[codex] Allow soak runner control egress#51
Draft
scttbnsn wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Root cause
The soak workflow moved from Harden Runner audit mode to block mode with an allowlist that covered checkout/setup traffic but not the long-lived GitHub Actions runner communication paths. The failed runs ended with runner communication loss before the soak script could finish or upload artifacts.
Validation
actionlint .github/workflows/quality-soak-weekly.ymlzizmor .github/workflows/quality-soak-weekly.ymlgit diff --check HEAD~1..HEADgolangci-lint run,go test ./...,govulncheck, fuzz smoke, actionlint, zizmor, clean-treeFollow-up
The real verification is rerunning
Quality: Soak; the failure only shows up during the long GitHub-hosted run.