Skip to content

Feature/storage/content validation stress fix#49255

Open
gunjansingh-msft wants to merge 11 commits into
feature/storage/content-validationfrom
feature/storage/content-validation-stress-fix
Open

Feature/storage/content validation stress fix#49255
gunjansingh-msft wants to merge 11 commits into
feature/storage/content-validationfrom
feature/storage/content-validation-stress-fix

Conversation

@gunjansingh-msft
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Please add an informative description that covers that changes made by the pull request and link all relevant issues.

If an SDK is being regenerated based on a new swagger spec, a link to the pull request containing these swagger spec changes has been included above.

All SDK Contribution checklist:

  • The pull request does not introduce [breaking changes]
  • CHANGELOG is updated for new features, bug fixes or other significant changes.
  • I have read the contribution guidelines.

General Guidelines and Best Practices

  • Title of the pull request is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For more information on cleaning up the commits in your PR, see this page.

Testing Guidelines

  • Pull request includes test coverage for the included changes.

gunjansingh-msft and others added 11 commits May 26, 2026 01:53
* removed enableDeterministic

* change .delete() to .deleteIfExists()

* remove Sinks.EmitFailureHandler.FAIL_FAST from CrcInputStream

- read functions had FAIL_FAST which would throw an error when  the stream had reached then end and we wanted to read from the stream again. So we removed from  both reads.
- refactor code so that the exit criteria is a tthe beginning
- refactor the emitContentInfo for dry

* prevent crashes on reattempted close on stream

- changed emitValue to tryEmitValue
- remove Sinks.EmitFailureHandler.FAIL_FAST so that multiple closes does not cause an error to be thrown

* fix telemetry so that it doesnt swallow errors

* roll back two deps because they were causing failures in the containers

- opentelemetry-runtime-telemetry-java8 from 2.24.0-alpha -> 2.15.0-alpha
- opentelemetry-logback-appender-1.0 from 2.24.0-alpha -> 2.15.0-alpha

* rollback azure-client-sdk-parent linting extensions from 1.0.0-beta.2 t0 beta.1

* revert linting extensions to beta2

* remove comments with old code

* add logging for errors

* remove catches for double close issue and okay status

* recursively delete files then delete the directory

* change to sync deletes, refactor for easier reading

* restructing share clean up so super calls only once

* incorporate copilot suggestions

* incorporate copilot suggestions

* incorporate copilot suggestions

* incorporate copilot suggestions

* fix all deletes to make sync and wrap in try-catch

* fix tests so that super.globalCleanupAsync() is only called once

* change telemetry to loggin only returns final state instead of failed retries when ultimately successful

* undo versio downgrade for linting-extensions

* Fixing spacing in error messages

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* refactor datalake delete all so that it is easier to read

* refactor runAsync in ShareScenarioBase so retry failures dont show as failures upon success

---------

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Export the fault injector certificate as PEM and wait for it before importing it into the Java truststore so storage stress tests fail fast instead of hitting PKIX errors.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files) label May 25, 2026
@browndav-msft browndav-msft requested a review from fzuluaga May 26, 2026 14:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Storage Storage Service (Queues, Blobs, Files)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants