Add false risk detection#39
Open
ramyacm23 wants to merge 6 commits into
Open
Conversation
Owner
|
@ramyacm23 display me this on local by scanning any Tumor MRI.
|
Author
okay |
Author
|
Author
|
@Brijeshthummar02 , kindly check with it |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.






📌 Related Issue
Closes #18
🧠 Description
This PR introduces a secondary safety-checking mechanism to reduce the risk of dangerous false negatives in brain tumor detection.
Previously, the model could return "No Tumor" predictions without any mechanism to identify potentially suspicious or uncertain negative outputs. This update adds uncertainty-aware review logic that flags risky predictions as
UNCERTAIN_SCANand recommends manual review.The enhancement improves prediction reliability for edge-case MRI scans such as:
✨ Changes Implemented
🔍 Uncertainty Estimation
Added Monte Carlo Dropout support during inference
Implemented repeated stochastic forward passes
Computes:
Negative predictions are flagged when:
0.75🩺 Prediction Metadata
Added:
prediction_statusrequires_manual_reviewsafety_check🎨 Frontend Improvements
Updated UI to display:
Review RecommendedUNCERTAIN_SCANstatus for suspicious negative scans🛠️ Runtime Stability Improvements
📊 Example Responses
✅ Confident Negative Scan
{ "prediction_status": "CLEAR", "requires_manual_review": false }{ "prediction_status": "UNCERTAIN_SCAN", "requires_manual_review": true }✅ Verification & Testing
app.pyutilities.pystatic/js/script.js/api/healthendpoint returns healthy statusFull prediction testing could not be completed locally because:
weights.hdf5weights_seg.hdf5are not present in the current workspace.
🧪 Type of Change