Present state-based evaluation with a focused experiment guide - #20
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The homepage now introduces the authorization question, separates the current buyer controls from the historical 600-trial campaign, and makes independent SQL grading visible. A custom cover connects the project to CityBuddy and ShopMate. The complete experimental conditions and historical discussion remain in
docs/EXPERIMENTS.md.Validation: relative documentation links, SVG parsing and
git diff --checkpassed.make checkpassed on the complete rerun: 147 unit tests and 26 ShopMate host tests, plus boundary and syntax checks. The first local run timed out waiting for the fixture in two signal-cleanup subcases; the unchanged test passed in isolation, then the full suite passed after the other local checks finished. Independent read-only review found no blocking issues. No experiment code or published result changed.