Repository navigation
Separate media-kit publication from profile picture selection - #364
Conversation
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
[AGENT] Claude ReviewClaude review for commit This is not a current review or approval. |
…dia-kit-publication
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: a9d5fe1e74
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
PR verification reportAll configured preview and verification checks passed.
Changed visual baselines: none. Updated from Baseline Checks run 38454370541, attempt 1 for |
|
[AGENT] Claude capability finding addressed in b3b4b37 using the shared publicKitAvailable predicate and submission gate. New disabled-gate regressions preserve historical receipt recovery. Independent review passed. The corresponding Codex thread was replied to and resolved before this push. The docs build and two upload findings are also fixed and independently reviewed; authenticated staging acceptance is being rerun. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b89889f60d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: cebb456ee9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
[AGENT] Claude empty-slot replacement finding and the related Codex feedback are fixed in 4702c5d, independently reviewed. Empty replacement admission/approval is refused, inherited scoped reviewer queues route to new proposal IDs, migration provenance survives completion, and restriction/read boundaries are bounded. The failed staged RPC proposal timing defect is reproduced locally and the fixture now waits for the existing cooldown; exact-head hosted verification will rerun. Direct unbatched ordinary-reviewer assignment remains a follow-up, with the existing distinct-admin route preserved. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 4702c5d636
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 786fa60d65
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: fec2860fa7
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
[AGENT] Media contributions now publish to the media kit. Selecting a profile picture is a separate action. Contributor-requested replacements reuse the published asset and require independent review. The website checklist is removed, and MCP exposes matching contribution inspection, correction, removal and placement commands.
Existing pictures, historical receipts and stored media are preserved. The bounded migration defaults to dry-run, and the explicit Karly correction requires unchanged asset, placement and selection evidence. Deployment and production conversion are separate operator steps.
Validation: task-scoped implementer/reviewer rounds; backend, contracts, MCP, web, generated-code and markdown checks; desktop/mobile fixture screenshots. The authenticated exact-head staging lifecycle passed for
4aca25eab443d5b007a7370b7052304ec66c0f6bin run 38456308026. All 13 stages passed, including minted direct upload, website/MCP publication and management, distinct assigned-reviewer approval/rejection and replacement, stale/revoked command refusals, expired upload replay refusal and verified cleanup. Staging intake was restored to its paused baseline afterward.Review limitations: Claude stopped before inference at its configured 500,000-byte PR-input limit, and Copilot could not review because of its quota. The latest GitHub Codex review covers
0959c3a; the final test-only credit assertion change at4aca25epassed independent scoped review. These are not Claude or Copilot approvals.