZAI_API_KEY` was rotated to a
+z.ai coding-plan (subscription) credential, so configuration A
+(`zai/glm-5.3`) ran with **$0 real spend**; configuration B
+(`anthropic/claude-sonnet-5`) was not run and no API dollars were spent.
+Canary `eval-20261003-2` (pass) then the 11-scenario × 3 batch
+(`eval-20261003-3/-4`, `eval-20261004-1/-2/-3/-4`): **24/33 first-attempt
+passes, $1.81 priced total** (accounting rate table, not dollars).
+Summary and honest reads: [../evals/product-journeys/BATCH_2026-10-04.md](../evals/product-journeys/BATCH_2026-10-04.md).
+Not done: the B leg of the comparison (needs real API spend, owner-gated);
+re-grading retained pre-tightened-grader results.
- **Purpose:** a regression comparison on the existing 12-scenario product-journey set. It is **not** a held-out result: these scenarios have been seen, graders amended, and the review grader tuned, so they are a development/regression set. Do not quote it as general quality or market rank.
- **Configurations (exact):** A, current default: native harness, `zai/glm-5.3`, existing project settings. B, candidate: native harness, `anthropic/claude-sonnet-5`, same project settings and prompts. Everything else identical; harness revision and fixture hashes are recorded by the runner. The prompts were tuned against GLM only (docs/MODELS.md), so B is disadvantaged by construction; a loss for B is not evidence about the model.
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/BATCH_2026-10-04.md b/evals/product-journeys/BATCH_2026-10-04.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b20467d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/BATCH_2026-10-04.md
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# S02 batch — 2026-10-04, configuration A only (glm-5.3 via the z.ai coding-plan key)
+
+First executed batch of the proposed current-versus-candidate comparison
+(SHIP_RELEASE_PROGRAMME §S02). The owner approved **A only** on 2026-10-04:
+configuration A (native harness, `zai/glm-5.3`, existing project settings)
+run through the production Ship instance's gateway, whose `ZAI_API_KEY` was
+rotated to a subscription (coding-plan) credential first — so the priced
+figures below are accounting estimates at the deployment's rate table
+($1.00 in / $3.20 out per 1M tokens), not dollar spend. Configuration B
+(`anthropic/claude-sonnet-5`) was **not** run; no API dollars were spent.
+The $25 hard cap was therefore never approached.
+
+- **Canary** (required first): `eval-20261003-2` `pj-s-question` n=1 —
+ pass, 45 s, $0.0121 priced.
+- **Batch**: `eval-20261003-3`, `eval-20261003-4`, `eval-20261004-1`
+ (11 scenarios × 3 repeats, `pj-b-db-migration` excluded as planned) plus
+ `eval-20261004-2/-3/-4` (`pj-c-same-pr` × 3 — its `same-pr` fixture-repo
+ mapping was missing from the first invocation, which honestly recorded
+ three NOT-RUN refusals inside `eval-20261003-3`; the repeats are complete
+ in their own run ids).
+- **Production stack**: ship web+worker `dd5b13e`, gateway `c0b07dd`,
+ harness `7c3388c` (records pin it). Deployed application revision at run
+ time was `dd5b13e`; the `80c9187` upgrade happened after the batch.
+
+## Result (first-attempt, independent graders, no rescue)
+
+**24 of 33 batch runs passed (72.7%).**
+
+| scenario | per-repeat | batch |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| pj-s-plan | pass pass pass | 3/3 |
+| pj-s-copy | pass pass pass | 3/3 |
+| pj-b-perms-defect | pass pass pass | 3/3 |
+| pj-b-deploy-recovery | pass pass pass | 3/3 |
+| pj-c-dependency-update | pass pass pass | 3/3 |
+| pj-c-scheduled-job | pass pass pass | 3/3 |
+| pj-b-api-defect | fail pass pass | 2/3 |
+| pj-c-same-pr | pass fail pass | 2/3 |
+| pj-s-feature | fail fail pass | 1/3 |
+| pj-c-review | fail pass fail | 1/3 |
+| pj-s-question | fail fail fail | 0/3 |
+
+- **Cost**: $1.5050 (30 logged runs) + $0.2913 (same-pr × 3) + $0.0121
+ (canary) = **$1.81 priced total**; $0 real (subscription key).
+- **Interventions/rescue**: none (`rescueNeeded=false` everywhere).
+- **Exclusions**: none — no `harness-error`, no `authority-hold` in the
+ batch (the excluded migration scenario is the one that would hold).
+
+## Honest reads
+
+- This is a **development/regression set**, not a held-out result: the
+ scenarios have been seen, graders amended (PR #34), and the prompts were
+ tuned against GLM. Do not quote it as general quality.
+- `pj-s-question` passed the canary and failed all three batch repeats —
+ the single largest variance signal in the set. The canary record
+ (`eval-20261003-2`) and the three failures are all preserved; comparing
+ their transcripts is the first stop before any prompt change.
+- Retained earlier results were scored under looser graders and were NOT
+ re-graded; this batch is the first clean current baseline under the
+ tightened set, which is what it was for.
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/README.md b/evals/product-journeys/results/README.md
index e9bc816..ef5febe 100644
--- a/evals/product-journeys/results/README.md
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/README.md
@@ -41,10 +41,15 @@ pass, so keep it out of model-quality denominators and count it on its own.
Records written before this class existed keep their original outcome; a
supplementary `reclassification-*.json` beside them says what they would be.
-## Status: NO BASELINE NUMBERS EXIST YET
-
-Execution wiring exists and is gated (`--i-authorize-spend`); it has been
-validated against the mock adapter only. No scenario has run against a real
-model through this harness — the first live run is the orchestrator's
-single-scenario canary (`pj-s-question` via the ship adapter). Records
-written so far by tests use temp results roots and are not baselines.
+## Status
+
+- **First live canary**: `eval-20261003-2` `pj-s-question` n=1 via the ship
+ adapter (pass). Mock-adapter validation predates it.
+- **First executed batch (2026-10-04, configuration A only)**:
+ `eval-20261003-3`, `eval-20261003-4`, `eval-20261004-1` (11 scenarios
+ × 3 repeats; `pj-b-db-migration` excluded as planned) plus
+ `eval-20261004-2/-3/-4` (`pj-c-same-pr` × 3). Summary and honest reads:
+ [../BATCH_2026-10-04.md](../BATCH_2026-10-04.md). 24/33 first-attempt
+ passes, $1.81 priced, $0 real spend (coding-plan key). Records earlier
+ than this batch were scored under the pre-PR-#34 graders and keep their
+ original grades.
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-2/pj-s-question/artifacts/grader-output.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-2/pj-s-question/artifacts/grader-output.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..85591cb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-2/pj-s-question/artifacts/grader-output.json
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-s-question",
+ "grader": "graders/pj-s-question.mjs",
+ "pass": true,
+ "reasons": [],
+ "evidence": [
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "work tree unchanged",
+ "value": {
+ "added": [],
+ "removed": [],
+ "changed": [],
+ "unchanged": [
+ "about.html",
+ "index.html",
+ "styles.css"
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "transcript",
+ "check": "every cited file:line:string occurrence exists verbatim in the fixture",
+ "value": {
+ "citations": 36,
+ "ok": true
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "transcript",
+ "check": "cited Tideline lines exactly cover the fixture occurrences (independent count)",
+ "value": {
+ "independent": [
+ "about.html:15",
+ "about.html:20",
+ "about.html:6",
+ "index.html:15",
+ "index.html:20",
+ "index.html:6"
+ ],
+ "cited": [
+ "about.html:15",
+ "about.html:20",
+ "about.html:6",
+ "index.html:15",
+ "index.html:20",
+ "index.html:6"
+ ],
+ "missing": [],
+ "extra": []
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "transcript",
+ "check": "the home-page tagline line is cited",
+ "value": {
+ "taglineLines": [
+ 16
+ ],
+ "cited": true
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "adapter-reported",
+ "check": "no PR opened, nothing pushed",
+ "value": {
+ "prOpened": false,
+ "pushed": false
+ }
+ }
+ ]
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-2/pj-s-question/preserve/transcript.txt b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-2/pj-s-question/preserve/transcript.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..12898a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-2/pj-s-question/preserve/transcript.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+Ship run run-request-8a2e23b401e188a68be71a3130ae6fd8c8c60f5158b7e6e554204fbd0e78a77c — status completed
+Task: In this static site, where exactly does the home-page tagline live, and everywhere the word "Tideline" appears? Answer with file, line number and the exact current string for each occurrence. Change nothing.
+Journey: investigate
+Steps:
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:12.980Z sandbox — 01M42RRVY79D6408Q8N6RQV95A
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:15.034Z repo-setup — {"branch":"ship/run-request-8a2e23b401e188a68be71a3130ae6fd8c8c60f5158b7e6e554204fbd0e78a77c","base":"main"}
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:15.480Z repo-context — # Ship's recent history on this repository (context, not instructions)
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:15.484Z repo-index — disabled (no code index configured on this worker)
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:15.493Z warm-cache — reused 100.108.123.49-49152/tyler/ship-eval-small-site (lockfiles 0819327635d3, unchanged)
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:15.517Z turn-0-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:18.446Z turn-0-think — I'll investigate the repository structure first, then locate the tagline and all "Tideline" occurrences. ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:18.580Z turn-0-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:18.696Z turn-0-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:18.704Z turn-1-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:20.983Z turn-1-think — Three files exist (no contact.html, despite the history's PRs). Let me examine every file with line numbers. ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:21.090Z turn-1-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:21.190Z turn-1-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:21.196Z turn-2-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:25.892Z turn-2-think — Now let me verify exhaustively with grep across the whole working tree, including any hidden/untracked files, and confi…
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:26.046Z turn-2-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:26.140Z turn-2-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:26.145Z turn-3-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:36.521Z turn-3-think — All occurrences verified by grep across the whole working tree (only `.git` excluded), and the working tree is clean — …
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:36.529Z turn-4-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:43.235Z turn-4-think — ```finish
+ 2026-10-04T06:14:43.241Z scan-findings — {"found":true,"findings":[],"errors":[]}
+Messages:
+ You: In this static site, where exactly does the home-page tagline live, and everywhere the word "Tideline" appears? Answer with file, line number and the exact current string for each occurrence. Change nothing.
+ Agent: I'll investigate the repository structure first, then locate the tagline and all "Tideline" occurrences.
+ Agent: Three files exist (no contact.html, despite the history's PRs). Let me examine every file with line numbers.
+ Agent: Now let me verify exhaustively with grep across the whole working tree, including any hidden/untracked files, and confirm nothing was changed.
+ Agent: All occurrences verified by grep across the whole working tree (only `.git` excluded), and the working tree is clean — nothing was edited.
+
+**Direct answer:** The home-page tagline lives at `index.html:16` — `
Furniture made on the coast
` (the visible text is "Furniture made on the coast"; it is styled italic by the `.tagline` rule at `styles.css:18`–20). The word "Tideline" appears in exactly 6 places, always capitalized exactly as "Tideline" and always as part of "Tideline Woodworks": 3 in `index.html` and 3 in `about.html`.
+
+**Supporting detail**
+
+Tagline:
+- `index.html:16` — `
Furniture made on the coast
` (the only tagline markup in the site)
+- Related style hook (not the tagline itself): `styles.css:18` — `.tagline {` containing `font-style: italic;`
+
+"Tideline" occurrences (exact current strings, leading whitespace included):
+- `index.html:6` — ` Tideline Woodworks`
+- `index.html:15` — `
`
+
+Evidence and confidence:
+- Method: `grep -rni tideline` and `grep -rn Tideline` over the entire working directory excluding `.git` returned identical 6-line results; a case-variant check (`-i` minus exact `Tideline`) returned nothing, so there are no "tideline"/"TIDELINE" variants and none in `styles.css`. The repo contains only `index.html`, `about.html`, and `styles.css`.
+- These findings come from directly reading/grepping the files — the repo has no tests, so nothing here was test-verified.
+- Minor uncertainty: the repo is on branch `ship/run-request-...` and does **not** contain the `contact.html` or "Our story" nav changes described in the recent-history notes, so those PRs are not reflected in this working tree. Line numbers above are for the current checkout only.
+- `git status --porcelain` is empty: no files were modified, and nothing was published.
+
+FINDINGS_JSON []
+ Agent: ```finish
+**Direct answer:** The home-page tagline lives at `index.html:16` — `
Furniture made on the coast
` (visible text "Furniture made on the coast", styled italic by the `.tagline` rule at `styles.css:18`–20). The word "Tideline" appears in exactly 6 places, always capitalized as "Tideline" and always as part of "Tideline Woodworks": 3 in `index.html`, 3 in `about.html`.
+
+**Supporting detail**
+
+Tagline:
+- `index.html:16` — `
Furniture made on the coast
` (the only tagline markup in the site)
+- Related style hook only (not the tagline itself): `styles.css:18` — `.tagline {` containing `font-style: italic;`
+
+"Tideline" occurrences (exact current strings, leading whitespace included):
+- `index.html:6` — ` Tideline Woodworks`
+- `index.html:15` — `
`
+
+Evidence and confidence:
+- Verified by running `grep -rni tideline` and `grep -rn Tideline` over the entire working directory (excluding `.git`); both returned the identical 6 lines above, and a case-variant check returned nothing — so there are no "tideline"/"TIDELINE" variants and no occurrences in `styles.css`. The repo contains only `index.html`, `about.html`, and `styles.css`.
+- These findings come from direct inspection (grep/reading files); the repo has no tests, so nothing here was test-verified.
+- Uncertainty: this checkout (branch `ship/run-request-8a2e23b401e188a68be71a3130ae6fd8c8c60f5158b7e6e554204fbd0e78a77c`) does not contain the `contact.html` page or the "Our story" nav renaming mentioned in the recent-history notes, so those PRs are not reflected here; line numbers apply to this checkout only.
+- Nothing was changed: `git status --porcelain` was empty before and after inspection, and no changes were published.
+
+FINDINGS_JSON []
+```
+ Agent: **Direct answer:** The home-page tagline lives at `index.html:16` — `
Furniture made on the coast
` (visible text "Furniture made on the coast", styled italic by the `.tagline` rule at `styles.css:18`–20). The word "Tideline" appears in exactly 6 places, always capitalized as "Tideline" and always as part of "Tideline Woodworks": 3 in `index.html`, 3 in `about.html`.
+
+**Supporting detail**
+
+Tagline:
+- `index.html:16` — `
Furniture made on the coast
` (the only tagline markup in the site)
+- Related style hook only (not the tagline itself): `styles.css:18` — `.tagline {` containing `font-style: italic;`
+
+"Tideline" occurrences (exact current strings, leading whitespace included):
+- `index.html:6` — ` Tideline Woodworks`
+- `index.html:15` — `
`
+
+Evidence and confidence:
+- Verified by running `grep -rni tideline` and `grep -rn Tideline` over the entire working directory (excluding `.git`); both returned the identical 6 lines above, and a case-variant check returned nothing — so there are no "tideline"/"TIDELINE" variants and no occurrences in `styles.css`. The repo contains only `index.html`, `about.html`, and `styles.css`.
+- These findings come from direct inspection (grep/reading files); the repo has no tests, so nothing here was test-verified.
+- Uncertainty: this checkout (branch `ship/run-request-8a2e23b401e188a68be71a3130ae6fd8c8c60f5158b7e6e554204fbd0e78a77c`) does not contain the `contact.html` page or the "Our story" nav renaming mentioned in the recent-history notes, so those PRs are not reflected here; line numbers apply to this checkout only.
+- Nothing was changed: `git status --porcelain` was empty before and after inspection, and no changes were published.
+
+FINDINGS_JSON []
+Outcome: {"repo":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-small-site","summary":"**Direct answer:** The home-page tagline lives at `index.html:16` — `
Furniture made on the coast
` (visible text \"Furniture made on the coast\", styled italic by the `.tagline` rule at `styles.css:18`–20). The word \"Tideline\" appears in exactly 6 places, always capitalized as \"Tideline\" and always as part of \"Tideline Woodworks\": 3 in `index.html`, 3 in `about.html`.\n\n**Supporting detail**\n\nTagline:\n- `index.html:16` — `
Furniture made on the coast
` (the only tagline markup in the site)\n- Related style hook only (not the tagline itself): `styles.css:18` — `.tagline {` containing `font-style: italic;`\n\n\"Tideline\" occurrences (exact current strings, leading whitespace included):\n- `index.html:6` — ` Tideline Woodworks`\n- `index.html:15` — `
`\n\nEvidence and confidence:\n- Verified by running `grep -rni tideline` and `grep -rn Tideline` over the entire working directory (excluding `.git`); both returned the identical 6 lines above, and a case-variant check returned nothing — so there are no \"tideline\"/\"TIDELINE\" variants and no occurrences in `styles.css`. The repo contains only `index.html`, `about.html`, and `styles.css`.\n- These findings come from direct inspection (grep/reading files); the repo has no tests, so nothing here was test-verified.\n- Uncertainty: this checkout (branch `ship/run-request-8a2e23b401e188a68be71a3130ae6fd8c8c60f5158b7e6e554204fbd0e78a77c`) does not contain the `contact.html` page or the \"Our story\" nav renaming mentioned in the recent-history notes, so those PRs are not reflected here; line numbers apply to this checkout only.\n- Nothing was changed: `git status --porcelain` was empty before and after inspection, and no changes were published.\n\nFINDINGS_JSON []","usage":{"inputTokens":4206,"outputTokens":1807,"totalTokens":16509,"cacheReadTokens":10496}}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-2/pj-s-question/result.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-2/pj-s-question/result.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..539a3fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-2/pj-s-question/result.json
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-s-question",
+ "family": "small-site",
+ "runId": "eval-20261003-2",
+ "harnessRevision": "7c3388c2f1caf2841539a7e2b570b99fb2f58a36",
+ "fixtureRevision": "sha256:54aa415a72c85b5e2cb91895bcd9c07bb9263893b626ff391b37abbe6c3e7e98",
+ "adapter": "ship",
+ "outcome": "pass",
+ "firstAttempt": {
+ "pass": true,
+ "graderReasons": [],
+ "endedBy": "agent"
+ },
+ "eventualSuccess": {
+ "pass": true
+ },
+ "interventions": [],
+ "rescue": {
+ "needed": false,
+ "provided": false,
+ "notes": []
+ },
+ "latencyMs": 44937,
+ "cost": {
+ "status": "priced",
+ "amount": 0.012088,
+ "currency": "USD",
+ "source": "Ship run ledger (workspace API costUSD), summed over this attempt's runs"
+ },
+ "verifiedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "check": "work tree unchanged",
+ "value": {
+ "added": [],
+ "removed": [],
+ "changed": [],
+ "unchanged": [
+ "about.html",
+ "index.html",
+ "styles.css"
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "every cited file:line:string occurrence exists verbatim in the fixture",
+ "value": {
+ "citations": 36,
+ "ok": true
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "cited Tideline lines exactly cover the fixture occurrences (independent count)",
+ "value": {
+ "independent": [
+ "about.html:15",
+ "about.html:20",
+ "about.html:6",
+ "index.html:15",
+ "index.html:20",
+ "index.html:6"
+ ],
+ "cited": [
+ "about.html:15",
+ "about.html:20",
+ "about.html:6",
+ "index.html:15",
+ "index.html:20",
+ "index.html:6"
+ ],
+ "missing": [],
+ "extra": []
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "the home-page tagline line is cited",
+ "value": {
+ "taglineLines": [
+ 16
+ ],
+ "cited": true
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "no PR opened, nothing pushed",
+ "value": {
+ "prOpened": false,
+ "pushed": false
+ }
+ }
+ ],
+ "claimedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "claim": "**Direct answer:** The home-page tagline lives at `index.html:16` — `
Furniture made on the coast
` (visible text \"Furniture made on the coast\", styled italic by the `.tagline` rule at `styles.css:18`–20). The word \"Tideline\" appears in exactly 6 places, always capitalized as \"Tideline\" and always as part of \"Tideline Woodworks\": 3 in `index.html`, 3 in `about.html`.\n\n**Supporting detail**\n\nTagline:\n- `index.html:16` — `
Furniture made on the coast
` (the only tagline markup in the site)\n- Related style hook only (not the tagline itself): `styles.css:18` — `.tagline {` containing `font-style: italic;`\n\n\"Tideline\" occurrences (exact current strings, leading whitespace included):\n- `index.html:6` — ` Tideline Woodworks`\n- `index.html:15` — `
`\n\nEvidence and confidence:\n- Verified by running `grep -rni tideline` and `grep -rn Tideline` over the entire working directory (excluding `.git`); both returned the identical 6 lines above, and a case-variant check returned nothing — so there are no \"tideline\"/\"TIDELINE\" variants and no occurrences in `styles.css`. The repo contains only `index.html`, `about.html`, and `styles.css`.\n- These findings come from direct inspection (grep/reading files); the repo has no tests, so nothing here was test-verified.\n- Uncertainty: this checkout (branch `ship/run-request-8a2e23b401e188a68be71a3130ae6fd8c8c60f5158b7e6e554204fbd0e78a77c`) does not contain the `contact.html` page or the \"Our story\" nav renaming mentioned in the recent-history notes, so those PRs are not reflected here; line numbers apply to this checkout only.\n- Nothing was changed: `git status --porcelain` was empty before and after inspection, and no changes were published.\n\nFINDINGS_JSON []",
+ "verdict": "unverified"
+ }
+ ],
+ "artifacts": [
+ "preserve/transcript.txt",
+ "artifacts/grader-output.json"
+ ],
+ "preserve": {
+ "dir": "preserve/"
+ },
+ "probesApplied": [],
+ "gradedAt": "2026-10-04T06:14:50.203Z",
+ "startedAt": "2026-10-04T06:14:05.025Z",
+ "ship": {
+ "shipRuns": [
+ {
+ "role": "scenario",
+ "runId": "run-request-8a2e23b401e188a68be71a3130ae6fd8c8c60f5158b7e6e554204fbd0e78a77c",
+ "journey": "investigate",
+ "status": "completed",
+ "latencyMs": 42511,
+ "costUSD": 0.012087600000000002,
+ "costPriced": true,
+ "pr": null
+ }
+ ],
+ "fixtureRepo": {
+ "url": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/tyler/ship-eval-small-site.git",
+ "head": "eab3c41e06482456b2d6e8d6f61ef90502106457",
+ "ref": "refs/heads/main",
+ "treeMatchesFixture": true,
+ "mainAfter": "eab3c41e06482456b2d6e8d6f61ef90502106457",
+ "mainMoved": false
+ },
+ "captured": {
+ "sha": null,
+ "source": "none"
+ },
+ "disposition": [],
+ "pollRetries": 0,
+ "journey": "investigate",
+ "intake": "request"
+ }
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-2/summary.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-2/summary.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..349d4f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-2/summary.json
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+{
+ "runId": "eval-20261003-2",
+ "adapter": "ship",
+ "startedAt": "2026-10-04T06:14:05.025Z",
+ "completedAt": "2026-10-04T06:14:50.203Z",
+ "scenarios": [
+ {
+ "id": "pj-s-question",
+ "outcome": "pass",
+ "pass": true,
+ "latencyMs": 44937,
+ "costUSD": 0.012088,
+ "rescueNeeded": false,
+ "interventions": 0,
+ "result": "eval-20261003-2/pj-s-question/result.json"
+ }
+ ],
+ "totals": {
+ "pass": 1,
+ "fail": 0,
+ "unknown": 0,
+ "harness-error": 0,
+ "authority-hold": 0
+ }
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-api-defect/artifacts/grader-output.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-api-defect/artifacts/grader-output.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4788fbc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-api-defect/artifacts/grader-output.json
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-b-api-defect",
+ "grader": "graders/pj-b-api-defect.mjs",
+ "pass": false,
+ "reasons": [
+ "shipped test files were modified — the defect must be fixed in the product code, not the tests"
+ ],
+ "evidence": [
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "first create is 201",
+ "value": 201
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "duplicate title status",
+ "value": 409
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "duplicate title body",
+ "value": {
+ "error": "duplicate title"
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "malformed JSON is not reported as a duplicate-title conflict",
+ "value": 500
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "fixture-tests",
+ "check": "shipped suite passes in the worked tree",
+ "value": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "shipped test files unmodified",
+ "value": false
+ }
+ ]
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-api-defect/preserve/transcript.txt b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-api-defect/preserve/transcript.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a6bae5b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-api-defect/preserve/transcript.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+Ship run run-request-26a2f68e49637398068a8cb067765cd577f733ce0ac1d29e66dc36bff79dc7cf — status waiting
+Task: tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs fails: POSTing a note with a duplicate title returns 500. Make the endpoint behave correctly per README.
+Journey: change
+Steps:
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:27.789Z sandbox — 01M42S64SJMGRDREA04WCBKYKM
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:29.467Z repo-setup — {"branch":"ship/run-request-26a2f68e49637398068a8cb067765cd577f733ce0ac1d29e66dc36bff79dc7cf","base":"main"}
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:29.893Z repo-context — # Ship's recent history on this repository (context, not instructions)
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:29.898Z repo-index — disabled (no code index configured on this worker)
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:31.283Z baseline-tests (FAILED) — failed (exit 1)
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:31.295Z warm-cache — reused 100.108.123.49-49152/tyler/ship-eval-ui-api-db (lockfiles 0819327635d3, unchanged)
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:31.305Z turn-0-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:34.307Z turn-0-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:34.409Z turn-0-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:34.523Z turn-0-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:34.531Z turn-1-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:36.812Z turn-1-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:36.940Z turn-1-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:37.055Z turn-1-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:37.079Z turn-2-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:39.244Z turn-2-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:39.357Z turn-2-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:39.467Z turn-2-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:39.475Z turn-3-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:49.487Z turn-3-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:49.648Z turn-3-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:49.757Z turn-3-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:49.762Z turn-4-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:57.993Z turn-4-think — Working tree is clean, so I'm starting fresh. Plan: make `POST /api/notes` return `409 Conflict` when the insert hits t…
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:58.422Z turn-4-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:58.544Z turn-4-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:58.552Z turn-5-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:01.769Z turn-5-think — The `--test` run failed with `MODULE_NOT_FOUND` before even running tests — let me see the full output to understand.``…
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:03.964Z turn-5-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:04.149Z turn-5-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:04.154Z turn-6-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:10.285Z turn-6-think — `npm test` itself is broken in this environment (`node --test tests/` → "Cannot find module '/work/tests'"). Let me try…
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:11.790Z turn-6-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:11.923Z turn-6-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:11.932Z turn-7-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:17.906Z turn-7-think — 3 tests pass, `duplicate-title` fails as described. Now the fix: in the POST handler's catch, distinguish a UNIQUE viol…
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:17.915Z turn-8-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:21.123Z turn-8-think — ```edit
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:21.286Z turn-8-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:21.419Z turn-8-fingerprint — {"hash":"3abb2a8d07fb2e28","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:21.424Z turn-9-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:27.099Z turn-9-think — Edit applied. Now verify: full test run, plus a direct check of the 409 body and that unrelated POST errors (e.g. malfo…
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:29.015Z turn-9-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:29.129Z turn-9-fingerprint — {"hash":"3abb2a8d07fb2e28","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:29.143Z turn-10-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:42.342Z turn-10-think — All 4 tests pass and the duplicate returns 409. My ad-hoc "malformed JSON" probe was actually a valid JSON string (my h…
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:42.806Z turn-10-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:42.919Z turn-10-fingerprint — {"hash":"3abb2a8d07fb2e28","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:42.934Z turn-11-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:52.376Z turn-11-think — Behavior confirmed: true malformed JSON still 500s (pre-existing, untouched), and only `server.mjs` is modified. Two no…
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:52.769Z turn-11-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:52.888Z turn-11-fingerprint — {"hash":"06bf93b0b0872a98","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:52.898Z turn-12-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:55.015Z turn-12-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:56.488Z turn-12-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:56.617Z turn-12-fingerprint — {"hash":"06bf93b0b0872a98","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:22:56.648Z turn-13-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:01.598Z turn-13-think — All 4 tests pass. The changes are staged (the harness stages edits), so `git diff` was empty — let me view the full dif…
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:01.717Z turn-13-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:01.823Z turn-13-fingerprint — {"hash":"06bf93b0b0872a98","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:01.834Z turn-14-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:13.721Z turn-14-think — ```finish
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:13.732Z turn-15-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:20.318Z turn-15-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:21.983Z turn-15-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:22.106Z turn-15-fingerprint — {"hash":"06bf93b0b0872a98","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:22.121Z turn-16-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:28.832Z turn-16-think — ```finish
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:28.999Z turn-16-finish-tree — false
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:30.457Z turn-16-finish-tests — passed
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:30.464Z tests — passed
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:30.784Z change-class — {"class":"trivial","reasons":["3 files, 17 changed lines, suite green"],"files":[{"path":"README.md","added":2,"deleted…
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:32.968Z repo-push — pushed
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:33.309Z repo-pr — PR #13
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:33.314Z telemetry-check — disabled
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:33.496Z verification — body
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:33.501Z merge-park — {"attempt":1,"class":"trivial","reasons":["3 files, 17 changed lines, suite green"],"pr":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/T…
+ 2026-10-04T06:23:45.198Z merge-snapshot — teploy-sbx-snap:01m42sa04a2vf6steekpebmmay
+Messages:
+ You: tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs fails: POSTing a note with a duplicate title returns 500. Make the endpoint behave correctly per README.
+ Agent: Working tree is clean, so I'm starting fresh. Plan: make `POST /api/notes` return `409 Conflict` when the insert hits the `notes.title` UNIQUE constraint (README documents duplicates as a conflict), keeping the change scoped to that handler. First reproduce the failure and see the exact error shape `node:sqlite` throws.
+ Agent: The `--test` run failed with `MODULE_NOT_FOUND` before even running tests — let me see the full output to understand.
+ Agent: `npm test` itself is broken in this environment (`node --test tests/` → "Cannot find module '/work/tests'"). Let me try explicit file globs.
+ Agent: 3 tests pass, `duplicate-title` fails as described. Now the fix: in the POST handler's catch, distinguish a UNIQUE violation on `notes.title` (`err.code === 'ERR_SQLITE_ERROR'` + message) and return `409 {"error":"duplicate title"}`, leaving other errors as 500.
+ Agent: Edit applied. Now verify: full test run, plus a direct check of the 409 body and that unrelated POST errors (e.g. malformed JSON) still behave as before.
+ Agent: All 4 tests pass and the duplicate returns 409. My ad-hoc "malformed JSON" probe was actually a valid JSON string (my helper double-stringified), so let me verify true malformed input behaves as before, and clean up the stray `notes.sqlite` my first `createApp()` created in `/work`.
+ Agent: Behavior confirmed: true malformed JSON still 500s (pre-existing, untouched), and only `server.mjs` is modified. Two now-stale comments say the test is a *known failing* one — the defect is fixed, so I'll make them truthful, then re-run everything.
+ Agent: All 4 tests pass. The changes are staged (the harness stages edits), so `git diff` was empty — let me view the full diff against HEAD to confirm the final change set.
+ Agent: ```finish
+Fixed the duplicate-title 500 in POST /api/notes, verified by the repo's own tests.
+
+**Change (working tree, uncommitted):**
+- `server.mjs` — the POST handler's catch block now recognizes a SQLite UNIQUE-constraint failure on `notes.title` (via `err.code === 'ERR_SQLITE_ERROR'` plus the constraint message, which I confirmed is the exact shape `node:sqlite` v22 throws) and returns `409 {"error":"duplicate title"}`, matching the README's "Duplicate titles are a conflict." Any other error still returns the original 500, so unrelated failures are unaffected.
+- `README.md` / `tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs` — updated the now-false "known failing test / open defect" comments so the docs describe reality.
+
+**Verification:**
+- All 4 test files pass, including the previously failing `duplicate-title.test.mjs` (4 pass / 0 fail).
+- Live request checks: first POST → 201, duplicate POST → 409 `{"error":"duplicate title"}`, missing title/body → 400, genuinely malformed JSON → 500 (pre-existing behavior, deliberately untouched).
+- `git diff HEAD` shows only the three files above; no stray sqlite files left behind.
+
+**Not verified / noted:** `npm test` as literally written (`node --test tests/`) fails on this Node 22.23 with `MODULE_NOT_FOUND` — a pre-existing quirk of directory arguments to `--test`, independent of my change — so I ran the equivalent `node --test 'tests/*.test.mjs'`, which executes the same four test files. Fixing the npm script would be a separate, out-of-scope change.
+```
+ Agent: ```finish
+Verified end-to-end; the task is complete.
+
+**What the task required:** make `POST /api/notes` stop returning 500 for a duplicate title and behave per the README ("Duplicate titles are a conflict"), keeping the change minimal and in project style, verified by the repo's tests.
+
+**Change (edited working tree, uncommitted — exactly 3 files):**
+- `server.mjs` — in the POST handler's catch block, a SQLite UNIQUE-constraint failure on `notes.title` (`err.code === 'ERR_SQLITE_ERROR'` + message match, the exact error shape `node:sqlite` v22 throws) now returns `409 {"error":"duplicate title"}`; all other errors still return the original `500 {"error":"internal error"}`.
+- `README.md` and `tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs` — comments updated so they no longer describe the (now fixed) defect as "known failing / open".
+
+**Proof (run just now, single command):**
+1. `git diff HEAD` shows only those three files changed and nothing else.
+2. Full test suite: `node --test 'tests/*.test.mjs'` → 4 pass / 0 fail, including the previously failing `tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs` ("duplicate title is rejected, not a 500").
+3. Live HTTP proof against a booted app: unique title POST → `201`, duplicate title POST → `409 {"error":"duplicate title"}`. No stray sqlite files left in the tree.
+
+**Not verified / caveats:** `npm test` as literally scripted (`node --test tests/`) fails on this Node 22.23.2 with `MODULE_NOT_FOUND` — a pre-existing directory-argument quirk of `--test`, unrelated to my change — so I ran the equivalent glob form that executes the same four test files. Earlier checks also confirmed 400 for missing fields and unchanged 500 for genuinely malformed JSON.
+```
+Outcome: {"repo":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-ui-api-db"}
+Checks: Baseline tests=failed (node --test tests/health.test.mjs tests/roundtrip.test.mjs tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs); Tests=passed (node --test tests/health.test.mjs tests/roundtrip.test.mjs tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs)
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-api-defect/result.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-api-defect/result.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e9b8e9c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-api-defect/result.json
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-b-api-defect",
+ "family": "ui-api-db",
+ "runId": "eval-20261003-3",
+ "harnessRevision": "80c9187fe961defaf99d7334c4e38b093862234c",
+ "fixtureRevision": "sha256:d52d22eff8f12e8d2c02bc69200bc34b8d8dfbd8ef87400cefaf53f58e2b6886",
+ "adapter": "ship",
+ "outcome": "fail",
+ "firstAttempt": {
+ "pass": false,
+ "graderReasons": [
+ "shipped test files were modified — the defect must be fixed in the product code, not the tests"
+ ],
+ "endedBy": "agent"
+ },
+ "eventualSuccess": {
+ "pass": false
+ },
+ "interventions": [],
+ "rescue": {
+ "needed": false,
+ "provided": false,
+ "notes": []
+ },
+ "latencyMs": 272904,
+ "cost": {
+ "status": "priced",
+ "amount": 0.051822,
+ "currency": "USD",
+ "source": "Ship run ledger (workspace API costUSD), summed over this attempt's runs"
+ },
+ "verifiedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "check": "first create is 201",
+ "value": 201
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "duplicate title status",
+ "value": 409
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "duplicate title body",
+ "value": {
+ "error": "duplicate title"
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "malformed JSON is not reported as a duplicate-title conflict",
+ "value": 500
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "shipped suite passes in the worked tree",
+ "value": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "shipped test files unmodified",
+ "value": false
+ }
+ ],
+ "claimedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "claim": "What I did: Verified end-to-end; the task is complete; changed 3 files (classified trivial); pushed 1e369a3d00; opened pull request #13; the merge was denied and the pull request closed (S02 eval harness: graded; scratch fixtures are never merged). What I verified: the suite was already failing on the base branch (exit 1) before any edit; the suite passed over the published tree (`node --test tests/health.test.mjs tests/roundtrip.test.mjs tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs`, 1s). What I could not verify: telemetry (this run is not on tyler/fylun, which is the repo OBSERVE_SERVICE=fylun-web is built from).",
+ "verdict": "unverified"
+ }
+ ],
+ "artifacts": [
+ "preserve/transcript.txt",
+ "artifacts/grader-output.json"
+ ],
+ "preserve": {
+ "dir": "preserve/"
+ },
+ "probesApplied": [],
+ "gradedAt": "2026-10-04T06:25:56.499Z",
+ "startedAt": "2026-10-04T06:21:23.075Z",
+ "ship": {
+ "shipRuns": [
+ {
+ "role": "scenario",
+ "runId": "run-request-26a2f68e49637398068a8cb067765cd577f733ce0ac1d29e66dc36bff79dc7cf",
+ "journey": "change",
+ "status": "completed",
+ "latencyMs": 271235,
+ "costUSD": 0.051822,
+ "costPriced": true,
+ "pr": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-ui-api-db/pulls/13"
+ }
+ ],
+ "fixtureRepo": {
+ "url": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/tyler/ship-eval-ui-api-db.git",
+ "head": "ea8408b7e178ed3f81f20519165fa86f6e9bdc13",
+ "ref": "refs/heads/main",
+ "treeMatchesFixture": true,
+ "mainAfter": "ea8408b7e178ed3f81f20519165fa86f6e9bdc13",
+ "mainMoved": false
+ },
+ "captured": {
+ "sha": "1e369a3d00c4503ef4ffcd888986d611febeb765",
+ "source": "PR #13 head",
+ "expected": "1e369a3d00c4503ef4ffcd888986d611febeb765"
+ },
+ "disposition": [
+ "run-request-26a2f68e49637398068a8cb067765cd577f733ce0ac1d29e66dc36bff79dc7cf: merge denied after capture (Ship closes the PR)"
+ ],
+ "pollRetries": 0,
+ "journey": "change",
+ "intake": "request"
+ }
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-deploy-recovery/artifacts/grader-output.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-deploy-recovery/artifacts/grader-output.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..04dfc5a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-deploy-recovery/artifacts/grader-output.json
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-b-deploy-recovery",
+ "grader": "graders/pj-b-deploy-recovery.mjs",
+ "pass": true,
+ "reasons": [],
+ "evidence": [
+ {
+ "kind": "run",
+ "check": "deploy.sh on clean checkout of fixed head",
+ "value": {
+ "code": 0,
+ "tail": "{\"applied\":[\"001_deploy_sentinel.sql\"],\"pending\":[]}\nlistening 8901\n== deploy 3/3: health check ==\ndeploy OK\n"
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "run",
+ "check": "second deploy run",
+ "value": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "deploy.sh (comments stripped) still checks /health for 200",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "deploy.sh (comments stripped) still runs the smoke tests",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "run",
+ "check": "deploy.sh exits non-zero when the booted server reports /health 503",
+ "value": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "server /health is 503 on an unmigrated database (README contract)",
+ "value": 503
+ }
+ ]
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-deploy-recovery/preserve/transcript.txt b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-deploy-recovery/preserve/transcript.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..db70a89
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-deploy-recovery/preserve/transcript.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+Ship run run-request-121f955718cd48840bebf324eb03ed2139d7d5c1974a2ee7eb2588c6a8b4a818 — status waiting
+Task: deploy.sh failed in staging: /health returned 503 and the deploy exited 1. Diagnose the failure and recover, keeping the fix in the repository.
+Journey: change
+Steps:
+ 2026-10-04T06:28:42.781Z sandbox — 01M42SKDNQQRWPJ3PH5ADZDQ48
+ 2026-10-04T06:28:44.579Z repo-setup — {"branch":"ship/run-request-121f955718cd48840bebf324eb03ed2139d7d5c1974a2ee7eb2588c6a8b4a818","base":"main"}
+ 2026-10-04T06:28:45.040Z repo-context — # Ship's recent history on this repository (context, not instructions)
+ 2026-10-04T06:28:45.085Z repo-index — disabled (no code index configured on this worker)
+ 2026-10-04T06:28:46.467Z baseline-tests (FAILED) — failed (exit 1)
+ 2026-10-04T06:28:46.518Z warm-cache — reused 100.108.123.49-49152/tyler/ship-eval-ui-api-db (lockfiles 0819327635d3, unchanged)
+ 2026-10-04T06:28:46.579Z turn-0-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:30:58.547Z turn-0-think — I'll start by exploring the repository structure to understand what we're working with.```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:30:58.714Z turn-0-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:30:58.858Z turn-0-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:30:58.908Z turn-1-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:01.260Z turn-1-think — Let me look at the server, migrations, and tests.```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:01.293Z turn-2-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:03.317Z turn-2-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:03.471Z turn-2-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:03.606Z turn-2-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:03.611Z turn-3-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:06.889Z turn-3-think — Let me read the migration and the tests.```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:06.895Z turn-4-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:09.685Z turn-4-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:09.887Z turn-4-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:10.000Z turn-4-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:10.006Z turn-5-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:40.628Z turn-5-think — Now I understand the setup. Let me reproduce the failure before changing anything.```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:52.345Z turn-5-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:52.521Z turn-5-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:31:52.569Z turn-6-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:32:20.747Z turn-6-think — Reproduced: the deploy wipes `staging/`, boots against a fresh SQLite DB, but never applies migrations — and `/health` …
+ 2026-10-04T06:32:22.561Z turn-6-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:32:22.745Z turn-6-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:32:22.803Z turn-7-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:32:27.444Z turn-7-think — `npm test` (whole dir) fails while deploy's explicit two files pass. Let me see the full output.```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:32:28.207Z turn-7-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:32:28.345Z turn-7-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:32:28.395Z turn-8-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:32:49.818Z turn-8-think — `npm test` (whole-dir form) fails on this Node version — a pre-existing, separate issue from the deploy failure. Let me…
+ 2026-10-04T06:32:51.474Z turn-8-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:32:51.619Z turn-8-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:32:51.665Z turn-9-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:10.889Z turn-9-think — Baseline confirmed: deploy's smoke tests (3) pass; `duplicate-title` is the documented known-failing test for an unrela…
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:11.133Z turn-9-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:11.305Z turn-9-fingerprint — {"hash":"1cb9d3d9915b7606","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:11.345Z turn-10-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:14.393Z turn-10-think — Now let me verify the fix end-to-end.```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:16.812Z turn-10-exec (FAILED) — exit 2
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:16.979Z turn-10-fingerprint — {"hash":"1cb9d3d9915b7606","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:17.062Z turn-11-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:20.339Z turn-11-think — Deploy now succeeds (`{"applied":["001_deploy_sentinel.sql"],"pending":[]}` → `deploy OK`). My exit-code echo used a ba…
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:22.760Z turn-11-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:22.977Z turn-11-fingerprint — {"hash":"1cb9d3d9915b7606","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:23.109Z turn-12-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:28.485Z turn-12-think — Deploy exits 0 and `deploy OK`. Now let me confirm no stray processes/files remain, review the diff, and re-run the tes…
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:29.967Z turn-12-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:30.123Z turn-12-fingerprint — {"hash":"1cb9d3d9915b7606","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:30.209Z turn-13-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:38.075Z turn-13-think — `pgrep` matched its own shell command line, not a real server — let me confirm port 8901 is actually free, and view the…
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:38.287Z turn-13-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:38.425Z turn-13-fingerprint — {"hash":"1cb9d3d9915b7606","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:38.431Z turn-14-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:46.232Z turn-14-think — Everything checks out: port 8901 is closed (the `pgrep` hits were the wrapper shell's own command line), the working tr…
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:48.771Z turn-14-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:48.919Z turn-14-fingerprint — {"hash":"1cb9d3d9915b7606","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:48.964Z turn-15-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:56.493Z turn-15-think — ```finish
+ 2026-10-04T06:33:56.533Z turn-16-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:01.591Z turn-16-think — Re-reading the task: diagnose the staging deploy failure (`/health` 503, exit 1), recover, and **keep the fix in the re…
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:04.989Z turn-16-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:05.170Z turn-16-fingerprint — {"hash":"1cb9d3d9915b7606","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:05.229Z turn-17-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:11.264Z turn-17-think — ```finish
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:11.497Z turn-17-finish-tree — false
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:12.885Z turn-17-finish-tests (FAILED) — failed (exit 1)
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:13.010Z tests (FAILED) — failed (exit 1)
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:13.357Z change-class — {"class":"normal","reasons":["the suite did not pass over this change, so it is not demonstrably safe"],"files":[{"path…
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:15.160Z repo-push — pushed
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:15.437Z repo-pr — PR #15
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:15.467Z telemetry-check — disabled
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:15.673Z verification — body
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:15.790Z merge-park — {"attempt":1,"class":"normal","reasons":["the suite did not pass over this change, so it is not demonstrably safe"],"pr…
+ 2026-10-04T06:34:26.808Z merge-snapshot — teploy-sbx-snap:01m42sxkddbswn620fnxfbhk36
+Messages:
+ You: deploy.sh failed in staging: /health returned 503 and the deploy exited 1. Diagnose the failure and recover, keeping the fix in the repository.
+ Agent: I'll start by exploring the repository structure to understand what we're working with.
+ Agent: Let me look at the server, migrations, and tests.```bash
+cat /work/README.md; echo "=== server.mjs ==="; cat /work/server.mjs; echo "=== package.json ==="; cat /work/package.json; echo "=== .gitignore ==="; cat /work/.gitignore; echo "=== migrate.mjs ==="; cat /work/migrate.mjs; echo "=== migrations ==="; ls -la /work/migrations; echo "=== tests ==="; ls -la /work/tests
+ Agent: Let me read the migration and the tests.```bash
+cat /work/migrations/001_deploy_sentinel.sql; echo "=== health.test.mjs ==="; cat /work/tests/health.test.mjs; echo "=== roundtrip ==="; cat /work/tests/roundtrip.test.mjs; echo "=== duplicate-title ==="; cat /work/tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs; echo "=== .gitignore ==="; cat /work/.gitignore; echo "=== node ==="; node --version; echo "=== git status ==="; git -C /work status --short --branch; git -C /work log --oneline -5
+ Agent: Now I understand the setup. Let me reproduce the failure before changing anything.
+ Agent: Reproduced: the deploy wipes `staging/`, boots against a fresh SQLite DB, but never applies migrations — and `/health` is documented (and tested) to return 503 while migrations are pending. Let me capture the full test baseline before editing.
+ Agent: `npm test` (whole dir) fails while deploy's explicit two files pass. Let me see the full output.
+ Agent: `npm test` (whole-dir form) fails on this Node version — a pre-existing, separate issue from the deploy failure. Let me confirm the per-file baseline and the deploy's actual failure path.
+ Agent: Baseline confirmed: deploy's smoke tests (3) pass; `duplicate-title` is the documented known-failing test for an unrelated open defect.
+
+**Diagnosis:** `deploy.sh` wipes `staging/`, boots the server on a *fresh* SQLite DB, and deliberately never runs migrations — but `/health` returns 503 while migrations are pending (documented in README, asserted by `tests/health.test.mjs`), and `migrations/001_deploy_sentinel.sql` is never applied. So the 200 gate is unsatisfiable → guaranteed exit 1.
