After a participant votes on a statement, Agora can optionally show extracted claims from that statement and let the participant vote on each claim.
This lets participants express why they voted that way and can reduce frustration when a single agree/unsure/disagree vote feels too limited, without turning statements into open-ended reply threads that invite trolling, harassment, off-topic debate, or attention drift.
It also helps facilitators understand which specific ideas inside a statement drive agreement, disagreement, or uncertainty, improving clustering and common-ground results.
After a participant votes on a statement, Agora can optionally show extracted claims from that statement and let the participant vote on each claim.
This lets participants express why they voted that way and can reduce frustration when a single agree/unsure/disagree vote feels too limited, without turning statements into open-ended reply threads that invite trolling, harassment, off-topic debate, or attention drift.
It also helps facilitators understand which specific ideas inside a statement drive agreement, disagreement, or uncertainty, improving clustering and common-ground results.