Open
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @JManion32! 👋
Your private repo does not have access to Sourcery.
Please upgrade to continue using Sourcery ✨
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a reusable wrapper module for API usage.
client.tsis the sole file that makes a requestusers.ts,auth.ts,events.ts,organizations.ts) are split just like the API is split.AuthContext.tsxto use the new wrapper module (still working on making it perfect)We need to give the API a look. There are some missing fields in responses that probably should be there. Additionally, some of the responses aren't consistent, so I had to make a lot of types. I could probably look into making some of the type fields optional to remedy this.
Using the Wrapper
Ideally it will be used in hooks. I didn't abstract the
AuthContextbecause its a little messy (which is probably fine since its a context).