docs: declare the plane and status above the fold - #11
Merged
Conversation
Part of the portfolio map (Barnett-Studios/dotclaude#124). Nine repos with no map read as sprawl; nine repos each declaring an architectural position read as a system. 'Integrity plane · Active' is stated because the alternative signal is worse. A quiet repo reads as abandoned by default, and for a component whose scope is genuinely finished that is the wrong inference -- so the line says which it is rather than leaving a reader to guess from commit activity.
lyubomir-bozhinov
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 5, 2026 10:55
Member
Author
|
Approved. Three lines, and the two claims in them both check out: the plane assignment matches the slot this component fills in the consuming assembly's component model, and the status matches the repo's actual state. Worth noting the badge above it still reads |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part A2 of Barnett-Studios/dotclaude#124 — the portfolio map.
Adds one line at the top of the README: Integrity plane · Active, plus a link to the new org component map.
Why the label is worth the two lines it costs: a repo with quiet commit activity reads as abandoned by default. For a component whose scope is genuinely complete that inference is wrong, and there is no way for a reader to tell the two apart from the outside. Stating it is the only fix — archiving would assert the opposite of what is true.
No scope change, no code change.