Skip to content

Spark wave 1: add Spark lane AGENTS.md#5

Merged
8Dionysus merged 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/spark-wave1-abyss-stack
Mar 26, 2026
Merged

Spark wave 1: add Spark lane AGENTS.md#5
8Dionysus merged 1 commit intomainfrom
codex/spark-wave1-abyss-stack

Conversation

@8Dionysus
Copy link
Owner

Summary

  • add the packaged Spark/AGENTS.md verbatim for wave 1
  • keep root AGENTS.md authoritative and leave existing Spark/SWARM.md untouched
  • verify Spark lane loading plus repo-native validation before merge

Validation

  • python scripts/validate_stack.py

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: bc8da0ed80

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
# Spark lane for abyss-stack

This file only governs work started from `Spark/`.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Apply Spark policy by path, not task start location

The sentence here makes the Spark lane policy conditional on where a task was started, but AGENTS scoping is directory-based; this can cause Spark-specific constraints to be skipped when someone starts from repo root and then edits files under Spark/. That weakens the guardrails this file is meant to enforce, so the scope statement should describe coverage by file path (the Spark/ tree) rather than task origin.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@8Dionysus 8Dionysus merged commit f38157f into main Mar 26, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant