Conversation
- declare bounded specialist outputs and carry verified files - enforce safe materialization and capability fencing - add regression coverage and record pending acceptance 🧩 - Generated by Copilot Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Browser-interface increment - September 17Local commit The parent verification reran 64/64 passing contract tests: nine new cases plus 55 existing owned-stack/source-identity cases, with zero failures or skips. Four Node syntax checks and whitespace/evidence-metadata checks also passed. The earlier 24/24 Rust materializer regression is retained; these counts are separate test families, not proof of end-to-end acceptance. The committed tree exactly matches the verified working-tree fingerprint No browser, services, database, provider or Factory execution was performed for the interface increment. Real browser/runtime qualification requires an adopted, exact owned-QA context and qualified candidate processes/assets/tooling; private controller-schema compatibility is not asserted. The PR remains draft. No push, merge, deployment or acceptance/closure claim is made. Earlier materializer checkpoint (retained)@rajesh-ms, a bounded local test increment now exercises the real Rust dependency-file materializer into the existing deterministic Node synthesis fixture. It checks consumption/replay of four declared files and rejects summary-only input and same-length file tampering. The focused materializer family passed 23/23 at the existing candidate, then 24/24 with the new regression: one additional test, not 47 unique tests. The expanded run had zero failures/ignored tests and 214 filtered tests. Offline test build, formatting, fixture Node syntax and whitespace checks also passed. Source boundary: published PR HEAD is still This is materializer/child-fixture regression evidence, not the required browser-consumption or adversarial end-to-end interface and not native Factory acceptance. I am continuing the guarded interface implementation separately. No server/database/provider was started for this increment; SQLx, workspace/Clippy/web gates, portable R4 fixtures and actual independent owner/admin approval remain outstanding. Dan's bounded integration proposal has been acknowledged. Its combined-candidate evidence remains separate. The PR stays draft; no issue closure, publication, merge or deployment is implied. |
🧪 - Generated by Copilot Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
- cover all 23 cases with guarded test-only executors - keep isolation and symlink qualification gaps explicit 🧪 - Generated by Copilot Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Offline adversarial-fixture increment (not acceptance)The AI-assisted test increment is committed locally as Verified results:
Two concrete qualification gaps remain:
@rajesh-ms, the second point needs an explicit requirement/isolation decision before this acceptance claim can pass. It is a demonstrated gap against the stronger acceptance condition, not a claim that a worktree or job object provides a security boundary. Broader strict Clippy remains blocked by an unchanged baseline store warning. Live browser-to-server-to-runner checks, full production-migration/HTTP identity qualification, R4 and independent owner approval remain outstanding. Earlier failed runs and the two unqualified observations are retained. This supersedes the unsupported/adversarial-implementation status in the earlier checkpoint, not its historical results. The PR stays draft. No push, merge, issue closure, provider inference or Factory dispatch was performed. |
- preserve handoff and cost-admission regressions - retain source-bound checks and acceptance limits 🧩 - Generated by Copilot Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
- preserve handoff, cost and finished-review behavior - record scoped web, native and database validation 🧩 - Generated by Copilot Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Pinned main integration checkpointThe author push of This integrates pinned main The first merge retained both sets of planner tests and added a combined handoff/cost-boundary regression. The second merge had no textual conflicts; the incoming activity UI and narrow finished-review behavior were retained without new production edits. Validation for the final pinned candidate:
Dependencies were restored from the exact approved cached graph after the missing-layout failure; tracked manifests/locks and supply-chain checks were preserved. Earlier failures and source-bound receipts remain retained.
The new merge commits are local only until the author pushes them. Published PR HEAD remains The subsequent Dynamic agent teams lifecycle sequence is tracked under existing #48, not a duplicate epic. |
Summary
Deliver declared specialist research files into a dependent synthesis agent's own isolated workspace through the existing verified typed-artifact path.
Refs #297. This is a draft for coordination and verification, not a claim that the issue's acceptance criteria or pinned native Factory delivery contract are complete.
Validation
Review coordination
@rajesh-ms, you are the creator of #297; please verify the artifact/authority boundary and acceptance evidence when ready. After afateen accepted the collaborator invitation, GitHub accepted the formal review request to you. Issue #297 is now assigned to afateen, who is also this PR's author. The PR remains a draft, and independent outcome approval and the remaining acceptance gates are still outstanding.
@dstkwll: please flag overlap with #294's verifier-cache and workspace-preservation changes. No changes from that PR were copied.
The local Copilot workflow and helper-module scope were explicitly authorized by the contributor. The native controller allowlist and retained Factory execution/publication lane still need coordination; this draft does not substitute for that lane.
Evidence and scope
Source base:
b2523964e7576cafc00e84a51e1044f55826dea7. Candidate:ca15684b84710dbc6450c20b9117f62f89d38887.No private transcripts, credentials, local tool installations or QA databases are included. No merge or deployment is requested.
Post-publication validation update
The actual runner unit-test target was rebuilt with Rust's already installed LLD linker. Its 23 Windows
dependency_files::testspassed in 1.48 seconds: zero failed, zero ignored, 214 unrelated tests filtered out. Coverage includes exact bytes/replay, scope, size boundaries, aliases, unequal existing content, hard links, junctions and retained-handle concurrency.The source checkout remains clean at
ca15684b84710dbc6450c20b9117f62f89d38887. Runner test executable SHA-256:e82c236a86809e2e692e9fc889374ee31a7f34cfb1a464ba82e44110ab0e3c03. Materializer source SHA-256 remains3777ad30ecdccd69cce7b40d6df08db33a1d380487081527eb9d89e316683927, matching the committed evidence record's working-file fingerprint.With the Rust 1.94 GNU environment loaded, the build and test commands were:
The test process used owned disposable TEMP/TMP directories. DEP and other OS protections were unchanged. The package-specific build also selected dependency feature variants, so this is not claimed as a byte-identical linker-only A/B diagnosis. It proves this candidate's native materialization tests, not browser, signed-artifact, SQL or full Factory acceptance. The committed evidence document retains the earlier GNU-linked results as a historical snapshot.