Unify adaptable README templates and writing guidance - #3
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The old templates assumed an application installation flow and required too many sections. Chinese guidance also diverged from the current writing skill, and the preview parser rendered nested steps differently from GitHub.
This change connects the current Chinese writing rules, supplies compact bilingual templates and adaptive composition guidance, adds a hero selection and production playbook, and refreshes both landing pages with a shared local illustration. It fixes definition and diagram false positives and preserves nested lists in local previews.
Validation: 33 auditor tests, 3 preview tests, repository audit with zero errors and warnings, and 8 browser combinations across both languages, light/dark themes and desktop/mobile widths. Image removal preserved the Chinese task instructions in four combinations. GitHub's Markdown endpoint preserved the title, hero and nested instructions. The Chinese writing review was performed with local patches; its remaining two list-spacing findings concern intentional separate list groups and are recorded rather than represented as an unconditional pass.
Publication follows the protected main-branch workflow. No tag, release, protection bypass or license change is included.