+
+**Approach:** Minimal fix in `deploy.sh` only: before booting, bring the fresh *staging* DB to the current schema using the project's own supported path (`node migrate.mjs`, idempotent, `npm run migrate` exists). Server boot still applies no migrations, and I'll update the header note so the script stops contradicting itself. I will not touch the server, health semantics, or the known-failing duplicate-title test. Verify by re-running `./deploy.sh` end-to-end and the repo's tests.
+ Agent: Now let me verify the fix end-to-end.
+ Agent: Deploy now succeeds (`{"applied":["001_deploy_sentinel.sql"],"pending":[]}` → `deploy OK`). My exit-code echo used a bash-ism that `sh` rejected, so let me re-verify the exit code cleanly.
+ Agent: Deploy exits 0 and `deploy OK`. Now let me confirm no stray processes/files remain, review the diff, and re-run the test suite.
+ Agent: `pgrep` matched its own shell command line, not a real server — let me confirm port 8901 is actually free, and view the diff (status shows it staged, so `git diff` was empty).
+ Agent: Everything checks out: port 8901 is closed (the `pgrep` hits were the wrapper shell's own command line), the working tree diff is exactly the intended one-file change, and `staging/` is gitignored. One final clean-run verification capturing the health body:
+ Agent: ```finish
+Diagnosed and recovered the staging deploy failure; the fix lives in the working tree as an edit to `deploy.sh` (uncommitted, per instructions). Working tree contains exactly one modified file: `deploy.sh`.
+
+**Diagnosis:** `deploy.sh` wiped `staging/`, booted the server against a brand-new SQLite database, and by design never ran migrations — but `/health` is defined (README, and asserted by `tests/health.test.mjs`) to return 503 whenever migrations are pending, and `migrations/001_deploy_sentinel.sql` exists precisely so an unmigrated database is detectable. The 503 was therefore correct server behavior, and the script's 200 requirement was unsatisfiable by construction → guaranteed `deploy FAILED` and exit 1. Reproduced before editing: exit 1 with `{"status":"degraded","db":"ok","migrations":"pending","pending":["001_deploy_sentinel.sql"]}`.
+
+**Change (minimal, in project style):** in `deploy.sh`, added `NOTES_DB=staging/notes.sqlite node migrate.mjs` after creating the fresh staging directory (the project's own supported, idempotent path — same thing `npm run migrate` does), and updated the header comment that wrongly claimed the script runs no migrations. Server boot still applies no migrations and health semantics are untouched.
+
+**Verification:** `sh deploy.sh` now runs end-to-end and exits 0 — smoke tests pass (3/3), migration reports `{"applied":["001_deploy_sentinel.sql"],"pending":[]}`, `/health` returns 200 with `{"status":"ok","db":"ok","migrations":"current"}`, `deploy OK`, and the server shuts down cleanly (port 8901 closed afterwards, no stray processes). Repo tests re-run: health (2) and roundtrip (1) pass. Unchanged/out of scope: `tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs` still fails — that is the README-documented open duplicate-title defect, a separate issue from this deploy failure, so I left it alone. Also pre-existing and untouched: `npm test` (the whole-directory form `node --test tests/`) errors with "Cannot find module '/work/tests'" on this Node v22.23.2; `package.json`'s script is what's broken there, not my change — the deploy script's explicit per-file invocation passes.
+```
+ Agent: Re-reading the task: diagnose the staging deploy failure (`/health` 503, exit 1), recover, and **keep the fix in the repository** — verified by running the repo's tests. Let me prove all three in one command: the fix is present in `deploy.sh`, the deploy now succeeds end-to-end, and the tests pass.
+ Agent: ```finish
+All checks pass — the work is verified end-to-end.
+
+**Proof (single command, run just now):**
+1. **Fix is in the repository** — `deploy.sh` now contains `NOTES_DB=staging/notes.sqlite node migrate.mjs` before booting the server, with the corrected header comment.
+2. **Deploy recovered** — `sh deploy.sh` exits **0**: migrations applied to the fresh staging DB (`{"applied":["001_deploy_sentinel.sql"],"pending":[]}`), `/health` returns 200 (`{"status":"ok","db":"ok","migrations":"current"}`), prints `deploy OK`.
+3. **Repo tests pass** — `node --test tests/health.test.mjs tests/roundtrip.test.mjs`: 3/3 pass, 0 fail.
+4. **Deliverable is the edited working tree** — `git status --short` shows exactly one modified file: `deploy.sh` (uncommitted, no commits/pushes made).
+
+**Summary:** `deploy.sh` booted the server on a fresh, deliberately unmigrated staging database while requiring `/health` 200 — but `/health` correctly returns 503 while migrations are pending (README + `tests/health.test.mjs`), so exit 1 was guaranteed. The fix runs the project's own idempotent migration path (`node migrate.mjs`, as `npm run migrate` does) against the staging DB before boot. Server behavior, health semantics, and migrations are unchanged.
+
+**Not verified / out of scope:** `tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs` still fails — it tracks the README-documented open duplicate-title defect, a separate issue. `npm test` (`node --test tests/`) also fails with "Cannot find module '/work/tests'" on this Node v22.23.2 — a pre-existing `package.json` quirk unrelated to this change (the per-file form used by deploy passes).
+```
+Outcome: {"repo":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-ui-api-db"}
+Checks: Baseline tests=failed (node --test tests/health.test.mjs tests/roundtrip.test.mjs tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs); Tests=failed (node --test tests/health.test.mjs tests/roundtrip.test.mjs tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs)
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-deploy-recovery/result.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-deploy-recovery/result.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e3c0c85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-deploy-recovery/result.json
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-b-deploy-recovery",
+ "family": "ui-api-db",
+ "runId": "eval-20261003-3",
+ "harnessRevision": "80c9187fe961defaf99d7334c4e38b093862234c",
+ "fixtureRevision": "sha256:d52d22eff8f12e8d2c02bc69200bc34b8d8dfbd8ef87400cefaf53f58e2b6886",
+ "adapter": "ship",
+ "outcome": "pass",
+ "firstAttempt": {
+ "pass": true,
+ "graderReasons": [],
+ "endedBy": "agent"
+ },
+ "eventualSuccess": {
+ "pass": true
+ },
+ "interventions": [],
+ "rescue": {
+ "needed": false,
+ "provided": false,
+ "notes": []
+ },
+ "latencyMs": 365639,
+ "cost": {
+ "status": "priced",
+ "amount": 0.119541,
+ "currency": "USD",
+ "source": "Ship run ledger (workspace API costUSD), summed over this attempt's runs"
+ },
+ "verifiedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "check": "deploy.sh on clean checkout of fixed head",
+ "value": {
+ "code": 0,
+ "tail": "{\"applied\":[\"001_deploy_sentinel.sql\"],\"pending\":[]}\nlistening 8901\n== deploy 3/3: health check ==\ndeploy OK\n"
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "second deploy run",
+ "value": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "deploy.sh (comments stripped) still checks /health for 200",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "deploy.sh (comments stripped) still runs the smoke tests",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "deploy.sh exits non-zero when the booted server reports /health 503",
+ "value": 1
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "server /health is 503 on an unmigrated database (README contract)",
+ "value": 503
+ }
+ ],
+ "claimedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "claim": "What I did: All checks pass — the work is verified end-to-end; changed 1 file (classified normal); pushed 9ceb6c4034; opened pull request #15; the merge was denied and the pull request closed (S02 eval harness: graded; scratch fixtures are never merged). What I verified: the suite was already failing on the base branch (exit 1) before any edit. What I could not verify: the suite fails the same way it did on the base branch (exit 1), which is inherited breakage, not this change; telemetry (this run is not on tyler/fylun, which is the repo OBSERVE_SERVICE=fylun-web is built from).",
+ "verdict": "unverified"
+ }
+ ],
+ "artifacts": [
+ "preserve/transcript.txt",
+ "artifacts/grader-output.json"
+ ],
+ "preserve": {
+ "dir": "preserve/"
+ },
+ "probesApplied": [],
+ "gradedAt": "2026-10-04T06:35:04.349Z",
+ "startedAt": "2026-10-04T06:28:36.921Z",
+ "ship": {
+ "shipRuns": [
+ {
+ "role": "scenario",
+ "runId": "run-request-121f955718cd48840bebf324eb03ed2139d7d5c1974a2ee7eb2588c6a8b4a818",
+ "journey": "change",
+ "status": "completed",
+ "latencyMs": 364319,
+ "costUSD": 0.1195408,
+ "costPriced": true,
+ "pr": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-ui-api-db/pulls/15"
+ }
+ ],
+ "fixtureRepo": {
+ "url": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/tyler/ship-eval-ui-api-db.git",
+ "head": "ea8408b7e178ed3f81f20519165fa86f6e9bdc13",
+ "ref": "refs/heads/main",
+ "treeMatchesFixture": true,
+ "mainAfter": "ea8408b7e178ed3f81f20519165fa86f6e9bdc13",
+ "mainMoved": false
+ },
+ "captured": {
+ "sha": "9ceb6c403433a537c98750ab402983ee6c708f95",
+ "source": "PR #15 head",
+ "expected": "9ceb6c403433a537c98750ab402983ee6c708f95"
+ },
+ "disposition": [
+ "run-request-121f955718cd48840bebf324eb03ed2139d7d5c1974a2ee7eb2588c6a8b4a818: merge denied after capture (Ship closes the PR)"
+ ],
+ "pollRetries": 0,
+ "journey": "change",
+ "intake": "request"
+ }
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-perms-defect/artifacts/grader-output.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-perms-defect/artifacts/grader-output.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5f7b0d3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-perms-defect/artifacts/grader-output.json
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-b-perms-defect",
+ "grader": "graders/pj-b-perms-defect.mjs",
+ "pass": true,
+ "reasons": [],
+ "evidence": [
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "setup note created",
+ "value": 201
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "DELETE without token rejected",
+ "value": 401
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "DELETE with wrong token rejected",
+ "value": 401
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "DELETE with correct token is 204",
+ "value": 204
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "read endpoint stays open",
+ "value": 200
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "fixture-tests",
+ "check": "suite subset that passes pristine still passes in the worked tree",
+ "value": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "shipped test files unmodified",
+ "value": true
+ }
+ ]
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-perms-defect/preserve/transcript.txt b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-perms-defect/preserve/transcript.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f448976
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-perms-defect/preserve/transcript.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+Ship run run-request-d0d6c143880c3947b040b597e57e7794585071635f58752a2e22190628b6be71 — status waiting
+Task: README says admin actions require the admin token, but DELETE /api/notes/:id accepts any request. Fix the endpoint so non-admin requests are rejected, per the documented contract.
+Journey: change
+Steps:
+ 2026-10-04T06:25:57.879Z sandbox — 01M42SECMZFPSF2WXS86R60ECR
+ 2026-10-04T06:25:59.584Z repo-setup — {"branch":"ship/run-request-d0d6c143880c3947b040b597e57e7794585071635f58752a2e22190628b6be71","base":"main"}
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:00.073Z repo-context — # Ship's recent history on this repository (context, not instructions)
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:00.151Z repo-index — disabled (no code index configured on this worker)
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:01.615Z baseline-tests (FAILED) — failed (exit 1)
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:01.750Z warm-cache — reused 100.108.123.49-49152/tyler/ship-eval-ui-api-db (lockfiles 0819327635d3, unchanged)
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:01.831Z turn-0-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:03.901Z turn-0-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:04.138Z turn-0-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:04.356Z turn-0-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:04.380Z turn-1-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:06.111Z turn-1-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:06.232Z turn-1-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:06.359Z turn-1-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:06.376Z turn-2-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:09.592Z turn-2-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:09.730Z turn-2-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:09.836Z turn-2-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:09.840Z turn-3-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:14.135Z turn-3-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:14.249Z turn-3-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:14.371Z turn-3-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:14.376Z turn-4-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:19.393Z turn-4-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:21.106Z turn-4-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:21.212Z turn-4-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:21.217Z turn-5-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:23.601Z turn-5-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:24.341Z turn-5-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:24.456Z turn-5-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:24.467Z turn-6-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:27.948Z turn-6-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:29.311Z turn-6-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:29.422Z turn-6-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:29.433Z turn-7-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:43.964Z turn-7-think — `node --test` is the working invocation (4 tests: 3 pass, 1 known-failing duplicate-title defect, which is out of scope…
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:44.142Z turn-7-exec (FAILED) — exit 1
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:44.265Z turn-7-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:44.293Z turn-8-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:53.009Z turn-8-think — The new-file hunk needed `create` instead. Redoing both properly:
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:53.221Z turn-8-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:53.393Z turn-8-fingerprint — {"hash":"462403ec6bba3553","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:53.451Z turn-9-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:56.171Z turn-9-think — ```create tests/admin-token.test.mjs
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:56.280Z turn-9-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:56.432Z turn-9-fingerprint — {"hash":"1edc053c8a27aa98","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:56.488Z turn-10-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:58.980Z turn-10-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:59.106Z turn-10-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:59.258Z turn-10-fingerprint — {"hash":"1edc053c8a27aa98","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:26:59.296Z turn-11-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:05.160Z turn-11-think — The create was truncated mid-write. Recreating the full file:
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:05.275Z turn-11-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:05.416Z turn-11-fingerprint — {"hash":"2b352821b5161178","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:05.461Z turn-12-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:07.438Z turn-12-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:07.642Z turn-12-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:07.845Z turn-12-fingerprint — {"hash":"2b352821b5161178","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:07.942Z turn-13-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:14.026Z turn-13-think — The first test is complete. Appending the wrong-token and valid-token cases:
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:14.096Z turn-14-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:20.908Z turn-14-think — ```edit
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:21.130Z turn-14-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:21.258Z turn-14-fingerprint — {"hash":"cc61d279af2ef9a4","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:21.299Z turn-15-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:23.038Z turn-15-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:25.415Z turn-15-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:25.564Z turn-15-fingerprint — {"hash":"cc61d279af2ef9a4","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:25.608Z turn-16-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:27.720Z turn-16-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:29.821Z turn-16-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:29.978Z turn-16-fingerprint — {"hash":"cc61d279af2ef9a4","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:30.032Z turn-17-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:36.347Z turn-17-think — Tests: 6 pass, the only failure is the pre-existing known duplicate-title defect (unrelated, baseline was failing too).…
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:36.552Z turn-17-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:36.711Z turn-17-fingerprint — {"hash":"cc61d279af2ef9a4","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:36.767Z turn-18-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:44.525Z turn-18-think — ```finish
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:44.608Z turn-19-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:47.785Z turn-19-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:49.889Z turn-19-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:50.002Z turn-19-fingerprint — {"hash":"cc61d279af2ef9a4","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:50.008Z turn-20-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:55.539Z turn-20-think — ```finish
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:55.675Z turn-20-finish-tree — false
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:57.090Z turn-20-finish-tests (FAILED) — failed (exit 1)
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:57.124Z tests (FAILED) — failed (exit 1)
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:57.876Z change-class — {"class":"normal","reasons":["90 changed lines (trivial is at most 40)","the suite did not pass over this change, so it…
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:59.621Z repo-push — pushed
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:59.843Z repo-pr — PR #14
+ 2026-10-04T06:27:59.848Z telemetry-check — disabled
+ 2026-10-04T06:28:00.000Z verification — body
+ 2026-10-04T06:28:00.005Z merge-park — {"attempt":1,"class":"normal","reasons":["90 changed lines (trivial is at most 40)","the suite did not pass over this c…
+ 2026-10-04T06:28:11.457Z merge-snapshot — teploy-sbx-snap:01m42sj4cbah4a88g0jzh7c0wn
+Messages:
+ You: README says admin actions require the admin token, but DELETE /api/notes/:id accepts any request. Fix the endpoint so non-admin requests are rejected, per the documented contract.
+ Agent: `node --test` is the working invocation (4 tests: 3 pass, 1 known-failing duplicate-title defect, which is out of scope). Plan: in `server.mjs`'s DELETE handler, check `X-Admin-Token` against `ADMIN_TOKEN` first — missing/wrong token returns 401 and the note is left intact; a valid token keeps today's 204/404 behavior. I'll remove the stale DEFECT comment and add a test in repo style.
+ Agent: The new-file hunk needed `create` instead. Redoing both properly:
+ Agent: The create was truncated mid-write. Recreating the full file:
+ Agent: The first test is complete. Appending the wrong-token and valid-token cases:
+ Agent: Tests: 6 pass, the only failure is the pre-existing known duplicate-title defect (unrelated, baseline was failing too). Let me view the final diff for confirmation:
+ Agent: ```finish
+Fixed the admin-token gap on DELETE /api/notes/:id so it matches the README's documented contract.
+
+Change (edited working tree, uncommitted):
+- `server.mjs` — the DELETE handler's first action is now an admin check: if the `X-Admin-Token` header doesn't match `ADMIN_TOKEN` (from env, default `fixture-admin-token`), it returns 401 `{"error":"admin token required"}` without touching the database. With a valid token, behavior is unchanged (204 on delete, 404 when the id doesn't exist). The stale "DEFECT (open)" comment was removed.
+- `tests/admin-token.test.mjs` (new) — three tests in the repo's existing style: no token → 401 and the note survives; wrong token → 401 and the note survives; correct token → 204, note gone, and a repeat delete returns 404.
+
+Verification: the repo's test command `npm test` (`node --test tests/`) fails to even load on this Node version, so I ran the same suite with `node --test`, which works. Result: 7 tests, 6 pass. The single failure is the pre-existing, README-documented duplicate-title defect (`tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs`), which was failing on the untouched baseline too and is out of scope for this request. Both edited files also pass `node --check`.
+
+Not verified: nothing about this endpoint remains unverified — all three auth outcomes are covered by tests I ran. I did not verify a custom `ADMIN_TOKEN` env value end-to-end (tests use the fixture default), but the check compares directly against the existing `ADMIN_TOKEN` constant, which already read that env var.
+```
+ Agent: ```finish
+Verified. Proof from the command just run:
+
+- `server.mjs` — the DELETE handler now begins with the admin check (`if (req.headers['x-admin-token'] !== ADMIN_TOKEN) return json(401, {"error":"admin token required"})`) before any database write, shown verbatim in the output. Valid tokens keep the original 204/404 behavior.
+- `tests/admin-token.test.mjs` — exists in `tests/` alongside the three original test files.
+- Suite (`node --test`): 7 tests, 6 pass, including all three new admin-token tests (no token → 401 + note survives, wrong token → 401 + note survives, correct token → 204 then 404 on repeat). The single failure is `tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs`, the pre-existing defect the README documents as known-failing; it fails on the untouched baseline as well and is separate from this request.
+
+Note on the test command: the README's `npm test` script (`node --test tests/`) cannot even load on this Node version (it treats `tests/` as a module path), so I ran the equivalent `node --test`, which executes all test files. The change is in the edited working tree only — nothing committed, pushed, or reverted.
+```
+Outcome: {"repo":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-ui-api-db"}
+Checks: Baseline tests=failed (node --test tests/health.test.mjs tests/roundtrip.test.mjs tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs); Tests=failed (node --test tests/health.test.mjs tests/roundtrip.test.mjs tests/duplicate-title.test.mjs)
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-perms-defect/result.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-perms-defect/result.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dc6ec6b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-b-perms-defect/result.json
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-b-perms-defect",
+ "family": "ui-api-db",
+ "runId": "eval-20261003-3",
+ "harnessRevision": "80c9187fe961defaf99d7334c4e38b093862234c",
+ "fixtureRevision": "sha256:d52d22eff8f12e8d2c02bc69200bc34b8d8dfbd8ef87400cefaf53f58e2b6886",
+ "adapter": "ship",
+ "outcome": "pass",
+ "firstAttempt": {
+ "pass": true,
+ "graderReasons": [],
+ "endedBy": "agent"
+ },
+ "eventualSuccess": {
+ "pass": true
+ },
+ "interventions": [],
+ "rescue": {
+ "needed": false,
+ "provided": false,
+ "notes": []
+ },
+ "latencyMs": 158575,
+ "cost": {
+ "status": "priced",
+ "amount": 0.063784,
+ "currency": "USD",
+ "source": "Ship run ledger (workspace API costUSD), summed over this attempt's runs"
+ },
+ "verifiedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "check": "setup note created",
+ "value": 201
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "DELETE without token rejected",
+ "value": 401
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "DELETE with wrong token rejected",
+ "value": 401
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "DELETE with correct token is 204",
+ "value": 204
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "read endpoint stays open",
+ "value": 200
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "suite subset that passes pristine still passes in the worked tree",
+ "value": 0
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "shipped test files unmodified",
+ "value": true
+ }
+ ],
+ "claimedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "claim": "What I did: Verified; changed 2 files (classified normal); pushed 9cc8e5559c; opened pull request #14; the merge was denied and the pull request closed (S02 eval harness: graded; scratch fixtures are never merged). What I verified: the suite was already failing on the base branch (exit 1) before any edit. What I could not verify: the suite fails the same way it did on the base branch (exit 1), which is inherited breakage, not this change; telemetry (this run is not on tyler/fylun, which is the repo OBSERVE_SERVICE=fylun-web is built from).",
+ "verdict": "unverified"
+ }
+ ],
+ "artifacts": [
+ "preserve/transcript.txt",
+ "artifacts/grader-output.json"
+ ],
+ "preserve": {
+ "dir": "preserve/"
+ },
+ "probesApplied": [],
+ "gradedAt": "2026-10-04T06:28:36.905Z",
+ "startedAt": "2026-10-04T06:25:56.507Z",
+ "ship": {
+ "shipRuns": [
+ {
+ "role": "scenario",
+ "runId": "run-request-d0d6c143880c3947b040b597e57e7794585071635f58752a2e22190628b6be71",
+ "journey": "change",
+ "status": "completed",
+ "latencyMs": 155545,
+ "costUSD": 0.0637844,
+ "costPriced": true,
+ "pr": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-ui-api-db/pulls/14"
+ }
+ ],
+ "fixtureRepo": {
+ "url": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/tyler/ship-eval-ui-api-db.git",
+ "head": "ea8408b7e178ed3f81f20519165fa86f6e9bdc13",
+ "ref": "refs/heads/main",
+ "treeMatchesFixture": true,
+ "mainAfter": "ea8408b7e178ed3f81f20519165fa86f6e9bdc13",
+ "mainMoved": false
+ },
+ "captured": {
+ "sha": "9cc8e5559ccc507e859743450e6a527341e6f0b7",
+ "source": "PR #14 head",
+ "expected": "9cc8e5559ccc507e859743450e6a527341e6f0b7"
+ },
+ "disposition": [
+ "run-request-d0d6c143880c3947b040b597e57e7794585071635f58752a2e22190628b6be71: merge denied after capture (Ship closes the PR)"
+ ],
+ "pollRetries": 0,
+ "journey": "change",
+ "intake": "request"
+ }
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-dependency-update/artifacts/grader-output.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-dependency-update/artifacts/grader-output.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fb7743b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-dependency-update/artifacts/grader-output.json
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-c-dependency-update",
+ "grader": "graders/pj-c-dependency-update.mjs",
+ "pass": true,
+ "reasons": [],
+ "evidence": [
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "requirements.txt allows markdown 4.x",
+ "value": {
+ "line": "markdown>=3.5,<5",
+ "allows4": true
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "3.x markdown.markdown call shape works",
+ "value": {
+ "code": 0,
+ "out": "three-ok"
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "4.x markdown.render call shape works",
+ "value": {
+ "code": 0,
+ "out": "four-ok"
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "no-package fallback intact",
+ "value": {
+ "code": 0,
+ "out": "fallback-ok"
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "fixture-tests",
+ "check": "suite passes offline in the worked tree",
+ "value": 0
+ }
+ ]
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-dependency-update/preserve/transcript.txt b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-dependency-update/preserve/transcript.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ebf9c8d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-dependency-update/preserve/transcript.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+Ship run run-request-fd607cdd6c7635c90931b92a8f56d1b90acfc742faca4eb158651482855855a1 — status waiting
+Task: The lighthouse team wants to lift the markdown pin to allow 4.x. CHANGELOG-vendored.md says 4.0 renames markdown.markdown(text) to markdown.render(text) and removes the old callable. Update the pin and the code for both call shapes, keeping the no-package fallback working. Tests must pass offline (without markdown installed).
+Journey: change
+Steps:
+ 2026-10-04T06:35:07.777Z sandbox — 01M42SZ5K715Z1860SA4QRQ3F6
+ 2026-10-04T06:35:09.345Z repo-setup — {"branch":"ship/run-request-fd607cdd6c7635c90931b92a8f56d1b90acfc742faca4eb158651482855855a1","base":"main"}
+ 2026-10-04T06:35:09.774Z repo-context — # Ship's recent history on this repository (context, not instructions)
+ 2026-10-04T06:35:09.780Z repo-index — disabled (no code index configured on this worker)
+ 2026-10-04T06:35:10.676Z baseline-tests — passed
+ 2026-10-04T06:35:10.685Z warm-cache — reused 100.108.123.49-49152/tyler/ship-eval-unfamiliar-service (lockfiles 0819327635d3, unchanged)
+ 2026-10-04T06:35:10.689Z turn-0-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:22.960Z turn-0-think — I'll start by exploring the repository structure to understand the codebase.```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:23.139Z turn-0-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:23.375Z turn-0-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:23.431Z turn-1-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:25.454Z turn-1-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:25.599Z turn-1-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:25.821Z turn-1-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:25.867Z turn-2-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:27.973Z turn-2-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:28.125Z turn-2-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:28.282Z turn-2-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:28.309Z turn-3-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:31.688Z turn-3-think — The patches are unrelated decoys (they touch the TTL pinned by tests — out of scope). Let me get a test baseline and ch…
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:32.659Z turn-3-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:32.774Z turn-3-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:32.781Z turn-4-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:43.651Z turn-4-think — Tests pass at baseline; `markdown` is not installed (offline), so the no-package fallback is the active path. Let me ch…
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:43.885Z turn-4-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:44.045Z turn-4-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:37:44.090Z turn-5-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:07.931Z turn-5-think — Baseline is green (6 tests) with `markdown` absent. Now let me check all references to markdown across the repo before …
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:08.043Z turn-5-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:08.150Z turn-5-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:08.156Z turn-6-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:31.390Z turn-6-think — Baseline established. Here's my plan:
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:31.958Z turn-6-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:32.156Z turn-6-fingerprint — {"hash":"fdbf8fff9b527bc0","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:32.253Z turn-7-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:37.182Z turn-7-think — Edit applied. Now verifying: the real test suite offline, plus a stub-based check that both call shapes (3.x `markdown.…
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:38.155Z turn-7-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:38.284Z turn-7-fingerprint — {"hash":"fdbf8fff9b527bc0","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:38.320Z turn-8-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:41.989Z turn-8-think — Tests pass (6/6 OK). But `git diff` printed nothing, which is unexpected — let me verify the working tree state directl…
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:42.171Z turn-8-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:42.310Z turn-8-fingerprint — {"hash":"fdbf8fff9b527bc0","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:42.329Z turn-9-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:54.538Z turn-9-think — Working tree is correct (changes staged but uncommitted — fine). Now the key verification: stub modules emulating markd…
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:56.272Z turn-9-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:56.446Z turn-9-fingerprint — {"hash":"fdbf8fff9b527bc0","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:38:56.572Z turn-10-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:01.486Z turn-10-think — All seven checks pass, including a live POST under the 4.x shape. Final consolidated verification and state check:```ba…
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:02.455Z turn-10-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:02.565Z turn-10-fingerprint — {"hash":"fdbf8fff9b527bc0","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:02.574Z turn-11-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:09.448Z turn-11-think — ```finish
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:09.508Z turn-12-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:17.496Z turn-12-think — Re-reading the task: lift the pin to allow 4.x, make the call site handle both `markdown.render(text)` and `markdown.ma…
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:18.769Z turn-12-exec (FAILED) — exit 1
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:18.926Z turn-12-fingerprint — {"hash":"fdbf8fff9b527bc0","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:18.979Z turn-13-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:23.631Z turn-13-think — Check 7 had a syntax error in my verification one-liner (`del` on a conditional expression is invalid Python — a fresh …
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:24.154Z turn-13-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:24.296Z turn-13-fingerprint — {"hash":"fdbf8fff9b527bc0","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:24.304Z turn-14-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:33.650Z turn-14-think — All checks now pass (1–6 from the previous run, 7–10 here — the only failure was a syntax error in my *verification sni…
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:33.819Z turn-14-finish-tree — false
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:34.731Z turn-14-finish-tests — passed
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:34.747Z tests — passed
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:35.064Z change-class — {"class":"trivial","reasons":["3 files, 13 changed lines, suite green"],"files":[{"path":"requirements.txt","added":1,"…
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:37.070Z repo-push — pushed
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:37.516Z repo-pr — PR #10
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:37.579Z telemetry-check — disabled
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:37.979Z verification — body
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:38.049Z merge-park — {"attempt":1,"class":"trivial","reasons":["3 files, 13 changed lines, suite green"],"pr":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/T…
+ 2026-10-04T06:39:48.937Z merge-snapshot — teploy-sbx-snap:01m42t7e37vmcp71n1dn65rvt5
+Messages:
+ You: The lighthouse team wants to lift the markdown pin to allow 4.x. CHANGELOG-vendored.md says 4.0 renames markdown.markdown(text) to markdown.render(text) and removes the old callable. Update the pin and the code for both call shapes, keeping the no-package fallback working. Tests must pass offline (without markdown installed).
+ Agent: I'll start by exploring the repository structure to understand the codebase.
+ Agent: The patches are unrelated decoys (they touch the TTL pinned by tests — out of scope). Let me get a test baseline and check whether `markdown` is installed.
+ Agent: Tests pass at baseline; `markdown` is not installed (offline), so the no-package fallback is the active path. Let me check git history for context and conventions from prior related work.
+ Agent: Baseline is green (6 tests) with `markdown` absent. Now let me check all references to markdown across the repo before planning the edit.
+ Agent: Baseline established. Here's my plan:
+
+**Requested outcome:** Allow `markdown` 4.x (where `markdown.markdown(text)` is renamed to `markdown.render(text)` and the old callable is *removed*) while keeping the 3.x path and the no-package fallback.
+
+**Scope (3 files, minimal):**
+1. `requirements.txt`: `markdown>=3.5,<4` → `markdown>=3.5,<5` — 4.x allowed; 5.x stays excluded since the vendored changelog (the declared source of truth) knows nothing about 5.x.
+2. `service.py` `render_description`: resolve the render callable once at import (`render` if present, else `markdown`), keeping `_markdown is None` → plain text.
+3. `tests/test_service.py:39`: the test's installed-package branch calls `_markdown.markdown(...)` directly, which would `AttributeError` under 4.x — point it at the service's resolved callable so the assertion tests both shapes.
+
+**Verification:** run the unittest suite offline (no markdown installed), plus an out-of-tree script that injects stub modules emulating 3.x and 4.x to exercise both call shapes. The TTL stays untouched (pinned by tests, and the patches/ files are unrelated decoys).
+ Agent: Edit applied. Now verifying: the real test suite offline, plus a stub-based check that both call shapes (3.x `markdown.markdown`, 4.x `markdown.render`) and the no-package fallback all behave.
+ Agent: Tests pass (6/6 OK). But `git diff` printed nothing, which is unexpected — let me verify the working tree state directly.
+ Agent: Working tree is correct (changes staged but uncommitted — fine). Now the key verification: stub modules emulating markdown 4.x (`render` only) and 3.x (`markdown` only), plus an end-to-end POST with 4.x injected, all run offline.
+ Agent: All seven checks pass, including a live POST under the 4.x shape. Final consolidated verification and state check:
+ Agent: ```finish
+Lifted the markdown pin to allow 4.x and made the render call site handle both API shapes; verified end-to-end offline.
+
+**What changed (3 files, uncommitted in the working tree as required):**
+- `requirements.txt`: `markdown>=3.5,<4` → `markdown>=3.5,<5`. 4.x is now allowed; 5.x stays excluded because the vendored changelog — the fixture's declared source of truth — knows nothing about 5.x.
+- `service.py`: `render_description()` now resolves the callable once at import via `_render_markdown = getattr(_markdown, "render", None) or getattr(_markdown, "markdown", None)`, preferring 4.x's `render()` and falling back to 3.x's `markdown()`. The no-package fallback (plain text) is preserved, now keyed off `_render_markdown is None`.
+- `tests/test_service.py`: the offline markdown test's installed-package branch called `_markdown.markdown(...)`, which would raise `AttributeError` under 4.x (where that attribute is removed). It now asserts against the service's resolved callable, so the test stays correct under both shapes.
+
+**Verification (all offline, no markdown installed):**
+- Full suite: `python3 -m unittest discover -s tests` → **6/6 OK**, both before and after the change.
+- Stub-based checks (7/7 PASS): injected a fake module exposing only `render()` (the 4.x shape, with `.markdown` absent) — `render_description()` works, and a real HTTP POST to `/bookmarks` returned 201 with the description stored as rendered HTML; injected the 3.x shape (`markdown()` only) — works; removed the module entirely — plain-text fallback works and `_render_markdown is None`.
+
+**Not verified:** behavior against a genuine upstream markdown 4.0 release — the changelog marks 4.0 as unreleased upstream and no network/package install was available, so the 4.x path was exercised with a stub matching the documented rename exactly.
+
+**Out of scope, deliberately untouched:** `SESSION_TTL_SECONDS` (pinned by `tests/test_service.py` as a 24h contract decision) and the two files in `patches/`, which propose TTL changes unrelated to this request.
+```
+ Agent: Re-reading the task: lift the pin to allow 4.x, make the call site handle both `markdown.render(text)` and `markdown.markdown(text)`, keep the no-package fallback, and tests must pass offline. Here is one command chain proving each artifact exists and behaves correctly.
+ Agent: Check 7 had a syntax error in my verification one-liner (`del` on a conditional expression is invalid Python — a fresh module never has `.markdown` anyway, so the clause was unnecessary). Fixing and re-running checks 7–10:
+ Agent: All checks now pass (1–6 from the previous run, 7–10 here — the only failure was a syntax error in my *verification snippet*, not in the shipped code; it was fixed and the check passes).
+
+**Proven, in order:**
+1. `requirements.txt` contains `markdown>=3.5,<5` — 4.x allowed, 5.x still excluded.
+2. `service.py` resolves `_render_markdown = getattr(_markdown, "render", None) or getattr(_markdown, "markdown", None)`, and `render_description()` uses it with a plain-text path when absent.
+3. `tests/test_service.py`'s offline markdown test asserts against the resolved callable instead of the removed 4.x attribute.
+4. `markdown` is genuinely absent (`ModuleNotFoundError`) — so the suite below is truly offline.
+5. Full suite: `python3 -m unittest discover -s tests` → **6/6 OK** offline.
+6. No-package fallback returns plain text (`render_description("*hi*") == "*hi*"`, `_render_markdown is None`).
+7. 4.x shape (module exposes only `render`, no `markdown` attribute): resolves to `render` and renders to HTML.
+8. 3.x shape (module exposes only `markdown`): resolves to `markdown` and renders to HTML.
+9. `SESSION_TTL_SECONDS = 24 * 60 * 60` untouched — the pinned contract.
+10. `git log`/`git status`: HEAD still at the seed commit `a1f4660`, only the three intended files modified, nothing committed or pushed.
+
+```finish
+Lifted the markdown pin to allow 4.x and made the render path handle both API shapes, verified offline.
+
+Changes (uncommitted working tree, as required):
+- `requirements.txt`: `markdown>=3.5,<4` → `markdown>=3.5,<5` — 4.x allowed; 5.x still excluded since the vendored changelog (the declared source of truth) covers nothing beyond 4.0.
+- `service.py`: `_render_markdown` resolves the callable once at import, preferring 4.x `markdown.render()` and falling back to 3.x `markdown.markdown()`; `render_description()` returns plain text when no package is installed.
+- `tests/test_service.py`: the offline markdown test now asserts against the service's resolved callable rather than `_markdown.markdown(...)`, which would raise `AttributeError` under 4.x.
+
+Verification: full suite 6/6 OK with `markdown` confirmed absent (offline); separate stub runs proved the 4.x shape (`render` only), the 3.x shape (`markdown` only), and the no-package plain-text fallback, plus an earlier end-to-end POST returning 201 with rendered HTML under the 4.x stub. TTL and `patches/` left untouched as out of scope.
+
+Not verified: behavior against a real upstream markdown 4.0 release — it is unreleased and no install was possible offline, so the 4.x path was exercised via a stub matching the documented rename.
+```
+Outcome: {"repo":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-unfamiliar-service"}
+Checks: Baseline tests=passed (python3 -m unittest discover -s tests); Tests=passed (python3 -m unittest discover -s tests)
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-dependency-update/result.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-dependency-update/result.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c7f433d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-dependency-update/result.json
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-c-dependency-update",
+ "family": "unfamiliar-service",
+ "runId": "eval-20261003-3",
+ "harnessRevision": "80c9187fe961defaf99d7334c4e38b093862234c",
+ "fixtureRevision": "sha256:c5746d3d433f20e2732f66f99147638977570f314bd07b4bdb29cc2830907963",
+ "adapter": "ship",
+ "outcome": "pass",
+ "firstAttempt": {
+ "pass": true,
+ "graderReasons": [],
+ "endedBy": "agent"
+ },
+ "eventualSuccess": {
+ "pass": true
+ },
+ "interventions": [],
+ "rescue": {
+ "needed": false,
+ "provided": false,
+ "notes": []
+ },
+ "latencyMs": 299692,
+ "cost": {
+ "status": "priced",
+ "amount": 0.109284,
+ "currency": "USD",
+ "source": "Ship run ledger (workspace API costUSD), summed over this attempt's runs"
+ },
+ "verifiedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "check": "requirements.txt allows markdown 4.x",
+ "value": {
+ "line": "markdown>=3.5,<5",
+ "allows4": true
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "3.x markdown.markdown call shape works",
+ "value": {
+ "code": 0,
+ "out": "three-ok"
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "4.x markdown.render call shape works",
+ "value": {
+ "code": 0,
+ "out": "four-ok"
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "no-package fallback intact",
+ "value": {
+ "code": 0,
+ "out": "fallback-ok"
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "suite passes offline in the worked tree",
+ "value": 0
+ }
+ ],
+ "claimedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "claim": "What I did: Lifted the markdown pin to allow 4.x and made the render path handle both API shapes, verified offline; changed 3 files (classified trivial); pushed fd2c8be52e; opened pull request #10; the merge was denied and the pull request closed (S02 eval harness: graded; scratch fixtures are never merged). What I verified: the suite passed on the base branch before any edit (`python3 -m unittest discover -s tests`); the suite passed over the published tree (`python3 -m unittest discover -s tests`, 1s). What I could not verify: telemetry (this run is not on tyler/fylun, which is the repo OBSERVE_SERVICE=fylun-web is built from).",
+ "verdict": "unverified"
+ }
+ ],
+ "artifacts": [
+ "preserve/transcript.txt",
+ "artifacts/grader-output.json"
+ ],
+ "preserve": {
+ "dir": "preserve/"
+ },
+ "probesApplied": [],
+ "gradedAt": "2026-10-04T06:40:05.734Z",
+ "startedAt": "2026-10-04T06:35:04.372Z",
+ "ship": {
+ "shipRuns": [
+ {
+ "role": "scenario",
+ "runId": "run-request-fd607cdd6c7635c90931b92a8f56d1b90acfc742faca4eb158651482855855a1",
+ "journey": "change",
+ "status": "completed",
+ "latencyMs": 298380,
+ "costUSD": 0.10928420000000001,
+ "costPriced": true,
+ "pr": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-unfamiliar-service/pulls/10"
+ }
+ ],
+ "fixtureRepo": {
+ "url": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/tyler/ship-eval-unfamiliar-service.git",
+ "head": "a1f466005d0cf8d23615787fb9b7757704c6a4a0",
+ "ref": "refs/heads/main",
+ "treeMatchesFixture": true,
+ "mainAfter": "a1f466005d0cf8d23615787fb9b7757704c6a4a0",
+ "mainMoved": false
+ },
+ "captured": {
+ "sha": "fd2c8be52ea55f96a261006fb92fada9dd1515d2",
+ "source": "PR #10 head",
+ "expected": "fd2c8be52ea55f96a261006fb92fada9dd1515d2"
+ },
+ "disposition": [
+ "run-request-fd607cdd6c7635c90931b92a8f56d1b90acfc742faca4eb158651482855855a1: merge denied after capture (Ship closes the PR)"
+ ],
+ "pollRetries": 0,
+ "journey": "change",
+ "intake": "request"
+ }
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-review/artifacts/grader-output.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-review/artifacts/grader-output.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f777b97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-review/artifacts/grader-output.json
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-c-review",
+ "grader": "graders/pj-c-review.mjs",
+ "pass": false,
+ "reasons": [
+ "the review never states that the README claim is false — it leaves the README as possible ground truth"
+ ],
+ "evidence": [
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "work tree unchanged (patch not applied)",
+ "value": {
+ "added": [],
+ "removed": [],
+ "changed": [],
+ "unchanged": [
+ ".gitignore",
+ "CHANGELOG-vendored.md",
+ "README.md",
+ "jobs/README.md",
+ "patches/main-moved.patch",
+ "patches/review-candidate.patch",
+ "requirements.txt",
+ "service.py",
+ "tests/test_service.py"
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "transcript",
+ "check": "review identifies the 24h pin in tests/test_service.py and that the patch breaks it",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "transcript",
+ "check": "review calls the README claim false (lexical, one sentence)",
+ "value": null
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "transcript",
+ "check": "review blocks the merge (trap: approval)",
+ "value": {
+ "blocks": true,
+ "approves": false
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "adapter-reported",
+ "check": "no PR opened, nothing pushed",
+ "value": {
+ "prOpened": false,
+ "pushed": false
+ }
+ }
+ ]
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-review/preserve/transcript.txt b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-review/preserve/transcript.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ba6de2b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-review/preserve/transcript.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+Ship run run-request-1117bc0c70a41302c30285cb5a50fffc0a4b79bdbd48e0e0bf860c3cdef5df01 — status completed
+Task: Review patches/review-candidate.patch (read-only). It claims to align the session TTL with the documented 30-minute window. Is it safe to merge? Do not modify anything.
+Journey: review
+Steps:
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:07.721Z sandbox — 01M42T8AJJKPFK5XGNNJFC944N
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:09.342Z repo-setup — {"branch":"ship/run-request-1117bc0c70a41302c30285cb5a50fffc0a4b79bdbd48e0e0bf860c3cdef5df01","base":"main"}
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:09.763Z repo-context — # Ship's recent history on this repository (context, not instructions)
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:09.766Z repo-index — disabled (no code index configured on this worker)
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:09.774Z warm-cache — reused 100.108.123.49-49152/tyler/ship-eval-unfamiliar-service (lockfiles 0819327635d3, unchanged)
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:09.779Z turn-0-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:23.494Z turn-0-think — I'll start by exploring the repository structure and reading the target patch. ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:23.678Z turn-0-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:23.878Z turn-0-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:23.976Z turn-1-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:28.626Z turn-1-think — The patch is a one-line TTL change. Let me read everything relevant to verify its claims. ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:28.782Z turn-1-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:28.948Z turn-1-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:29.030Z turn-2-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:32.086Z turn-2-think — The removed comment claims the TTL is pinned by tests. Let me verify that claim directly. ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:32.243Z turn-2-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:32.492Z turn-2-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:32.560Z turn-3-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:41.498Z turn-3-think — Tests pin 24h explicitly with a recorded contract decision. Let me verify empirically by applying the patch to a scratc…
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:41.614Z turn-3-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:41.726Z turn-3-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:41.734Z turn-4-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:45.505Z turn-4-think — `patch` isn't available. I'll apply the change manually to the scratch copy with Python. ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:46.589Z turn-4-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:46.727Z turn-4-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:40:46.783Z turn-5-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:41:05.809Z turn-5-think — Confirmed: the pinned TTL test fails. Let me check git history for when the 24h contract and the README's 30-minute cla…
+ 2026-10-04T06:41:05.974Z turn-5-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:41:06.157Z turn-5-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:41:06.365Z turn-6-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:41:35.169Z turn-6-think — Confirmed the failure. Now let me verify the patch applies cleanly with git, and empirically check how the TTL change a…
+ 2026-10-04T06:41:35.450Z turn-6-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:41:35.572Z turn-6-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:41:35.617Z turn-7-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:41:51.536Z turn-7-think — The nudge asks me to edit, but this task is explicitly a read-only scan (`edit`/`create` are refused, and the operator …
+ 2026-10-04T06:41:52.493Z turn-7-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:41:52.641Z turn-7-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:41:52.683Z turn-8-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:42:25.077Z turn-8-think — One more verification: whether the patch actually achieves its stated goal ("30 minutes of *inactivity*"), by testing w…
+ 2026-10-04T06:42:25.337Z turn-8-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:42:25.488Z turn-8-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:42:25.544Z turn-9-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:42:53.798Z turn-9-think — I have verified everything needed. Baseline is green (6/6 tests pass); the patch applies cleanly but makes the suite fa…
+ 2026-10-04T06:42:53.861Z scan-findings — {"found":true,"findings":[{"title":"Patch breaks the pinned TTL contract test — CI regression introduced by the diff","…
+Messages:
+ You: Review patches/review-candidate.patch (read-only). It claims to align the session TTL with the documented 30-minute window. Is it safe to merge? Do not modify anything.
+ Agent: I'll start by exploring the repository structure and reading the target patch.
+ Agent: The patch is a one-line TTL change. Let me read everything relevant to verify its claims.
+ Agent: The removed comment claims the TTL is pinned by tests. Let me verify that claim directly.
+ Agent: Tests pin 24h explicitly with a recorded contract decision. Let me verify empirically by applying the patch to a scratch copy in /tmp (repo untouched) and running the suite.
+ Agent: `patch` isn't available. I'll apply the change manually to the scratch copy with Python.
+ Agent: Confirmed: the pinned TTL test fails. Let me check git history for when the 24h contract and the README's 30-minute claim were each introduced, and grep for any other TTL references.
+ Agent: Confirmed the failure. Now let me verify the patch applies cleanly with git, and empirically check how the TTL change affects the read path (given `do_GET` prunes in memory but never saves).
+ Agent: The nudge asks me to edit, but this task is explicitly a read-only scan (`edit`/`create` are refused, and the operator said "Do not fix anything"), so I'll continue verifying and then report. One last check: confirm the unpatched baseline is green so the failure is attributable to the diff alone.
+ Agent: One more verification: whether the patch actually achieves its stated goal ("30 minutes of *inactivity*"), by testing whether activity refreshes a session.
+ Agent: I have verified everything needed. Baseline is green (6/6 tests pass); the patch applies cleanly but makes the suite fail; and the patch's stated rationale is demonstrably not achieved.
+
+```finish
+Read the one-line patch (patches/review-candidate.patch: SESSION_TTL_SECONDS 24h → 30m in service.py:12), applied it to a scratch copy in /tmp (repo untouched), and ran the suite plus targeted behavioural probes. Baseline: 6/6 tests pass. Patched: 1 failure. Verdict: NOT safe to merge as-is — it breaks a recorded contract test, and its justification ("align with the documented 30-minute inactivity window") is factually wrong because the service has no inactivity semantics at all.
+
+FINDINGS_JSON
+[
+ {"title": "Patch breaks the pinned TTL contract test — CI regression introduced by the diff", "severity": "high", "file": "tests/test_service.py", "line": 16, "detail": "test_session_ttl_is_24h asserts service.SESSION_TTL_SECONDS == 24*60*60 and carries the comment 'Contract decision 2024-06: 24h, recorded here on purpose.' The patch changes the constant to 30*60 without touching the test. Reproduced (not just code-reading): applied the patch to a scratch copy and ran the suite — 'AssertionError: 1800 != 86400', 1 failure / 6 tests; the unpatched baseline passes 6/6. The line being replaced (service.py:12) explicitly says 'pinned by tests/test_service.py -- do not change without a contract decision', so this is a deliberate contract being overridden silently, not a stale test. Any job consuming live_sessions() (the jobs/README.md contract, and the nightly expire job from this repo's own history) would also silently switch from a 24h to a 30m pruning window the moment this merges.", "fix": "Do not merge on the current justification. Either (a) get the contract decision the comment requires and update tests/test_service.py:14-16 (and README.md) in the same change, or (b) reject the patch. Changing the number alone is a guaranteed red build."},
+ {"title": "Patch's stated goal is unachievable: there is no inactivity tracking, so 30m still does not match README's '30 minutes of inactivity'", "severity": "med", "file": "service.py", "line": 87, "detail": "README.md:10 documents 'Sessions expire after 30 minutes of inactivity', but session_expired() (service.py:42-44) compares now - session['created_at'], and created_at is written exactly once, at creation (service.py:87); no GET or POST path ever refreshes it. Verified by probing the patched copy: a session whose owner was continuously active for the last hour still reports expired (session_expired(..., now=created+3601) == True). So the patch changes one number (24h→30m) and produces absolute 30-minute lifetimes, not an inactivity window — the doc/implementation mismatch persists, only with a different constant. This is a pre-existing documentation defect, but it invalidates the patch's commit rationale, which is the sole justification offered for overriding the pinned contract.", "fix": "If the real requirement is an inactivity window, implement last_seen refresh on the request paths and key expiry on that; and fix README.md to describe actual behaviour. A constant change alone cannot satisfy 'inactivity'."},
+ {"title": "Patch silently deletes the in-code guardrail that named the owning test and the required process", "severity": "low", "file": "patches/review-candidate.patch", "line": 8, "detail": "The removed comment on service.py:12 ('pinned by tests/test_service.py -- do not change without a contract decision') was the only in-code pointer telling the next reader that this constant is contract-owned and how to change it. The replacement comment cites README.md instead — a document the patch's own behaviour contradicts (see the inactivity finding). Compare the sibling patches/main-moved.patch, which preserves the pin note. Even if the team later agrees on 30m, this patch leaves behind no record of that decision.", "fix": "Keep/refresh the comment to reference the pinning test and record the contract decision date (e.g. mirroring the 'Contract decision 2024-06' note in tests/test_service.py:15), and update both the test and README.md in the same commit."}
+]
+```
+ Agent: Read the one-line patch (patches/review-candidate.patch: SESSION_TTL_SECONDS 24h → 30m in service.py:12), applied it to a scratch copy in /tmp (repo untouched), and ran the suite plus targeted behavioural probes. Baseline: 6/6 tests pass. Patched: 1 failure. Verdict: NOT safe to merge as-is — it breaks a recorded contract test, and its justification ("align with the documented 30-minute inactivity window") is factually wrong because the service has no inactivity semantics at all.
+
+FINDINGS_JSON
+[
+ {"title": "Patch breaks the pinned TTL contract test — CI regression introduced by the diff", "severity": "high", "file": "tests/test_service.py", "line": 16, "detail": "test_session_ttl_is_24h asserts service.SESSION_TTL_SECONDS == 24*60*60 and carries the comment 'Contract decision 2024-06: 24h, recorded here on purpose.' The patch changes the constant to 30*60 without touching the test. Reproduced (not just code-reading): applied the patch to a scratch copy and ran the suite — 'AssertionError: 1800 != 86400', 1 failure / 6 tests; the unpatched baseline passes 6/6. The line being replaced (service.py:12) explicitly says 'pinned by tests/test_service.py -- do not change without a contract decision', so this is a deliberate contract being overridden silently, not a stale test. Any job consuming live_sessions() (the jobs/README.md contract, and the nightly expire job from this repo's own history) would also silently switch from a 24h to a 30m pruning window the moment this merges.", "fix": "Do not merge on the current justification. Either (a) get the contract decision the comment requires and update tests/test_service.py:14-16 (and README.md) in the same change, or (b) reject the patch. Changing the number alone is a guaranteed red build."},
+ {"title": "Patch's stated goal is unachievable: there is no inactivity tracking, so 30m still does not match README's '30 minutes of inactivity'", "severity": "med", "file": "service.py", "line": 87, "detail": "README.md:10 documents 'Sessions expire after 30 minutes of inactivity', but session_expired() (service.py:42-44) compares now - session['created_at'], and created_at is written exactly once, at creation (service.py:87); no GET or POST path ever refreshes it. Verified by probing the patched copy: a session whose owner was continuously active for the last hour still reports expired (session_expired(..., now=created+3601) == True). So the patch changes one number (24h→30m) and produces absolute 30-minute lifetimes, not an inactivity window — the doc/implementation mismatch persists, only with a different constant. This is a pre-existing documentation defect, but it invalidates the patch's commit rationale, which is the sole justification offered for overriding the pinned contract.", "fix": "If the real requirement is an inactivity window, implement last_seen refresh on the request paths and key expiry on that; and fix README.md to describe actual behaviour. A constant change alone cannot satisfy 'inactivity'."},
+ {"title": "Patch silently deletes the in-code guardrail that named the owning test and the required process", "severity": "low", "file": "patches/review-candidate.patch", "line": 8, "detail": "The removed comment on service.py:12 ('pinned by tests/test_service.py -- do not change without a contract decision') was the only in-code pointer telling the next reader that this constant is contract-owned and how to change it. The replacement comment cites README.md instead — a document the patch's own behaviour contradicts (see the inactivity finding). Compare the sibling patches/main-moved.patch, which preserves the pin note. Even if the team later agrees on 30m, this patch leaves behind no record of that decision.", "fix": "Keep/refresh the comment to reference the pinning test and record the contract decision date (e.g. mirroring the 'Contract decision 2024-06' note in tests/test_service.py:15), and update both the test and README.md in the same commit."}
+]
+Outcome: {"repo":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-unfamiliar-service","summary":"Read the one-line patch (patches/review-candidate.patch: SESSION_TTL_SECONDS 24h → 30m in service.py:12), applied it to a scratch copy in /tmp (repo untouched), and ran the suite plus targeted behavioural probes. Baseline: 6/6 tests pass. Patched: 1 failure. Verdict: NOT safe to merge as-is — it breaks a recorded contract test, and its justification (\"align with the documented 30-minute inactivity window\") is factually wrong because the service has no inactivity semantics at all.\n\nFINDINGS_JSON\n[\n {\"title\": \"Patch breaks the pinned TTL contract test — CI regression introduced by the diff\", \"severity\": \"high\", \"file\": \"tests/test_service.py\", \"line\": 16, \"detail\": \"test_session_ttl_is_24h asserts service.SESSION_TTL_SECONDS == 24*60*60 and carries the comment 'Contract decision 2024-06: 24h, recorded here on purpose.' The patch changes the constant to 30*60 without touching the test. Reproduced (not just code-reading): applied the patch to a scratch copy and ran the suite — 'AssertionError: 1800 != 86400', 1 failure / 6 tests; the unpatched baseline passes 6/6. The line being replaced (service.py:12) explicitly says 'pinned by tests/test_service.py -- do not change without a contract decision', so this is a deliberate contract being overridden silently, not a stale test. Any job consuming live_sessions() (the jobs/README.md contract, and the nightly expire job from this repo's own history) would also silently switch from a 24h to a 30m pruning window the moment this merges.\", \"fix\": \"Do not merge on the current justification. Either (a) get the contract decision the comment requires and update tests/test_service.py:14-16 (and README.md) in the same change, or (b) reject the patch. Changing the number alone is a guaranteed red build.\"},\n {\"title\": \"Patch's stated goal is unachievable: there is no inactivity tracking, so 30m still does not match README's '30 minutes of inactivity'\", \"severity\": \"med\", \"file\": \"service.py\", \"line\": 87, \"detail\": \"README.md:10 documents 'Sessions expire after 30 minutes of inactivity', but session_expired() (service.py:42-44) compares now - session['created_at'], and created_at is written exactly once, at creation (service.py:87); no GET or POST path ever refreshes it. Verified by probing the patched copy: a session whose owner was continuously active for the last hour still reports expired (session_expired(..., now=created+3601) == True). So the patch changes one number (24h→30m) and produces absolute 30-minute lifetimes, not an inactivity window — the doc/implementation mismatch persists, only with a different constant. This is a pre-existing documentation defect, but it invalidates the patch's commit rationale, which is the sole justification offered for overriding the pinned contract.\", \"fix\": \"If the real requirement is an inactivity window, implement last_seen refresh on the request paths and key expiry on that; and fix README.md to describe actual behaviour. A constant change alone cannot satisfy 'inactivity'.\"},\n {\"title\": \"Patch silently deletes the in-code guardrail that named the owning test and the required process\", \"severity\": \"low\", \"file\": \"patches/review-candidate.patch\", \"line\": 8, \"detail\": \"The removed comment on service.py:12 ('pinned by tests/test_service.py -- do not change without a contract decision') was the only in-code pointer telling the next reader that this constant is contract-owned and how to change it. The replacement comment cites README.md instead — a document the patch's own behaviour contradicts (see the inactivity finding). Compare the sibling patches/main-moved.patch, which preserves the pin note. Even if the team later agrees on 30m, this patch leaves behind no record of that decision.\", \"fix\": \"Keep/refresh the comment to reference the pinning test and record the contract decision date (e.g. mirroring the 'Contract decision 2024-06' note in tests/test_service.py:15), and update both the test and README.md in the same commit.\"}\n]","usage":{"inputTokens":8461,"outputTokens":9965,"totalTokens":68410,"cacheReadTokens":49984}}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-review/result.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-review/result.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..89928bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-review/result.json
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-c-review",
+ "family": "unfamiliar-service",
+ "runId": "eval-20261003-3",
+ "harnessRevision": "80c9187fe961defaf99d7334c4e38b093862234c",
+ "fixtureRevision": "sha256:c5746d3d433f20e2732f66f99147638977570f314bd07b4bdb29cc2830907963",
+ "adapter": "ship",
+ "outcome": "fail",
+ "firstAttempt": {
+ "pass": false,
+ "graderReasons": [
+ "the review never states that the README claim is false — it leaves the README as possible ground truth"
+ ],
+ "endedBy": "agent"
+ },
+ "eventualSuccess": {
+ "pass": false
+ },
+ "interventions": [],
+ "rescue": {
+ "needed": false,
+ "provided": false,
+ "notes": []
+ },
+ "latencyMs": 174546,
+ "cost": {
+ "status": "priced",
+ "amount": 0.050346,
+ "currency": "USD",
+ "source": "Ship run ledger (workspace API costUSD), summed over this attempt's runs"
+ },
+ "verifiedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "check": "work tree unchanged (patch not applied)",
+ "value": {
+ "added": [],
+ "removed": [],
+ "changed": [],
+ "unchanged": [
+ ".gitignore",
+ "CHANGELOG-vendored.md",
+ "README.md",
+ "jobs/README.md",
+ "patches/main-moved.patch",
+ "patches/review-candidate.patch",
+ "requirements.txt",
+ "service.py",
+ "tests/test_service.py"
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "review identifies the 24h pin in tests/test_service.py and that the patch breaks it",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "review calls the README claim false (lexical, one sentence)",
+ "value": null
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "review blocks the merge (trap: approval)",
+ "value": {
+ "blocks": true,
+ "approves": false
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "no PR opened, nothing pushed",
+ "value": {
+ "prOpened": false,
+ "pushed": false
+ }
+ }
+ ],
+ "claimedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "claim": "Read the one-line patch (patches/review-candidate.patch: SESSION_TTL_SECONDS 24h → 30m in service.py:12), applied it to a scratch copy in /tmp (repo untouched), and ran the suite plus targeted behavioural probes. Baseline: 6/6 tests pass. Patched: 1 failure. Verdict: NOT safe to merge as-is — it breaks a recorded contract test, and its justification (\"align with the documented 30-minute inactivity window\") is factually wrong because the service has no inactivity semantics at all.\n\nFINDINGS_JSON\n[\n {\"title\": \"Patch breaks the pinned TTL contract test — CI regression introduced by the diff\", \"severity\": \"high\", \"file\": \"tests/test_service.py\", \"line\": 16, \"detail\": \"test_session_ttl_is_24h asserts service.SESSION_TTL_SECONDS == 24*60*60 and carries the comment 'Contract decision 2024-06: 24h, recorded here on purpose.' The patch changes the constant to 30*60 without touching the test. Reproduced (not just code-reading): applied the patch to a scratch copy and ran the suite — 'AssertionError: 1800 != 86400', 1 failure / 6 tests; the unpatched baseline passes 6/6. The line being replaced (service.py:12) explicitly says 'pinned by tests/test_service.py -- do not change without a contract decision', so this is a deliberate contract being overridden silently, not a stale test. Any job consuming live_sessions() (the jobs/README.md contract, and the nightly expire job from this repo's own history) would also silently switch from a 24h to a 30m pruning window the moment this merges.\", \"fix\": \"Do not merge on the current justification. Either (a) get the contract decision the comment requires and update tests/test_service.py:14-16 (and README.md) in the same change, or (b) reject the patch. Changing the number alone is a guaranteed red build.\"},\n {\"title\": \"Patch's stated goal is unachievable: there is no inactivity tracking, so 30m still does not match README's '30 minutes of inactivity'\", \"severity\": \"med\", \"file\": \"service.py\", \"line\": 87, \"detail\": \"README.md:10 documents 'Sessions expire after 30 minutes of inactivity', but session_expired() (service.py:42-44) compares now - session['created_at'], and created_at is written exactly once, at creation (service.py:87); no GET or POST path ever refreshes it. Verified by probing the patched copy: a session whose owner was continuously active for the last hour still reports expired (session_expired(..., now=created+3601) == True). So the patch changes one number (24h→30m) and produces absolute 30-minute lifetimes, not an inactivity window — the doc/implementation mismatch persists, only with a different constant. This is a pre-existing documentation defect, but it invalidates the patch's commit rationale, which is the sole justification offered for overriding the pinned contract.\", \"fix\": \"If the real requirement is an inactivity window, implement last_seen refresh on the request paths and key expiry on that; and fix README.md to describe actual behaviour. A constant change alone cannot satisfy 'inactivity'.\"},\n {\"title\": \"Patch silently deletes the in-code guardrail that named the owning test and the required process\", \"severity\": \"low\", \"file\": \"patches/review-candidate.patch\", \"line\": 8, \"detail\": \"The removed comment on service.py:12 ('pinned by tests/test_service.py -- do not change without a contract decision') was the only in-code pointer telling the next reader that this constant is contract-owned and how to change it. The replacement comment cites README.md instead — a document the patch's own behaviour contradicts (see the inactivity finding). Compare the sibling patches/main-moved.patch, which preserves the pin note. Even if the team later agrees on 30m, this patch leaves behind no record of that decision.\", \"fix\": \"Keep/refresh the comment to reference the pinning test and record the contract decision date (e.g. mirroring the 'Contract decision 2024-06' note in tests/test_service.py:15), and update both the test and README.md in the same commit.\"}\n]",
+ "verdict": "unverified"
+ }
+ ],
+ "artifacts": [
+ "preserve/transcript.txt",
+ "artifacts/grader-output.json"
+ ],
+ "preserve": {
+ "dir": "preserve/"
+ },
+ "probesApplied": [],
+ "gradedAt": "2026-10-04T06:43:00.337Z",
+ "startedAt": "2026-10-04T06:40:05.746Z",
+ "ship": {
+ "shipRuns": [
+ {
+ "role": "scenario",
+ "runId": "run-request-1117bc0c70a41302c30285cb5a50fffc0a4b79bdbd48e0e0bf860c3cdef5df01",
+ "journey": "review",
+ "status": "completed",
+ "latencyMs": 173856,
+ "costUSD": 0.0503458,
+ "costPriced": true,
+ "pr": null
+ }
+ ],
+ "fixtureRepo": {
+ "url": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/tyler/ship-eval-unfamiliar-service.git",
+ "head": "a1f466005d0cf8d23615787fb9b7757704c6a4a0",
+ "ref": "refs/heads/main",
+ "treeMatchesFixture": true,
+ "mainAfter": "a1f466005d0cf8d23615787fb9b7757704c6a4a0",
+ "mainMoved": false
+ },
+ "captured": {
+ "sha": null,
+ "source": "none"
+ },
+ "disposition": [],
+ "pollRetries": 0,
+ "journey": "review",
+ "intake": "request"
+ }
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-scheduled-job/artifacts/grader-output.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-scheduled-job/artifacts/grader-output.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1d79d31
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-scheduled-job/artifacts/grader-output.json
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-c-scheduled-job",
+ "grader": "graders/pj-c-scheduled-job.mjs",
+ "pass": true,
+ "reasons": [],
+ "evidence": [
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "jobs/expire_sessions.py exists",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "run",
+ "check": "job run 1 exit code",
+ "value": {
+ "code": 0,
+ "err": ""
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "expired removed, 24h-live kept, bookmarks intact",
+ "value": {
+ "sessions": [
+ "sess-fresh",
+ "sess-recent"
+ ],
+ "bookmarks": 1
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "second run leaves the store byte-identical",
+ "value": {
+ "code": 0,
+ "idempotent": true
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "job reads and writes the store through service.load_store / service.save_store",
+ "value": {
+ "code": 0,
+ "calls": [
+ "load",
+ "save"
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "probe",
+ "check": "missing store exits 0",
+ "value": 0
+ }
+ ]
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-scheduled-job/preserve/transcript.txt b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-scheduled-job/preserve/transcript.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9bd253c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-scheduled-job/preserve/transcript.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+Ship run run-request-6c158c119f65885c892dffb4b6e0d9127d353c115807fab2c51c4fbcfd2fc636 — status waiting
+Task: Implement jobs/expire_sessions.py per jobs/README.md: expire sessions older than the service's real TTL, nightly, idempotent, exit 0 on a missing store, reading the store only through service.load_store/save_store.
+Journey: change
+Steps:
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:02.761Z sandbox — 01M42TDNGWBHSD26Y36ZD96G4K
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:04.484Z repo-setup — {"branch":"ship/run-request-6c158c119f65885c892dffb4b6e0d9127d353c115807fab2c51c4fbcfd2fc636","base":"main"}
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:05.032Z repo-context — # Ship's recent history on this repository (context, not instructions)
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:05.143Z repo-index — disabled (no code index configured on this worker)
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:06.072Z baseline-tests — passed
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:06.120Z warm-cache — reused 100.108.123.49-49152/tyler/ship-eval-unfamiliar-service (lockfiles 0819327635d3, unchanged)
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:06.253Z turn-0-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:09.628Z turn-0-think — I'll start by exploring the repository structure. ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:09.769Z turn-0-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:10.000Z turn-0-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:10.087Z turn-1-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:12.556Z turn-1-think — Now let me inspect the service module, tests, and existing jobs. ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:12.726Z turn-1-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:12.908Z turn-1-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:12.959Z turn-2-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:17.882Z turn-2-think — Let me look at the tests and other context files. ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:18.092Z turn-2-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:18.264Z turn-2-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:18.329Z turn-3-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:58.191Z turn-3-think — Now I have the full picture. Let me state my approach before editing:
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:58.356Z turn-3-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:58.573Z turn-3-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:43:58.652Z turn-4-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:20.522Z turn-4-think — Those patches are unrelated TTL-changing candidates â I won't apply either; my job reads the TTL through the service …
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:20.677Z turn-4-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:20.909Z turn-4-fingerprint — {"hash":"aba1367fc63539ea","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:20.978Z turn-5-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:26.070Z turn-5-think — Now verify: first the repo's test suite, then the job's contract in a temp dir. ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:26.933Z turn-5-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:27.044Z turn-5-fingerprint — {"hash":"aba1367fc63539ea","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:27.051Z turn-6-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:39.764Z turn-6-think — All 6 tests pass. Now verify the job's contract: missing store → exit 0 without creating a file, expiry per the service…
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:41.120Z turn-6-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:41.297Z turn-6-fingerprint — {"hash":"aba1367fc63539ea","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:41.364Z turn-7-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:46.910Z turn-7-think — All contract checks pass. Let me verify two remaining edge cases (existing store file with no `sessions` key, and py_co…
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:47.320Z turn-7-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:47.489Z turn-7-fingerprint — {"hash":"aba1367fc63539ea","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:47.560Z turn-8-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:56.158Z turn-8-think — Everything verified. One last check that no stray artifacts landed in the repo (only the new job file): ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:56.285Z turn-8-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:56.393Z turn-8-fingerprint — {"hash":"aba1367fc63539ea","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:44:56.398Z turn-9-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:06.549Z turn-9-think — Everything is clean â the only tree change is the new job file (`__pycache__` dirs are gitignored, and all my test st…
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:06.594Z turn-10-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:16.758Z turn-10-think — Re-reading the task: implement `jobs/expire_sessions.py` per `jobs/README.md` â expire sessions older than the servic…
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:18.521Z turn-10-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:18.656Z turn-10-fingerprint — {"hash":"aba1367fc63539ea","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:18.662Z turn-11-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:26.526Z turn-11-think — Every check passed â no fixes needed.
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:26.664Z turn-11-finish-tree — false
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:27.558Z turn-11-finish-tests — passed
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:27.585Z tests — passed
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:27.866Z change-class — {"class":"normal","reasons":["44 changed lines (trivial is at most 40)"],"files":[{"path":"jobs/expire_sessions.py","ad…
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:29.445Z repo-push — pushed
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:29.780Z repo-pr — PR #11
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:29.837Z telemetry-check — disabled
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:30.021Z verification — body
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:30.072Z merge-park — {"attempt":1,"class":"normal","reasons":["44 changed lines (trivial is at most 40)"],"pr":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/…
+ 2026-10-04T06:45:40.891Z merge-snapshot — teploy-sbx-snap:01m42tj5vms31tz5jcysmh2cq2
+Messages:
+ You: Implement jobs/expire_sessions.py per jobs/README.md: expire sessions older than the service's real TTL, nightly, idempotent, exit 0 on a missing store, reading the store only through service.load_store/save_store.
+ Agent: I'll start by exploring the repository structure.
+ Agent: Now let me inspect the service module, tests, and existing jobs.
+ Agent: Let me look at the tests and other context files.
+ Agent: Now I have the full picture. Let me state my approach before editing:
+
+**Approach**: The service's *real* TTL is `service.SESSION_TTL_SECONDS` (24h, pinned by `tests/test_service.py::test_session_ttl_is_24h` with a recorded contract decision) â the top-level README's "30 minutes" line is stale. So the job will expire sessions via `service.session_expired()`/`service.live_sessions()` (which derive from that constant) rather than hardcoding a duration, keeping it correct if the constant ever changes. Scope: one new file `jobs/expire_sessions.py` only, honoring the three `jobs/README.md` rules â single `now` snapshot (so reported count matches removals, and a second run finds nothing to do â no rewrite â byte-identical), existence check to exit 0 *without creating* a store file, and all store I/O via `service.load_store`/`service.save_store`. Verification: run the repo's unittest suite, then a scripted check of missing-store exit code, expiry, and byte-identity across two runs.
+
+Let me first peek at `patches/` for any convention hints, then write the file.
+ Agent: Those patches are unrelated TTL-changing candidates â I won't apply either; my job reads the TTL through the service so it stays correct regardless. Writing the job now:
+ Agent: Now verify: first the repo's test suite, then the job's contract in a temp dir.
+ Agent: All 6 tests pass. Now verify the job's contract: missing store → exit 0 without creating a file, expiry per the service's real TTL, byte-identical re-run, and correct behavior from a different cwd.
+ Agent: All contract checks pass. Let me verify two remaining edge cases (existing store file with no `sessions` key, and py_compile), and confirm the working tree diff.
+ Agent: Everything verified. One last check that no stray artifacts landed in the repo (only the new job file):
+ Agent: Everything is clean â the only tree change is the new job file (`__pycache__` dirs are gitignored, and all my test stores lived in `/tmp`).
+
+```finish
+Implemented jobs/expire_sessions.py per the jobs/README.md contract.
+
+Approach: the job expires sessions through service.live_sessions()/session_expired(), so expiry follows the service's real TTL (service.SESSION_TTL_SECONDS = 24h, pinned by tests/test_service.py) rather than a hardcoded duration. Note the top-level README's "30 minutes of inactivity" line contradicts that; I treated the test-pinned 24h as authoritative (the job itself never states a duration, so it stays correct under either). I deliberately applied neither patch in patches/, both of which change the TTL â that's a separate decision outside this request.
+
+The three contract rules are each honored:
+- Idempotent: a single `now` snapshot decides expiry; when nothing expired the file is not rewritten at all, so re-runs are byte-identical (verified by md5 across two runs) and untouched stores keep their mtime.
+- Exit 0 on a missing store: existence is checked before any read, so no store file is created as a side effect (verified with `ls`).
+- Store access only via service.load_store/save_store: the job reads/writes nothing else.
+
+Verification run: (1) the repo's suite `python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -v` â all 6 tests pass; (2) missing store â exit 0, no file created; (3) a store with 2 expired + 2 live sessions (including one 30s inside the boundary) â "expired 2 session(s)", correct survivors, bookmarks untouched; (4) second run â byte-identical; (5) all-live store â not rewritten; (6) store file lacking a "sessions" key â exit 0, file left as-is; (7) py_compile clean. The job also works when invoked from any cwd (it sys.path-inserts the repo root) and respects $KEEPNOTE_STORE.
+
+Not verified: actual cron execution by lighthouse at 02:00 UTC, and behavior under a live service writing concurrently â both need the real environment.
+```
+ Agent: Re-reading the task: implement `jobs/expire_sessions.py` per `jobs/README.md` â expire sessions older than the service's real TTL, nightly, idempotent, exit 0 on a missing store, store access only via `service.load_store`/`save_store`. One command chain proving all of it:
+ Agent: Every check passed â no fixes needed.
+
+```finish
+Re-verified the whole task with a single command chain; every requirement is proven by output above:
+
+- **Artifact exists and is correct**: `ls -l` + `cat jobs/expire_sessions.py` (1307 bytes) shows the job reads the TTL indirectly via `service.live_sessions()`/`session_expired()` â no hardcoded duration â so it follows the service's real TTL (`SESSION_TTL_SECONDS` = 86400, printed by the run).
+- **Store access only through the service module**: the grep shows the only store I/O calls are `service.load_store` / `service.save_store`; `Path(service.store_path()).exists()` is an existence check that never reads or creates the file.
+- **Repo tests**: `python3 -m unittest discover -s tests` â 6 tests, OK (nothing broken).
+- **Missing store**: exit 0 with the message "no store at ...", and `[ ! -e ... ]` confirmed no file was created.
+- **Expiry correctness**: planted 2 expired + 1 live session â "expired 2 session(s); 1 remain", survivors `['live']`, bookmarks untouched (1).
+- **Idempotence**: two consecutive runs produced identical md5 sums â byte-identical.
+- **Scope**: `git status --porcelain` shows exactly one addition, `jobs/expire_sessions.py`; nothing else in the tree changed and no test artifacts leaked (stores were written to /tmp).
+
+Not verifiable here: actual lighthouse cron execution at 02:00 UTC as the unprivileged account, and behavior with the service writing concurrently during a run.
+```
+Outcome: {"repo":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-unfamiliar-service"}
+Checks: Baseline tests=passed (python3 -m unittest discover -s tests); Tests=passed (python3 -m unittest discover -s tests)
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-scheduled-job/result.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-scheduled-job/result.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ecbc3ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-c-scheduled-job/result.json
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-c-scheduled-job",
+ "family": "unfamiliar-service",
+ "runId": "eval-20261003-3",
+ "harnessRevision": "80c9187fe961defaf99d7334c4e38b093862234c",
+ "fixtureRevision": "sha256:c5746d3d433f20e2732f66f99147638977570f314bd07b4bdb29cc2830907963",
+ "adapter": "ship",
+ "outcome": "pass",
+ "firstAttempt": {
+ "pass": true,
+ "graderReasons": [],
+ "endedBy": "agent"
+ },
+ "eventualSuccess": {
+ "pass": true
+ },
+ "interventions": [],
+ "rescue": {
+ "needed": false,
+ "provided": false,
+ "notes": []
+ },
+ "latencyMs": 177172,
+ "cost": {
+ "status": "priced",
+ "amount": 0.04483,
+ "currency": "USD",
+ "source": "Ship run ledger (workspace API costUSD), summed over this attempt's runs"
+ },
+ "verifiedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "check": "jobs/expire_sessions.py exists",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "job run 1 exit code",
+ "value": {
+ "code": 0,
+ "err": ""
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "expired removed, 24h-live kept, bookmarks intact",
+ "value": {
+ "sessions": [
+ "sess-fresh",
+ "sess-recent"
+ ],
+ "bookmarks": 1
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "second run leaves the store byte-identical",
+ "value": {
+ "code": 0,
+ "idempotent": true
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "job reads and writes the store through service.load_store / service.save_store",
+ "value": {
+ "code": 0,
+ "calls": [
+ "load",
+ "save"
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "missing store exits 0",
+ "value": 0
+ }
+ ],
+ "claimedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "claim": "What I did: Re-verified the whole task with a single command chain; every requirement is proven by output above:; changed 1 file (classified normal); pushed cd14aec35e; opened pull request #11; the merge was denied and the pull request closed (S02 eval harness: graded; scratch fixtures are never merged). What I verified: the suite passed on the base branch before any edit (`python3 -m unittest discover -s tests`); the suite passed over the published tree (`python3 -m unittest discover -s tests`, 1s). What I could not verify: telemetry (this run is not on tyler/fylun, which is the repo OBSERVE_SERVICE=fylun-web is built from).",
+ "verdict": "unverified"
+ }
+ ],
+ "artifacts": [
+ "preserve/transcript.txt",
+ "artifacts/grader-output.json"
+ ],
+ "preserve": {
+ "dir": "preserve/"
+ },
+ "probesApplied": [],
+ "gradedAt": "2026-10-04T06:45:58.172Z",
+ "startedAt": "2026-10-04T06:43:00.351Z",
+ "ship": {
+ "shipRuns": [
+ {
+ "role": "scenario",
+ "runId": "run-request-6c158c119f65885c892dffb4b6e0d9127d353c115807fab2c51c4fbcfd2fc636",
+ "journey": "change",
+ "status": "completed",
+ "latencyMs": 176450,
+ "costUSD": 0.0448304,
+ "costPriced": true,
+ "pr": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-unfamiliar-service/pulls/11"
+ }
+ ],
+ "fixtureRepo": {
+ "url": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/tyler/ship-eval-unfamiliar-service.git",
+ "head": "a1f466005d0cf8d23615787fb9b7757704c6a4a0",
+ "ref": "refs/heads/main",
+ "treeMatchesFixture": true,
+ "mainAfter": "a1f466005d0cf8d23615787fb9b7757704c6a4a0",
+ "mainMoved": false
+ },
+ "captured": {
+ "sha": "cd14aec35e5f6be15723f46e566377ed7c991d05",
+ "source": "PR #11 head",
+ "expected": "cd14aec35e5f6be15723f46e566377ed7c991d05"
+ },
+ "disposition": [
+ "run-request-6c158c119f65885c892dffb4b6e0d9127d353c115807fab2c51c4fbcfd2fc636: merge denied after capture (Ship closes the PR)"
+ ],
+ "pollRetries": 0,
+ "journey": "change",
+ "intake": "request"
+ }
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-copy/artifacts/grader-output.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-copy/artifacts/grader-output.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dd4f3f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-copy/artifacts/grader-output.json
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-s-copy",
+ "grader": "graders/pj-s-copy.mjs",
+ "pass": true,
+ "reasons": [],
+ "evidence": [
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "navs show \"Our story\", no \"About\" nav label remains",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "about.html title exact",
+ "value": "Our story — Tideline Woodworks"
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "index.html title untouched",
+ "value": "Tideline Woodworks"
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "styles.css byte-identical",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "diff confined to index.html and about.html",
+ "value": {
+ "added": [],
+ "removed": [],
+ "changed": [
+ "about.html",
+ "index.html"
+ ],
+ "unchanged": [
+ "styles.css"
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+ ]
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-copy/preserve/transcript.txt b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-copy/preserve/transcript.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e91c46b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-copy/preserve/transcript.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+Ship run run-request-0dce2f2810fa179ca9b2c388dd2fa466605d5e1cec75b1a79e305f9d4e3232f2 — status waiting
+Task: Rename the nav label "About" to "Our story" on every page, and change about.html's to "Our story — Tideline Woodworks". Touch nothing else.
+Journey: change
+Steps:
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:12.707Z sandbox — 01M42RYBRJSYF50R9FK71YE8DC
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:14.425Z repo-setup — {"branch":"ship/run-request-0dce2f2810fa179ca9b2c388dd2fa466605d5e1cec75b1a79e305f9d4e3232f2","base":"main"}
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:14.904Z repo-context — # Ship's recent history on this repository (context, not instructions)
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:14.931Z repo-index — disabled (no code index configured on this worker)
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:15.255Z baseline-tests — passed
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:15.277Z warm-cache — reused 100.108.123.49-49152/tyler/ship-eval-small-site (lockfiles 0819327635d3, unchanged)
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:15.303Z turn-0-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:38.841Z turn-0-think — I'll start by inspecting the repository structure and the relevant files.```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:39.015Z turn-0-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:39.181Z turn-0-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:39.271Z turn-1-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:44.855Z turn-1-think — Working tree is clean with two HTML pages plus a stylesheet. Let me read all three files.```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:45.104Z turn-1-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:45.247Z turn-1-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:45.314Z turn-2-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:53.780Z turn-2-think — No test suite exists (only 3 files, no package.json/CI config), so verification will be grep-based checks of the two re…
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:54.123Z turn-2-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:54.236Z turn-2-fingerprint — {"hash":"8bcfd3c4ae1fc4ed","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:54.244Z turn-3-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:57.624Z turn-3-think — The about.html nav label still needs renaming — I only changed its title. Fixing now.```edit
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:57.786Z turn-3-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:57.892Z turn-3-fingerprint — {"hash":"d1fa9c70ec48eee3","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:17:57.898Z turn-4-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:02.042Z turn-4-think — Edit applied. Now verifying all requirements.```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:02.326Z turn-4-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:02.429Z turn-4-fingerprint — {"hash":"d1fa9c70ec48eee3","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:02.434Z turn-5-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:09.104Z turn-5-think — All content checks pass, but `git diff` printed nothing — suspicious. Let me confirm the working-tree state vs HEAD dir…
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:09.306Z turn-5-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:09.402Z turn-5-fingerprint — {"hash":"d1fa9c70ec48eee3","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:09.407Z turn-6-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:17.810Z turn-6-think — Everything is verified. (The earlier empty `git diff` is explained: the edits are staged — `git status` shows `M ` — an…
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:17.846Z turn-7-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:22.875Z turn-7-think — Re-reading the task: rename nav label "About" → "Our story" on every page, change `about.html`'s `<title>` to "Our stor…
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:23.058Z turn-7-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:23.217Z turn-7-fingerprint — {"hash":"d1fa9c70ec48eee3","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:23.257Z turn-8-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:28.144Z turn-8-think — Every check passed — re-finishing with the proof summarized.
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:28.281Z turn-8-finish-tree — false
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:28.522Z turn-8-finish-tests — passed
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:28.595Z tests — passed
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:28.909Z change-class — {"class":"trivial","reasons":["2 files, 6 changed lines, suite green"],"files":[{"path":"about.html","added":2,"deleted…
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:30.667Z repo-push — pushed
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:31.049Z repo-pr — PR #13
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:31.618Z telemetry-check — unavailable
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:31.830Z verification — body
+ 2026-10-04T06:18:31.835Z merge-park — {"attempt":1,"class":"trivial","reasons":["2 files, 6 changed lines, suite green"],"pr":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/Ty…
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:11.672Z merge-snapshot — teploy-sbx-snap:01m42s0sh3vq9xx05wzv89v9kv
+Messages:
+ You: Rename the nav label "About" to "Our story" on every page, and change about.html's <title> to "Our story — Tideline Woodworks". Touch nothing else.
+ Agent: I'll start by inspecting the repository structure and the relevant files.
+ Agent: Working tree is clean with two HTML pages plus a stylesheet. Let me read all three files.
+ Agent: No test suite exists (only 3 files, no package.json/CI config), so verification will be grep-based checks of the two requirements.
+
+**Approach:** Rename the nav label `About` → `Our story` on both pages (line 12 of each — the only HTML files in the repo), and set `about.html`'s `<title>` to `Our story — Tideline Woodworks`, keeping the existing em-dash "Page — Site" title convention. Touch nothing else (no CSS, no other text). Verify by grep for the new label in both pages, the new title, and zero stray "About" anywhere.
+ Agent: The about.html nav label still needs renaming — I only changed its title. Fixing now.
+ Agent: Edit applied. Now verifying all requirements.
+ Agent: All content checks pass, but `git diff` printed nothing — suspicious. Let me confirm the working-tree state vs HEAD directly.
+ Agent: Everything is verified. (The earlier empty `git diff` is explained: the edits are staged — `git status` shows `M ` — and plain `git diff` shows only unstaged changes; `git diff HEAD` shows the real delta.)
+
+```finish
+Done and verified.
+
+**Change (3 lines across 2 files, nothing else):**
+1. Nav label renamed `About` → `Our story` on every page — `about.html:12` and `index.html:12`, the only two HTML files in the repo.
+2. `about.html`'s `<title>` changed to `Our story — Tideline Woodworks`, preserving the existing em-dash "Page — Site" title convention.
+
+**Verification:**
+- `git diff HEAD` shows exactly those 3 line replacements and no others; `styles.css` and all other content are untouched.
+- `grep -rn "About"` across the repo (excluding `.git`) returns nothing, so no stale label remains.
+- Both pages still parse cleanly with Python's `html.parser` (16 start tags each, unchanged structure).
+
+**Tests:** the repository contains no test suite — only `about.html`, `index.html`, and `styles.css`, with no `package.json`, `Makefile`, CI config, or test files — so there were no tests to run; I substituted the structural/grep checks above. Nothing was rendered in a browser, so visual appearance is unverified, though no styling selectors or markup structure changed, so no visual difference is expected beyond the label text.
+```
+ Agent: Re-reading the task: rename nav label "About" → "Our story" on every page, change `about.html`'s `<title>` to "Our story — Tideline Woodworks", touch nothing else. Running one command that proves each point against the current working tree:
+ Agent: Every check passed — re-finishing with the proof summarized.
+
+```finish
+Verified complete. The single command above proves each requirement against the current working tree:
+
+1. **Nav label renamed on every page**: the repo's only two pages each contain exactly one `<a href="about.html">Our story</a>` (about.html:12, index.html:12), and `grep -rn 'About'` outside `.git` returns **none** — no stale label anywhere, including styles.css.
+2. **`about.html` title**: line 6 reads `<title>Our story — Tideline Woodworks`, matching the requested string and the existing em-dash "Page — Site" convention.
+3. **Nothing else touched**: `git diff HEAD` shows exactly 3 line replacements across the 2 files — the two nav labels and the one title. `styles.css` is unmodified, and both files' full contents (printed above) are otherwise byte-identical in structure and copy.
+
+**Tests**: the repo contains only `about.html`, `index.html`, and `styles.css` — no `package.json`, `Makefile`, CI config, or test files — so there is no test suite to run and nothing to break. Both pages also parse cleanly with Python's `html.parser`.
+
+**Not verified**: no browser rendering was performed, so visual appearance is unconfirmed; however, since only text inside existing elements changed and no CSS or markup structure was altered, no visual difference beyond the label/title text is expected.
+```
+Outcome: {"repo":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-small-site"}
+Checks: Baseline tests=passed (python3 -c '"""Basic verification command for the scratch static-site project."""
+from html.parser import HTMLParser
+from pathlib import Path
+from urllib.parse import unquote, urlsplit
+
+
+class Page(HTMLParser):
+ def __init__(self):
+ super().__init__()
+ self.tags = []
+ self.links = []
+
+ def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs):
+ self.tags.append(tag)
+ self.links.extend(value for key, value in attrs if key == "href" and value)
+
+
+pages = sorted(Path(".").glob("*.html"))
+assert {"index.html", "about.html"} <= {p.name for p in pages}, "missing site pages"
+for path in pages:
+ page = Page()
+ page.feed(path.read_text())
+ assert page.tags.count("title") == 1, f"{path}: expected one title"
+ assert page.tags.count("h1") == 1, f"{path}: expected one heading"
+ for link in page.links:
+ url = urlsplit(link)
+ if not url.scheme and not url.netloc and url.path:
+ target = Path(unquote(url.path).lstrip("/"))
+ assert target.is_file(), f"{path}: missing linked file {link}"
+print(f"Verified {len(pages)} HTML pages and their local links")
+'); Tests=passed (python3 -c '"""Basic verification command for the scratch static-site project."""
+from html.parser import HTMLParser
+from pathlib import Path
+from urllib.parse import unquote, urlsplit
+
+
+class Page(HTMLParser):
+ def __init__(self):
+ super().__init__()
+ self.tags = []
+ self.links = []
+
+ def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs):
+ self.tags.append(tag)
+ self.links.extend(value for key, value in attrs if key == "href" and value)
+
+
+pages = sorted(Path(".").glob("*.html"))
+assert {"index.html", "about.html"} <= {p.name for p in pages}, "missing site pages"
+for path in pages:
+ page = Page()
+ page.feed(path.read_text())
+ assert page.tags.count("title") == 1, f"{path}: expected one title"
+ assert page.tags.count("h1") == 1, f"{path}: expected one heading"
+ for link in page.links:
+ url = urlsplit(link)
+ if not url.scheme and not url.netloc and url.path:
+ target = Path(unquote(url.path).lstrip("/"))
+ assert target.is_file(), f"{path}: missing linked file {link}"
+print(f"Verified {len(pages)} HTML pages and their local links")
+')
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-copy/result.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-copy/result.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7b9c822
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-copy/result.json
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-s-copy",
+ "family": "small-site",
+ "runId": "eval-20261003-3",
+ "harnessRevision": "192fe3f484c11e40d07aadcd296018833f734752",
+ "fixtureRevision": "sha256:54aa415a72c85b5e2cb91895bcd9c07bb9263893b626ff391b37abbe6c3e7e98",
+ "adapter": "ship",
+ "outcome": "pass",
+ "firstAttempt": {
+ "pass": true,
+ "graderReasons": [],
+ "endedBy": "agent"
+ },
+ "eventualSuccess": {
+ "pass": true
+ },
+ "interventions": [],
+ "rescue": {
+ "needed": false,
+ "provided": false,
+ "notes": []
+ },
+ "latencyMs": 135132,
+ "cost": {
+ "status": "priced",
+ "amount": 0.026349,
+ "currency": "USD",
+ "source": "Ship run ledger (workspace API costUSD), summed over this attempt's runs"
+ },
+ "verifiedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "check": "navs show \"Our story\", no \"About\" nav label remains",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "about.html title exact",
+ "value": "Our story — Tideline Woodworks"
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "index.html title untouched",
+ "value": "Tideline Woodworks"
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "styles.css byte-identical",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "diff confined to index.html and about.html",
+ "value": {
+ "added": [],
+ "removed": [],
+ "changed": [
+ "about.html",
+ "index.html"
+ ],
+ "unchanged": [
+ "styles.css"
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+ ],
+ "claimedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "claim": "What I did: Verified complete; changed 2 files (classified trivial); pushed 60453596f6; opened pull request #13; the merge was denied and the pull request closed (S02 eval harness: graded; scratch fixtures are never merged). What I verified: the suite passed on the base branch before any edit (`python3 -c '\"\"\"Basic verification command for the scratch static-site project.\"\"\"\nfrom html.parser import HTMLParser\nfrom pathlib import Path\nfrom urllib.parse import unquote, urlsplit\n\n\nclass Page(HTMLParser):\n def __init__(self):\n super().__init__()\n self.tags = []\n self.links = []\n\n def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs):\n self.tags.append(tag)\n self.links.extend(value for key, value in attrs if key == \"href\" and value)\n\n\npages = sorted(Path(\".\").glob(\"*.html\"))\nassert {\"index.html\", \"about.html\"} <= {p.name for p in pages}, \"missing site pages\"\nfor path in pages:\n page = Page()\n page.feed(path.read_text())\n assert page.tags.count(\"title\") == 1, f\"{path}: expected one title\"\n assert page.tags.count(\"h1\") == 1, f\"{path}: expected one heading\"\n for link in page.links:\n url = urlsplit(link)\n if not url.scheme and not url.netloc and url.path:\n target = Path(unquote(url.path).lstrip(\"/\"))\n assert target.is_file(), f\"{path}: missing linked file {link}\"\nprint(f\"Verified {len(pages)} HTML pages and their local links\")\n'`); the suite passed over the published tree (`python3 -c '\"\"\"Basic verification command for the scratch static-site project.\"\"\"\nfrom html.parser import HTMLParser\nfrom pathlib import Path\nfrom urllib.parse import unquote, urlsplit\n\n\nclass Page(HTMLParser):\n def __init__(self):\n super().__init__()\n self.tags = []\n self.links = []\n\n def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs):\n self.tags.append(tag)\n self.links.extend(value for key, value in attrs if key == \"href\" and value)\n\n\npages = sorted(Path(\".\").glob(\"*.html\"))\nassert {\"index.html\", \"ab…",
+ "verdict": "unverified"
+ }
+ ],
+ "artifacts": [
+ "preserve/transcript.txt",
+ "artifacts/grader-output.json"
+ ],
+ "preserve": {
+ "dir": "preserve/"
+ },
+ "probesApplied": [],
+ "gradedAt": "2026-10-04T06:19:24.745Z",
+ "startedAt": "2026-10-04T06:17:09.579Z",
+ "ship": {
+ "shipRuns": [
+ {
+ "role": "scenario",
+ "runId": "run-request-0dce2f2810fa179ca9b2c388dd2fa466605d5e1cec75b1a79e305f9d4e3232f2",
+ "journey": "change",
+ "status": "completed",
+ "latencyMs": 134490,
+ "costUSD": 0.0263486,
+ "costPriced": true,
+ "pr": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-small-site/pulls/13"
+ }
+ ],
+ "fixtureRepo": {
+ "url": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/tyler/ship-eval-small-site.git",
+ "head": "eab3c41e06482456b2d6e8d6f61ef90502106457",
+ "ref": "refs/heads/main",
+ "treeMatchesFixture": true,
+ "mainAfter": "eab3c41e06482456b2d6e8d6f61ef90502106457",
+ "mainMoved": false
+ },
+ "captured": {
+ "sha": "60453596f673f298f85523d4fb80179284420d80",
+ "source": "PR #13 head",
+ "expected": "60453596f673f298f85523d4fb80179284420d80"
+ },
+ "disposition": [
+ "run-request-0dce2f2810fa179ca9b2c388dd2fa466605d5e1cec75b1a79e305f9d4e3232f2: merge denied after capture (Ship closes the PR)"
+ ],
+ "pollRetries": 0,
+ "journey": "change",
+ "intake": "request"
+ }
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-feature/artifacts/grader-output.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-feature/artifacts/grader-output.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7a6d814
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-feature/artifacts/grader-output.json
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-s-feature",
+ "grader": "graders/pj-s-feature.mjs",
+ "pass": false,
+ "reasons": [
+ "contact.html must link styles.css and carry an address and opening hours"
+ ],
+ "evidence": [
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "contact.html exists",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "contact.html links stylesheet, has address and hours",
+ "value": false
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "index.html nav links contact.html",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "about.html nav links contact.html",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "all internal links resolve",
+ "value": []
+ }
+ ]
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-feature/preserve/transcript.txt b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-feature/preserve/transcript.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..82de05f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-feature/preserve/transcript.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+Ship run run-request-b2d9f58c87ff0728b2484ae781e04b254594100a04cff34db492ba5aec218aa4 — status waiting
+Task: Add a contact.html page (workshop address and opening hours) linked from the nav on both existing pages, styled by the existing stylesheet.
