docs: clarify P12 partial classification interpretation - #33
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Clarifies that the retained P12 “partially consistent” label is not evidence of one correct and one incorrect subclaim. CESE and ASE are different estimands; the full same-estimand independent six-point comparison remains incomplete. No frozen results, verdict counts, release assets, or scientific calculations are changed.
Updated the English and Chinese homepages and their SHA-256 manifest entries. Local checks passed: release package integrity, frozen evidence, bilingual navigation, WSL release boundaries, and V0.3 package integrity.