Allow permissionless cranking of due recurring payments - #552
Merged
thegreatfeez merged 1 commit intoAug 31, 2026
Merged
Conversation
|
@akprinciple is attempting to deploy a commit to the thegreatfeez's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
@akprinciple Great news! 🎉 Based on an automated assessment of this PR, the linked Wave issue(s) no longer count against your application limits. You can now already apply to more issues while waiting for a review of this PR. Keep up the great work! 🚀 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #449
Summary
This PR implements a permissionless execution model for
disburse_recurring, allowing any address to trigger due payouts on active recurring payment schedules.Under this model, any caller can execute the disbursement crank once a schedule becomes due, provided the contract is not frozen and the schedule remains eligible for settlement. The restrictive owner-only requirement has been removed while retaining all core safety and freeze validations.
Background & Architectural Trade-offs
The design decision centered on whether recurring disbursement execution should be restricted to contract owners or open as a public keeper crank:
Adopting a permissionless pattern balances high automation reliability with robust contract safety by preserving freeze controls and strict eligibility criteria.
What Changed
require_ownercheck from the activedisburse_recurringentrypoint.caller.require_auth()and therequire_not_frozen(&env)?state validation.Why