Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -224,7 +224,20 @@
https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/40/Bosnia%20and%20Herzegovina/show
-->
<country iso="ba" allowed="true" />

<!-- Enable recording for Bangladesh:
Based on the Evidence Act of 1872, audio recordings may be admissible as a form of
evidence. In civil cases, call recording may be used, but judges decide on when they are
admissable. Recordings are considered admissible evidence when a witness is deposed and
testifies to their validity before a court. Parties may rely on recordings during civil
cases, in order to support their side's version of events. While the use of audio
recordings as a form of evidence is common, the Supreme Court has not stated whether
recordings can be used as evidence blindly, thus their use is on a case-to-case basis.
Legal discussion:
https://www.thedailystar.net/news/your-advocate-2
Evidence Act of 1872:
https://acc.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/acc.portal.gov.bd/law/7e753733_a368_471e_aef9_b4525cb5082c/The_Evidence_Act,_1872_(Act_No._I_of_1872).pdf
-->
<country iso="bd" allowed="true" />
<!-- Enable recording for Belgium:
As stated in the official response below, Belgian law does not consider the recording of
one's personal communications as a punishable offense. Using said recordings in a
Expand Down