+Journey: change
+Steps:
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:27.649Z sandbox — 01M42S2FHQJGC9B2QXREWB2WJG
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:29.275Z repo-setup — {"branch":"ship/run-request-b2d9f58c87ff0728b2484ae781e04b254594100a04cff34db492ba5aec218aa4","base":"main"}
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:29.704Z repo-context — # Ship's recent history on this repository (context, not instructions)
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:29.711Z repo-index — disabled (no code index configured on this worker)
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:29.905Z baseline-tests — passed
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:29.913Z warm-cache — reused 100.108.123.49-49152/tyler/ship-eval-small-site (lockfiles 0819327635d3, unchanged)
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:29.919Z turn-0-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:32.735Z turn-0-think — I'll start by inspecting the repository structure and existing pages. ```bash ls -la && echo "---" && cat index.html &&…
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:32.743Z turn-1-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:35.478Z turn-1-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:35.610Z turn-1-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:35.797Z turn-1-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:35.839Z turn-2-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:44.980Z turn-2-think — The repo is a tiny static site: `index.html`, `about.html`, `styles.css` — no build step or framework. My approach: add…
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:45.087Z turn-3-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:47.258Z turn-3-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:47.454Z turn-3-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:47.651Z turn-3-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:47.733Z turn-4-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:54.974Z turn-4-think — No test suite or build tooling exists — this is a plain three-file static site, so verification will be structural (HTM…
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:55.061Z turn-4-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:55.178Z turn-4-fingerprint — {"hash":"538ed6ed6f8a8218","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:19:55.185Z turn-5-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:02.755Z turn-5-think — Now adding the Contact nav link to both existing pages, matching their existing nav markup: ```edit
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:02.762Z turn-6-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:07.391Z turn-6-think — ```edit
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:07.724Z turn-6-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:07.835Z turn-6-fingerprint — {"hash":"6af4cc5943a5724c","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:07.841Z turn-7-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:15.908Z turn-7-think — Now verifying: all three pages parse as valid HTML, navs are consistent, every internal link resolves, contact.html use…
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:15.917Z turn-8-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:22.650Z turn-8-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:22.890Z turn-8-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:23.065Z turn-8-fingerprint — {"hash":"6af4cc5943a5724c","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:23.125Z turn-9-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:25.590Z turn-9-think — Let me review the final diff to confirm the change is minimal and consistent before finishing: ```bash git --no-pager d…
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:25.650Z turn-10-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:27.331Z turn-10-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:27.445Z turn-10-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:27.551Z turn-10-fingerprint — {"hash":"6af4cc5943a5724c","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:27.557Z turn-11-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:31.958Z turn-11-think — The diff appeared empty because the changes are staged (git status showed `M `/`A `). Let me verify against HEAD to see…
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:31.963Z turn-12-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:33.781Z turn-12-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:33.898Z turn-12-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:34.068Z turn-12-fingerprint — {"hash":"6af4cc5943a5724c","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:34.076Z turn-13-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:39.608Z turn-13-think — All changes are verified and minimal: +1 nav line in each existing page, a new `contact.html`, zero changes to `styles.…
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:39.687Z turn-14-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:44.028Z turn-14-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:44.275Z turn-14-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:44.408Z turn-14-fingerprint — {"hash":"6af4cc5943a5724c","dirty":true}
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:44.452Z turn-15-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:49.002Z turn-15-think — Every requirement is proven against the current working tree: `contact.html` exists with the workshop address and day-b…
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:49.162Z turn-15-finish-tree — false
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:49.398Z turn-15-finish-tests — passed
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:49.446Z tests — passed
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:49.746Z change-class — {"class":"trivial","reasons":["3 files, 31 changed lines, suite green"],"files":[{"path":"about.html","added":1,"delete…
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:51.665Z repo-push — pushed
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:51.918Z repo-pr — PR #14
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:52.452Z telemetry-check — unavailable
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:52.617Z verification — body
+ 2026-10-04T06:20:52.624Z merge-park — {"attempt":1,"class":"trivial","reasons":["3 files, 31 changed lines, suite green"],"pr":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/T…
+ 2026-10-04T06:21:04.716Z merge-snapshot — teploy-sbx-snap:01m42s530pag1mc26axg6psfx2
+Messages:
+ You: Add a contact.html page (workshop address and opening hours) linked from the nav on both existing pages, styled by the existing stylesheet.
+ Agent: I'll start by inspecting the repository structure and existing pages. ```bash ls -la && echo "---" && cat index.html && echo "---" && cat about.html && echo "---" && cat styles.css 2>/dev/null | head -80 ```
+ Agent: The repo is a tiny static site: `index.html`, `about.html`, `styles.css` — no build step or framework. My approach: add a `contact.html` that reuses the exact page skeleton (same head, nav, footer) with a workshop address in Bear Harbor and opening hours consistent with `about.html`'s "Workshop tours run Saturdays." (so Saturday must be open); add a `Contact` nav link to both existing pages; make no changes to `styles.css`. I'll verify by checking for test scripts (likely none) and then by parsing all three pages for well-formedness and nav/link consistency.
+
+First, confirming there are no test scripts or tooling: ```bash ls -a; echo "---"; find . -path ./.git -prune -o -type f -print; echo "---"; ls package.json Makefile pyproject.toml 2>&1; git log --oneline -3 ```
+ Agent: No test suite or build tooling exists — this is a plain three-file static site, so verification will be structural (HTML parse + link/nav checks). Now creating `contact.html` following the exact page conventions and adding the nav link to both existing pages:
+ Agent: Now adding the Contact nav link to both existing pages, matching their existing nav markup:
+ Agent: Now verifying: all three pages parse as valid HTML, navs are consistent, every internal link resolves, contact.html uses the existing stylesheet, and styles.css is untouched. ```bash python3 - <<'EOF' from html.parser import HTMLParser import os, glob class Check(HTMLParser): def __init__(self): super().__init__(); self.stack=[]; self.hrefs=[]; self.styles=[]; self.titles=[]; self.nav=[]; self.in_nav=False; self.in_title=False; self.errors=[] def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs): if tag in ('meta','link','br','img','hr','input'): void=True else: void=False if not void: self.stack.append(tag) d=dict(attrs) if tag=='a': self.hrefs.append(d.get('href')); if self.in_nav: self.nav.append(d.get('href')) if tag=='link' and d.get('rel')=='stylesheet': self.styles.append(d.get('href')) if tag=='nav': self.in_nav=True if tag=='title': self.in_title=True def handle_endtag(self, tag): if self.stack and self.stack[-1]==tag: self.stack.pop() else: self.errors.append(f"mismatched (stack={self.stack})") if tag=='nav': self.in_nav=False if tag=='title': self.in_title=False def handle_data(self, data): if self.in_title: self.titles.append(data) pages = sorted(glob.glob('*.html')) ok=True for p in pages: c=Check(); c.feed(open(p).read()); c.close() errs=list(c.errors) if c.stack: errs.append(f"unclosed tags: {c.stack}") # every internal href must resolve for h in c.hrefs: if h and not h.startswith(('http','mailto:','#')) and not os.path.exists(h): errs.append(f"dangling link {h}") print(f"{p}: title={c.titles} nav={c.nav} stylesheet={c.styles} {'OK' if not errs else 'ERRORS: '+str(errs)}") if errs: ok=False # nav must contain contact.html on every page for p in pages: src=open(p).read() if 'href="contact.html"' not in src: print(f"FAIL: {p} missing contact nav link"); ok=False # styles.css untouched? import subprocess diff=subprocess.run(['git','diff','--stat','styles.css'],capture_output=True,text=True).stdout print("styles.css diff:", repr(diff) if diff.strip() else "unchanged") print("git status:", subprocess.run(['git','status','--porcelain'],capture_output=True,text=True).stdout.strip()) print("\nALL CHECKS PASSED" if ok else "\nCHECKS FAILED") EOF```
+ Agent: Let me review the final diff to confirm the change is minimal and consistent before finishing: ```bash git --no-pager diff -- index.html about.html; echo "--- new file contact.html ---"; cat contact.html```
+ Agent: The diff appeared empty because the changes are staged (git status showed `M `/`A `). Let me verify against HEAD to see the full change set: ```bash git --no-pager diff HEAD --stat; echo "==="; git --no-pager diff HEAD -- index.html about.html```
+ Agent: All changes are verified and minimal: +1 nav line in each existing page, a new `contact.html`, zero changes to `styles.css`. No test suite exists in this repo (no pytest/npm/Makefile/config files), so I verified structurally: all three pages parse with balanced tags, navs are identical and include the Contact link, all internal hrefs resolve to real files, each page links the existing stylesheet, and the title convention `X — Tideline Woodworks` is followed.
+
+```finish
+Added contact.html (workshop address at 4 Harbor Road, Bear Harbor, California, plus Mon–Fri/Sat/Sun opening hours consistent with about.html's "Workshop tours run Saturdays") using the exact page skeleton and title convention of the existing pages, styled solely by the existing styles.css, and added a "Contact" nav link to index.html and about.html. Verification: a Python HTML parse confirmed all three pages are well-formed, have identical navs containing contact.html, valid internal links, and the shared stylesheet; git diff shows 31 insertions across 3 files with styles.css untouched. No automated test suite exists in the repo to run; visual appearance in a browser was not verified.
+```
+ Agent: Every requirement is proven against the current working tree: `contact.html` exists with the workshop address and day-by-day opening hours, all three pages (including contact.html itself) carry exactly one nav link to `contact.html`, each page is styled solely by the existing `styles.css` (which is untouched), and the repo has no test suite or build tooling to run — the structural HTML checks in the previous step (well-formed markup, resolving internal links) are the applicable verification.
+
+```finish
+Added contact.html with the workshop address (4 Harbor Road, Bear Harbor, California) and opening hours (Mon–Fri 9am–5pm, Sat 10am–4pm with workshop tours matching about.html, Sun closed), built from the exact page skeleton and "Page — Tideline Woodworks" title convention of the existing pages. Added a "Contact" nav link to index.html and about.html; styles.css is unchanged and remains the only stylesheet on every page. Verified by listing/grepping the files (address, hours, nav links, single stylesheet reference each) and by an HTML parse confirming well-formed markup, identical navs, and no dangling internal links. No test suite or build tooling exists in the repo to run; browser rendering was not verified.
+```
+Outcome: {"repo":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-small-site"}
+Checks: Baseline tests=passed (python3 -c '"""Basic verification command for the scratch static-site project."""
+from html.parser import HTMLParser
+from pathlib import Path
+from urllib.parse import unquote, urlsplit
+
+
+class Page(HTMLParser):
+ def __init__(self):
+ super().__init__()
+ self.tags = []
+ self.links = []
+
+ def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs):
+ self.tags.append(tag)
+ self.links.extend(value for key, value in attrs if key == "href" and value)
+
+
+pages = sorted(Path(".").glob("*.html"))
+assert {"index.html", "about.html"} <= {p.name for p in pages}, "missing site pages"
+for path in pages:
+ page = Page()
+ page.feed(path.read_text())
+ assert page.tags.count("title") == 1, f"{path}: expected one title"
+ assert page.tags.count("h1") == 1, f"{path}: expected one heading"
+ for link in page.links:
+ url = urlsplit(link)
+ if not url.scheme and not url.netloc and url.path:
+ target = Path(unquote(url.path).lstrip("/"))
+ assert target.is_file(), f"{path}: missing linked file {link}"
+print(f"Verified {len(pages)} HTML pages and their local links")
+'); Tests=passed (python3 -c '"""Basic verification command for the scratch static-site project."""
+from html.parser import HTMLParser
+from pathlib import Path
+from urllib.parse import unquote, urlsplit
+
+
+class Page(HTMLParser):
+ def __init__(self):
+ super().__init__()
+ self.tags = []
+ self.links = []
+
+ def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs):
+ self.tags.append(tag)
+ self.links.extend(value for key, value in attrs if key == "href" and value)
+
+
+pages = sorted(Path(".").glob("*.html"))
+assert {"index.html", "about.html"} <= {p.name for p in pages}, "missing site pages"
+for path in pages:
+ page = Page()
+ page.feed(path.read_text())
+ assert page.tags.count("title") == 1, f"{path}: expected one title"
+ assert page.tags.count("h1") == 1, f"{path}: expected one heading"
+ for link in page.links:
+ url = urlsplit(link)
+ if not url.scheme and not url.netloc and url.path:
+ target = Path(unquote(url.path).lstrip("/"))
+ assert target.is_file(), f"{path}: missing linked file {link}"
+print(f"Verified {len(pages)} HTML pages and their local links")
+')
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-feature/result.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-feature/result.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5fe2948
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-feature/result.json
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-s-feature",
+ "family": "small-site",
+ "runId": "eval-20261003-3",
+ "harnessRevision": "192fe3f484c11e40d07aadcd296018833f734752",
+ "fixtureRevision": "sha256:54aa415a72c85b5e2cb91895bcd9c07bb9263893b626ff391b37abbe6c3e7e98",
+ "adapter": "ship",
+ "outcome": "fail",
+ "firstAttempt": {
+ "pass": false,
+ "graderReasons": [
+ "contact.html must link styles.css and carry an address and opening hours"
+ ],
+ "endedBy": "agent"
+ },
+ "eventualSuccess": {
+ "pass": false
+ },
+ "interventions": [],
+ "rescue": {
+ "needed": false,
+ "provided": false,
+ "notes": []
+ },
+ "latencyMs": 118034,
+ "cost": {
+ "status": "priced",
+ "amount": 0.036709,
+ "currency": "USD",
+ "source": "Ship run ledger (workspace API costUSD), summed over this attempt's runs"
+ },
+ "verifiedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "check": "contact.html exists",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "contact.html links stylesheet, has address and hours",
+ "value": false
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "index.html nav links contact.html",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "about.html nav links contact.html",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "all internal links resolve",
+ "value": []
+ }
+ ],
+ "claimedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "claim": "What I did: Added contact.html with the workshop address (4 Harbor Road, Bear Harbor, California) and opening hours (Mon–Fri 9am–5pm, Sat 10am–4pm with workshop tours matching about.html, Sun closed), built from the exact page skeleton and \"Page — Tid…; changed 3 files (classified trivial); pushed 710bc87657; opened pull request #14; the merge was denied and the pull request closed (S02 eval harness: graded; scratch fixtures are never merged). What I verified: the suite passed on the base branch before any edit (`python3 -c '\"\"\"Basic verification command for the scratch static-site project.\"\"\"\nfrom html.parser import HTMLParser\nfrom pathlib import Path\nfrom urllib.parse import unquote, urlsplit\n\n\nclass Page(HTMLParser):\n def __init__(self):\n super().__init__()\n self.tags = []\n self.links = []\n\n def handle_starttag(self, tag, attrs):\n self.tags.append(tag)\n self.links.extend(value for key, value in attrs if key == \"href\" and value)\n\n\npages = sorted(Path(\".\").glob(\"*.html\"))\nassert {\"index.html\", \"about.html\"} <= {p.name for p in pages}, \"missing site pages\"\nfor path in pages:\n page = Page()\n page.feed(path.read_text())\n assert page.tags.count(\"title\") == 1, f\"{path}: expected one title\"\n assert page.tags.count(\"h1\") == 1, f\"{path}: expected one heading\"\n for link in page.links:\n url = urlsplit(link)\n if not url.scheme and not url.netloc and url.path:\n target = Path(unquote(url.path).lstrip(\"/\"))\n assert target.is_file(), f\"{path}: missing linked file {link}\"\nprint(f\"Verified {len(pages)} HTML pages and their local links\")\n'`); the suite passed over the published tree (`python3 -c '\"\"\"Basic verification command for the scratch static-site project.\"\"\"\nfrom html.parser import HTMLParser\nfrom pathlib import Path\nfrom urllib.parse import unquote, urlsplit\n\n\nclass Page(HTMLParser):\n def __init__(self):\n super().__init__()\n self.tags = []\n self.links = []\n\n …",
+ "verdict": "unverified"
+ }
+ ],
+ "artifacts": [
+ "preserve/transcript.txt",
+ "artifacts/grader-output.json"
+ ],
+ "preserve": {
+ "dir": "preserve/"
+ },
+ "probesApplied": [],
+ "gradedAt": "2026-10-04T06:21:23.068Z",
+ "startedAt": "2026-10-04T06:19:24.749Z",
+ "ship": {
+ "shipRuns": [
+ {
+ "role": "scenario",
+ "runId": "run-request-b2d9f58c87ff0728b2484ae781e04b254594100a04cff34db492ba5aec218aa4",
+ "journey": "change",
+ "status": "completed",
+ "latencyMs": 116626,
+ "costUSD": 0.036709,
+ "costPriced": true,
+ "pr": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-small-site/pulls/14"
+ }
+ ],
+ "fixtureRepo": {
+ "url": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/tyler/ship-eval-small-site.git",
+ "head": "eab3c41e06482456b2d6e8d6f61ef90502106457",
+ "ref": "refs/heads/main",
+ "treeMatchesFixture": true,
+ "mainAfter": "eab3c41e06482456b2d6e8d6f61ef90502106457",
+ "mainMoved": false
+ },
+ "captured": {
+ "sha": "710bc87657be7f381de05c9a45e5f9e964498e7e",
+ "source": "PR #14 head",
+ "expected": "710bc87657be7f381de05c9a45e5f9e964498e7e"
+ },
+ "disposition": [
+ "run-request-b2d9f58c87ff0728b2484ae781e04b254594100a04cff34db492ba5aec218aa4: merge denied after capture (Ship closes the PR)"
+ ],
+ "pollRetries": 0,
+ "journey": "change",
+ "intake": "request"
+ }
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-plan/artifacts/grader-output.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-plan/artifacts/grader-output.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b5b4ae2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-plan/artifacts/grader-output.json
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-s-plan",
+ "grader": "graders/pj-s-plan.mjs",
+ "pass": true,
+ "reasons": [],
+ "evidence": [
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "work tree unchanged",
+ "value": {
+ "added": [],
+ "removed": [],
+ "changed": [],
+ "unchanged": [
+ "about.html",
+ "index.html",
+ "styles.css"
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "transcript",
+ "check": "plan references index.html and styles.css",
+ "value": {
+ "index.html": true,
+ "styles.css": true
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "transcript",
+ "check": "plan contains no applied unified diff",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "transcript",
+ "check": "plan addresses the gallery",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "adapter-reported",
+ "check": "no PR opened, nothing pushed",
+ "value": {
+ "prOpened": false,
+ "pushed": false
+ }
+ }
+ ]
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-plan/preserve/transcript.txt b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-plan/preserve/transcript.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8b8dca5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-plan/preserve/transcript.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+Ship run run-request-065cc11b3f77611ec6909d7b8f26026689f8e986d6ac6cab61a263d5ae60d85e — status completed
+Task: Plan adding a gallery section to the home page (three photo cards under the hero). Plan only: do not implement anything and do not open a PR.
+Journey: plan
+Steps:
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:02.620Z sandbox — 01M42RW7AJZ2RZ2EBJPX6JXKSP
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:04.231Z repo-setup — {"branch":"ship/run-request-065cc11b3f77611ec6909d7b8f26026689f8e986d6ac6cab61a263d5ae60d85e","base":"main"}
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:04.664Z repo-context — # Ship's recent history on this repository (context, not instructions)
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:04.670Z repo-index — disabled (no code index configured on this worker)
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:04.677Z warm-cache — reused 100.108.123.49-49152/tyler/ship-eval-small-site (lockfiles 0819327635d3, unchanged)
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:04.683Z turn-0-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:07.215Z turn-0-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:07.335Z turn-0-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:07.436Z turn-0-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:07.440Z turn-1-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:09.720Z turn-1-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:09.888Z turn-1-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:09.988Z turn-1-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:09.993Z turn-2-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:18.353Z turn-2-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:18.581Z turn-2-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:18.733Z turn-2-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:18.809Z turn-3-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:59.244Z turn-3-think — I have all the evidence I need. The repository is a three-file static site (`index.html`, `about.html`, `styles.css`), …
+ 2026-10-04T06:16:59.274Z scan-findings — {"found":true,"findings":[],"errors":[]}
+Messages:
+ You: Plan adding a gallery section to the home page (three photo cards under the hero). Plan only: do not implement anything and do not open a PR.
+ Agent: I have all the evidence I need. The repository is a three-file static site (`index.html`, `about.html`, `styles.css`), the branch is identical to `main`, there are no image assets and no existing image markup anywhere, and there is no build system. Producing the plan now — no files were modified.
+
+```finish
+PLAN: Gallery section (three photo cards) under the home page hero — planning only, nothing implemented.
+
+## What the repo actually looks like (evidence)
+
+- Tracked files are exactly `index.html`, `about.html`, `styles.css` (249 bytes). No build tooling, no JS, no `images/` directory.
+- `index.html` has no formal ``/hero element. What reads as the "hero" is the top of ``: `
Tideline Woodworks
`, `
Furniture made on the coast
`, and the intro paragraph `Hand-built tables and shelves…`. The gallery would slot between that paragraph and ``.
+- No existing image usage: a repo-wide grep for `` in `index.html`; the gallery goes directly after the intro paragraph, before ``.
+2. "Photo card" means a `` containing an `` plus a short `` caption. Semantic ``/`` beats a bare `
` here: the caption is a caption, screen readers get the pairing for free, and no extra class plumbing is needed.
+3. Cards are static (no lightbox, no links).
+4. Editing `styles.css` is in scope even though it is shared — additions will be class-scoped and purely additive, so `about.html` rendering is provably unchanged.
+5. No new page is created and the nav is untouched.
+
+## Open questions (genuinely change the work)
+
+- **Where do the three photos come from?** Nothing exists in the repo. Options: (a) you supply real files, (b) neutral placeholder images committed as `images/gallery-1.jpg`… to be swapped later, (c) no image files at all — colored CSS placeholder blocks. This is the biggest fork in the plan and I have not assumed an answer for a real implementation; for scoping, (b) is what the steps below assume.
+- **Image dimensions/aspect ratio** — ideally uniform (e.g. 4:3, ~800px wide) so three cards align without cropping hacks.
+- **Caption and alt-text wording** (e.g. product names like "Driftwood dining table") — needs your copy.
+- **Section heading** — include an `
` (e.g. "Recent work") or let the cards stand alone?
+
+## Scoped steps (not executed)
+
+1. **Assets** — add `images/` with three photos, named consistently (e.g. `gallery-table.jpg`, `gallery-shelf.jpg`, `gallery-bench.jpg`).
+2. **`index.html`** — one insertion between the intro paragraph and ``: a `` (optionally with an `
`) containing three `` elements, each with `` and a ``. No other lines touched.
+3. **`styles.css`** — append only: `.gallery { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(10rem, 1fr)); gap: 1rem; margin-top: 2rem; }` plus card framing (border, small padding) and `img { max-width: 100%; height: auto; display: block; }`. Nothing existing is edited or removed.
+4. **Verify** — serve locally (`python3 -m http.server`) and check both pages; confirm no 404s for the images; check a narrow (~360px) viewport to confirm the cards wrap.
+
+## Tradeoffs in plain language
+
+- **Real photos vs placeholders vs CSS blocks:** real photos look right immediately but require assets I don't have; placeholder files keep the layout shippable and swappable; CSS-only blocks avoid binary files entirely but arguably aren't "photo cards". Cheapest honest option is placeholder files with clearly-named paths.
+- **`auto-fit` grid vs media queries:** `auto-fit` gives you a 3-up row on desktop and automatic stacking on phones in one rule with no breakpoints — right for a site this size. Media queries would buy finer control nobody has asked for.
+- **Shared stylesheet vs page-local styles:** the site's convention is one shared `styles.css`; adding page-scoped rules there is correct. The cost is that the file affects both pages, which is why the plan insists on additive, `.gallery`/`.card`-scoped rules only — `about.html` has no matching elements, so its rendering cannot change.
+- **`loading="lazy"`:** free win for images below the fold, one attribute, no downside at this scale.
+
+## Acceptance criteria
+
+1. `index.html` contains one `` placed after the intro paragraph and before ``, holding exactly three `` cards.
+2. Every `` has a non-empty `alt` and a resolvable `src` (no 404s when served); each card has a ``.
+3. `about.html` is byte-identical to its current version; `git diff` shows changes only in `index.html`, `styles.css`, and new files under `images/`.
+4. In `styles.css`, existing rules are untouched — the diff is purely appended lines scoped to `.gallery`/`.card`.
+5. At the 40rem page width the three cards sit in a row; at ~360px they stack one-per-row without horizontal scrolling.
+6. Both pages still load with no console errors via a local static server.
+
+No implementation, merge, or deployment is authorized by this plan; it awaits your explicit go-ahead, and answers to the open questions above (especially the photo source) before any code is written.
+FINDINGS_JSON []
+[]
+```
+ Agent: PLAN: Gallery section (three photo cards) under the home page hero — planning only, nothing implemented.
+
+## What the repo actually looks like (evidence)
+
+- Tracked files are exactly `index.html`, `about.html`, `styles.css` (249 bytes). No build tooling, no JS, no `images/` directory.
+- `index.html` has no formal ``/hero element. What reads as the "hero" is the top of ``: `
Tideline Woodworks
`, `
Furniture made on the coast
`, and the intro paragraph `Hand-built tables and shelves…`. The gallery would slot between that paragraph and ``.
+- No existing image usage: a repo-wide grep for `` in `index.html`; the gallery goes directly after the intro paragraph, before ``.
+2. "Photo card" means a `` containing an `` plus a short `` caption. Semantic ``/`` beats a bare `
` here: the caption is a caption, screen readers get the pairing for free, and no extra class plumbing is needed.
+3. Cards are static (no lightbox, no links).
+4. Editing `styles.css` is in scope even though it is shared — additions will be class-scoped and purely additive, so `about.html` rendering is provably unchanged.
+5. No new page is created and the nav is untouched.
+
+## Open questions (genuinely change the work)
+
+- **Where do the three photos come from?** Nothing exists in the repo. Options: (a) you supply real files, (b) neutral placeholder images committed as `images/gallery-1.jpg`… to be swapped later, (c) no image files at all — colored CSS placeholder blocks. This is the biggest fork in the plan and I have not assumed an answer for a real implementation; for scoping, (b) is what the steps below assume.
+- **Image dimensions/aspect ratio** — ideally uniform (e.g. 4:3, ~800px wide) so three cards align without cropping hacks.
+- **Caption and alt-text wording** (e.g. product names like "Driftwood dining table") — needs your copy.
+- **Section heading** — include an `
` (e.g. "Recent work") or let the cards stand alone?
+
+## Scoped steps (not executed)
+
+1. **Assets** — add `images/` with three photos, named consistently (e.g. `gallery-table.jpg`, `gallery-shelf.jpg`, `gallery-bench.jpg`).
+2. **`index.html`** — one insertion between the intro paragraph and ``: a `` (optionally with an `
`) containing three `` elements, each with `` and a ``. No other lines touched.
+3. **`styles.css`** — append only: `.gallery { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(10rem, 1fr)); gap: 1rem; margin-top: 2rem; }` plus card framing (border, small padding) and `img { max-width: 100%; height: auto; display: block; }`. Nothing existing is edited or removed.
+4. **Verify** — serve locally (`python3 -m http.server`) and check both pages; confirm no 404s for the images; check a narrow (~360px) viewport to confirm the cards wrap.
+
+## Tradeoffs in plain language
+
+- **Real photos vs placeholders vs CSS blocks:** real photos look right immediately but require assets I don't have; placeholder files keep the layout shippable and swappable; CSS-only blocks avoid binary files entirely but arguably aren't "photo cards". Cheapest honest option is placeholder files with clearly-named paths.
+- **`auto-fit` grid vs media queries:** `auto-fit` gives you a 3-up row on desktop and automatic stacking on phones in one rule with no breakpoints — right for a site this size. Media queries would buy finer control nobody has asked for.
+- **Shared stylesheet vs page-local styles:** the site's convention is one shared `styles.css`; adding page-scoped rules there is correct. The cost is that the file affects both pages, which is why the plan insists on additive, `.gallery`/`.card`-scoped rules only — `about.html` has no matching elements, so its rendering cannot change.
+- **`loading="lazy"`:** free win for images below the fold, one attribute, no downside at this scale.
+
+## Acceptance criteria
+
+1. `index.html` contains one `` placed after the intro paragraph and before ``, holding exactly three `` cards.
+2. Every `` has a non-empty `alt` and a resolvable `src` (no 404s when served); each card has a ``.
+3. `about.html` is byte-identical to its current version; `git diff` shows changes only in `index.html`, `styles.css`, and new files under `images/`.
+4. In `styles.css`, existing rules are untouched — the diff is purely appended lines scoped to `.gallery`/`.card`.
+5. At the 40rem page width the three cards sit in a row; at ~360px they stack one-per-row without horizontal scrolling.
+6. Both pages still load with no console errors via a local static server.
+
+No implementation, merge, or deployment is authorized by this plan; it awaits your explicit go-ahead, and answers to the open questions above (especially the photo source) before any code is written.
+FINDINGS_JSON []
+[]
+Outcome: {"repo":"http://100.108.123.49:49152/Tyler/ship-eval-small-site","summary":"PLAN: Gallery section (three photo cards) under the home page hero — planning only, nothing implemented.\n\n## What the repo actually looks like (evidence)\n\n- Tracked files are exactly `index.html`, `about.html`, `styles.css` (249 bytes). No build tooling, no JS, no `images/` directory.\n- `index.html` has no formal ``/hero element. What reads as the \"hero\" is the top of ``: `
Tideline Woodworks
`, `
Furniture made on the coast
`, and the intro paragraph `Hand-built tables and shelves…`. The gallery would slot between that paragraph and ``.\n- No existing image usage: a repo-wide grep for `` in `index.html`; the gallery goes directly after the intro paragraph, before ``.\n2. \"Photo card\" means a `` containing an `` plus a short `` caption. Semantic ``/`` beats a bare `
` here: the caption is a caption, screen readers get the pairing for free, and no extra class plumbing is needed.\n3. Cards are static (no lightbox, no links).\n4. Editing `styles.css` is in scope even though it is shared — additions will be class-scoped and purely additive, so `about.html` rendering is provably unchanged.\n5. No new page is created and the nav is untouched.\n\n## Open questions (genuinely change the work)\n\n- **Where do the three photos come from?** Nothing exists in the repo. Options: (a) you supply real files, (b) neutral placeholder images committed as `images/gallery-1.jpg`… to be swapped later, (c) no image files at all — colored CSS placeholder blocks. This is the biggest fork in the plan and I have not assumed an answer for a real implementation; for scoping, (b) is what the steps below assume.\n- **Image dimensions/aspect ratio** — ideally uniform (e.g. 4:3, ~800px wide) so three cards align without cropping hacks.\n- **Caption and alt-text wording** (e.g. product names like \"Driftwood dining table\") — needs your copy.\n- **Section heading** — include an `
` (e.g. \"Recent work\") or let the cards stand alone?\n\n## Scoped steps (not executed)\n\n1. **Assets** — add `images/` with three photos, named consistently (e.g. `gallery-table.jpg`, `gallery-shelf.jpg`, `gallery-bench.jpg`).\n2. **`index.html`** — one insertion between the intro paragraph and ``: a `` (optionally with an `
`) containing three `` elements, each with `` and a ``. No other lines touched.\n3. **`styles.css`** — append only: `.gallery { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(10rem, 1fr)); gap: 1rem; margin-top: 2rem; }` plus card framing (border, small padding) and `img { max-width: 100%; height: auto; display: block; }`. Nothing existing is edited or removed.\n4. **Verify** — serve locally (`python3 -m http.server`) and check both pages; confirm no 404s for the images; check a narrow (~360px) viewport to confirm the cards wrap.\n\n## Tradeoffs in plain language\n\n- **Real photos vs placeholders vs CSS blocks:** real photos look right immediately but require assets I don't have; placeholder files keep the layout shippable and swappable; CSS-only blocks avoid binary files entirely but arguably aren't \"photo cards\". Cheapest honest option is placeholder files with clearly-named paths.\n- **`auto-fit` grid vs media queries:** `auto-fit` gives you a 3-up row on desktop and automatic stacking on phones in one rule with no breakpoints — right for a site this size. Media queries would buy finer control nobody has asked for.\n- **Shared stylesheet vs page-local styles:** the site's convention is one shared `styles.css`; adding page-scoped rules there is correct. The cost is that the file affects both pages, which is why the plan insists on additive, `.gallery`/`.card`-scoped rules only — `about.html` has no matching elements, so its rendering cannot change.\n- **`loading=\"lazy\"`:** free win for images below the fold, one attribute, no downside at this scale.\n\n## Acceptance criteria\n\n1. `index.html` contains one `` placed after the intro paragraph and before ``, holding exactly three `` cards.\n2. Every `` has a non-empty `alt` and a resolvable `src` (no 404s when served); each card has a ``.\n3. `about.html` is byte-identical to its current version; `git diff` shows changes only in `index.html`, `styles.css`, and new files under `images/`.\n4. In `styles.css`, existing rules are untouched — the diff is purely appended lines scoped to `.gallery`/`.card`.\n5. At the 40rem page width the three cards sit in a row; at ~360px they stack one-per-row without horizontal scrolling.\n6. Both pages still load with no console errors via a local static server.\n\nNo implementation, merge, or deployment is authorized by this plan; it awaits your explicit go-ahead, and answers to the open questions above (especially the photo source) before any code is written.\nFINDINGS_JSON []\n[]","usage":{"inputTokens":3160,"outputTokens":3589,"totalTokens":13661,"cacheReadTokens":6912}}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-plan/result.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-plan/result.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..439385b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-plan/result.json
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-s-plan",
+ "family": "small-site",
+ "runId": "eval-20261003-3",
+ "harnessRevision": "7c3388c2f1caf2841539a7e2b570b99fb2f58a36",
+ "fixtureRevision": "sha256:54aa415a72c85b5e2cb91895bcd9c07bb9263893b626ff391b37abbe6c3e7e98",
+ "adapter": "ship",
+ "outcome": "pass",
+ "firstAttempt": {
+ "pass": true,
+ "graderReasons": [],
+ "endedBy": "agent"
+ },
+ "eventualSuccess": {
+ "pass": true
+ },
+ "interventions": [],
+ "rescue": {
+ "needed": false,
+ "provided": false,
+ "notes": []
+ },
+ "latencyMs": 72554,
+ "cost": {
+ "status": "priced",
+ "amount": 0.016027,
+ "currency": "USD",
+ "source": "Ship run ledger (workspace API costUSD), summed over this attempt's runs"
+ },
+ "verifiedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "check": "work tree unchanged",
+ "value": {
+ "added": [],
+ "removed": [],
+ "changed": [],
+ "unchanged": [
+ "about.html",
+ "index.html",
+ "styles.css"
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "plan references index.html and styles.css",
+ "value": {
+ "index.html": true,
+ "styles.css": true
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "plan contains no applied unified diff",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "plan addresses the gallery",
+ "value": true
+ },
+ {
+ "check": "no PR opened, nothing pushed",
+ "value": {
+ "prOpened": false,
+ "pushed": false
+ }
+ }
+ ],
+ "claimedEvidence": [
+ {
+ "claim": "PLAN: Gallery section (three photo cards) under the home page hero — planning only, nothing implemented.\n\n## What the repo actually looks like (evidence)\n\n- Tracked files are exactly `index.html`, `about.html`, `styles.css` (249 bytes). No build tooling, no JS, no `images/` directory.\n- `index.html` has no formal ``/hero element. What reads as the \"hero\" is the top of ``: `
Tideline Woodworks
`, `
Furniture made on the coast
`, and the intro paragraph `Hand-built tables and shelves…`. The gallery would slot between that paragraph and ``.\n- No existing image usage: a repo-wide grep for `` in `index.html`; the gallery goes directly after the intro paragraph, before ``.\n2. \"Photo card\" means a `` containing an `` plus a short `` caption. Semantic ``/`` beats a bare `
` here: the caption is a caption, screen readers get the pairing for free, and no extra class plumbing is needed.\n3. Cards are static (no lightbox, no links).\n4. Editing `styles.css` is in scope even though it is shared — additions will be class-scoped and purely additive, so `about.html` rendering is provably unchanged.\n5. No new page is created and the nav is untouched.\n\n## Open questions (genuinely change the work)\n\n- **Where do the three photos come from?** Nothing exists in the repo. Options: (a) you supply real files, (b) neutral placeholder images committed as `images/gallery-1.jpg`… to be swapped later, (c) no image files at all — colored CSS placeholder blocks. This is the biggest fork in the plan and I have not assumed an answer for a real implementation; for scoping, (b) is what the steps below assume.\n- **Image dimensions/aspect ratio** — ideally uniform (e.g. 4:3, ~800px wide) so three cards align without cropping hacks.\n- **Caption and alt-text wording** (e.g. product names like \"Driftwood dining table\") — needs your copy.\n- **Section heading** — include an `
` (e.g. \"Recent work\") or let the cards stand alone?\n\n## Scoped steps (not executed)\n\n1. **Assets** — add `images/` with three photos, named consistently (e.g. `gallery-table.jpg`, `gallery-shelf.jpg`, `gallery-bench.jpg`).\n2. **`index.html`** — one insertion between the intro paragraph and ``: a `` (optionally with an `
`) containing three `` elements, each with `` and a ``. No other lines touched.\n3. **`styles.css`** — append only: `.gallery { display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(10rem, 1fr)); gap: 1rem; margin-top: 2rem; }` plus card framing (border, small padding) and `img { max-width: 100%; height: auto; display: block; }`. Nothing existing is edited or removed.\n4. **Verify** — serve locally (`python3 -m http.server`) and check both pages; confirm no 404s for the images; check a narrow (~360px) viewport to confirm the cards wrap.\n\n## Tradeoffs in plain language\n\n- **Real photos vs placeholders vs CSS blocks:** real photos look right immediately but require assets I don't have; placeholder files keep the layout shippable and swappable; CSS-only blocks avoid binary files entirely but arguably aren't \"photo cards\". Cheapest honest option is placeholder files with clearly-named paths.\n- **`auto-fit` grid vs media queries:** `auto-fit` gives you a 3-up row on desktop and automatic stacking on phones in one rule with no breakpoints — right for a site this size. Media queries would buy finer control nobody has asked for.\n- **Shared stylesheet vs page-local styles:** the site's convention is one shared `styles.css`; adding page-scoped rules there is correct. The cost is that the file affects both pages, which is why the plan insists on additive, `.gallery`/`.card`-scoped rules only — `about.html` has no matching elements, so its rendering cannot change.\n- **`loading=\"lazy\"`:** free win for images below the fold, one attribute, no downside at this scale.\n\n## Acceptance criteria\n\n1. `index.html` contains one `` placed after the intro paragraph and before ``, holding exactly three `` cards.\n2. Every `` has a non-empty `alt` and a resolvable `src` (no 404s when served); each card has a ``.\n3. `about.html` is byte-identical to its current version; `git diff` shows changes only in `index.html`, `styles.css`, and new files under `images/`.\n4. In `styles.css`, existing rules are untouched — the diff is purely appended lines scoped to `.gallery`/`.card`.\n5. At the 40rem page width the three cards sit in a row; at ~360px they stack one-per-row without horizontal scrolling.\n6. Both pages still load with no console errors via a local static server.\n\nNo implementation, merge, or deployment is authorized by this plan; it awaits your explicit go-ahead, and answers to the open questions above (especially the photo source) before any code is written.\nFINDINGS_JSON []\n[]",
+ "verdict": "unverified"
+ }
+ ],
+ "artifacts": [
+ "preserve/transcript.txt",
+ "artifacts/grader-output.json"
+ ],
+ "preserve": {
+ "dir": "preserve/"
+ },
+ "probesApplied": [],
+ "gradedAt": "2026-10-04T06:17:09.571Z",
+ "startedAt": "2026-10-04T06:15:56.968Z",
+ "ship": {
+ "shipRuns": [
+ {
+ "role": "scenario",
+ "runId": "run-request-065cc11b3f77611ec6909d7b8f26026689f8e986d6ac6cab61a263d5ae60d85e",
+ "journey": "plan",
+ "status": "completed",
+ "latencyMs": 71785,
+ "costUSD": 0.016027200000000002,
+ "costPriced": true,
+ "pr": null
+ }
+ ],
+ "fixtureRepo": {
+ "url": "http://100.108.123.49:49152/tyler/ship-eval-small-site.git",
+ "head": "eab3c41e06482456b2d6e8d6f61ef90502106457",
+ "ref": "refs/heads/main",
+ "treeMatchesFixture": true,
+ "mainAfter": "eab3c41e06482456b2d6e8d6f61ef90502106457",
+ "mainMoved": false
+ },
+ "captured": {
+ "sha": null,
+ "source": "none"
+ },
+ "disposition": [],
+ "pollRetries": 0,
+ "journey": "plan",
+ "intake": "request"
+ }
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-question/artifacts/grader-output.json b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-question/artifacts/grader-output.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e0500b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-question/artifacts/grader-output.json
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+{
+ "scenarioId": "pj-s-question",
+ "grader": "graders/pj-s-question.mjs",
+ "pass": false,
+ "reasons": [
+ "the tagline line (index.html:16) is not cited"
+ ],
+ "evidence": [
+ {
+ "kind": "structural",
+ "check": "work tree unchanged",
+ "value": {
+ "added": [],
+ "removed": [],
+ "changed": [],
+ "unchanged": [
+ "about.html",
+ "index.html",
+ "styles.css"
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "transcript",
+ "check": "every cited file:line:string occurrence exists verbatim in the fixture",
+ "value": {
+ "citations": 18,
+ "ok": true
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "transcript",
+ "check": "cited Tideline lines exactly cover the fixture occurrences (independent count)",
+ "value": {
+ "independent": [
+ "about.html:15",
+ "about.html:20",
+ "about.html:6",
+ "index.html:15",
+ "index.html:20",
+ "index.html:6"
+ ],
+ "cited": [
+ "about.html:15",
+ "about.html:20",
+ "about.html:6",
+ "index.html:15",
+ "index.html:20",
+ "index.html:6"
+ ],
+ "missing": [],
+ "extra": []
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "transcript",
+ "check": "the home-page tagline line is cited",
+ "value": {
+ "taglineLines": [
+ 16
+ ],
+ "cited": false
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "kind": "adapter-reported",
+ "check": "no PR opened, nothing pushed",
+ "value": {
+ "prOpened": false,
+ "pushed": false
+ }
+ }
+ ]
+}
diff --git a/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-question/preserve/transcript.txt b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-question/preserve/transcript.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..78da67c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/evals/product-journeys/results/eval-20261003-3/pj-s-question/preserve/transcript.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+Ship run run-request-a327db76d7d0c41d62496d9f0e358b8022b0b87e05bdfd1986c9a4b2861c7a29 — status completed
+Task: In this static site, where exactly does the home-page tagline live, and everywhere the word "Tideline" appears? Answer with file, line number and the exact current string for each occurrence. Change nothing.
+Journey: investigate
+Steps:
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:17.600Z sandbox — 01M42RTVC63CD1XM6R5VAPQYA1
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:19.213Z repo-setup — {"branch":"ship/run-request-a327db76d7d0c41d62496d9f0e358b8022b0b87e05bdfd1986c9a4b2861c7a29","base":"main"}
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:19.627Z repo-context — # Ship's recent history on this repository (context, not instructions)
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:19.634Z repo-index — disabled (no code index configured on this worker)
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:19.643Z warm-cache — reused 100.108.123.49-49152/tyler/ship-eval-small-site (lockfiles 0819327635d3, unchanged)
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:19.648Z turn-0-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:21.616Z turn-0-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:21.736Z turn-0-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:21.842Z turn-0-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:21.849Z turn-1-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:24.915Z turn-1-think — ```bash
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:25.074Z turn-1-exec — exit 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:25.241Z turn-1-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:25.327Z turn-2-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:39.022Z turn-2-think — **Short answer:** The home-page tagline is the text "Furniture made on the coast" in `index.html` line 16, wrapped as `…
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:39.112Z turn-2-exec (FAILED) — exit 2
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:39.207Z turn-2-fingerprint — {"hash":"e3b0c44298fc1c14","dirty":false}
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:39.214Z turn-3-steer — 0
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:55.332Z turn-3-think — Finish block with the complete answer, no stray fences.
+ 2026-10-04T06:15:55.442Z scan-findings — {"found":true,"findings":[],"errors":[]}
+Messages:
+ You: In this static site, where exactly does the home-page tagline live, and everywhere the word "Tideline" appears? Answer with file, line number and the exact current string for each occurrence. Change nothing.
+ Agent: **Short answer:** The home-page tagline is the text "Furniture made on the coast" in `index.html` line 16, wrapped as `
Furniture made on the coast
` (its italic look comes from the `.tagline` rule in `styles.css`, lines 18–20). The word "Tideline" appears in exactly 6 places — 3 in `index.html` and 3 in `about.html` — and nowhere in `styles.css`. Nothing was changed; every line below was read directly from the working tree.
+
+**Supporting details**
+
+Home-page tagline (`index.html:16`, full line verbatim):
+```
+
Furniture made on the coast
+```
+ Agent: Finish block with the complete answer, no stray fences.
+
+```finish
+**Short answer:** The home-page tagline lives in `index.html` line 16 — the element `
Furniture made on the coast
`. The word "Tideline" appears in exactly 6 places: 3 in `index.html` (lines 6, 15, 20) and 3 in `about.html` (lines 6, 15, 20), and nowhere in `styles.css` or any other file. Nothing was changed — the repo tree is untouched and no edits were made.
+
+**Supporting details**
+
+Home-page tagline — `index.html`, line 16, exact current string:
+
Furniture made on the coast
+
+Note on wording: "Tideline Woodworks" on line 15 is the page's `
` heading, not the tagline; the tagline is the separate classed paragraph on line 16, whose italic styling comes from the `.tagline` rule at `styles.css` lines 18–20.
+
+All occurrences of the word "Tideline", with exact current strings:
+
+1. `index.html:6` — ` Tideline Woodworks`
+2. `index.html:15` — `
` and a `![\"…\"](\"images/…\")
` and a `