docs: container build now PROVEN — real docker build + run of the Dockerfile#82
Merged
Merged
Conversation
… build + run Network access went to full, so the council's largest unverified gap (R3/S3: "the Dockerfile was never built; proof binary was host-compiled") is now closed. Executed the committed Dockerfile's exact build sequence under Docker 29.3/buildkit: both stages, the --release workspace compile (~3m10s, optimized), multi-stage runtime image (169 MB). Ran the resulting CONTAINER against Postgres — from inside the image it self-applied migrations, loaded the HYDRATE=1 seed, and served the 40-card board over /api/v3 (/health + /health/ready both 200; anonymous DELETE 204 under the demo posture as designed). The only delta from the committed Dockerfile was sandbox-local CA/proxy plumbing for apt/cargo egress (a real builder with direct internet needs none of it) — build logic, context coverage, compile, and runtime are the committed ones. Updated the Evidence-status section accordingly; the Railway-platform leg (DATABASE_URL auto-inject, builder env, healthcheck routing) remains the only "expected, confirm on first deploy" item. Doc-only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01U9t3fRwXmPC6tCpMtnfTrM
Bugbot couldn't run - usage limit reachedBugbot is counted against Cursor usage for this user or team, and this run hit a usage or spend limit. A user or team admin can review and increase usage limits in the Cursor dashboard. (requestId: serverGenReqId_3caafdee-4f6e-4a5b-a39f-d52a4add6ab5) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With full network access I closed the council's biggest unverified gap (R3/S3: "the Dockerfile was never built; the proof binary was host-compiled").
Executed the committed Dockerfile's exact build sequence under Docker 29.3/buildkit:
cargo build --release -p op-servercompiles (~3m10s, optimized);HYDRATE=1seed, and served the 40-card board over/api/v3(/health+/health/readyboth 200; anonymousDELETE204 under the demo posture, as designed).The only delta from the committed Dockerfile was sandbox-local CA/proxy plumbing for
apt/cargoegress — a real builder with direct internet needs none of it; the build logic, context coverage, compile, and runtime are the committed ones.Doc-only: the Evidence-status section now marks the container image PROVEN; the Railway-platform leg (DATABASE_URL auto-inject, builder env, healthcheck routing) remains the only "confirm on first deploy" item.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01U9t3fRwXmPC6tCpMtnfTrM