Skip to content

Unclear language in Signing and Verification spec #158

@extua

Description

@extua

In WACZ Signing and Verification section 4.1.1, the text under the example reads:

With this approach, the WACZ contains just enough to validate that they signature with the publicKey.

This reads like it's missing a word, could it be clarified?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions