Skip to content

[CI Visibility] Fix CODEOWNERS parser correctness and normalize CI source paths - #9099

Open
tonyredondo wants to merge 27 commits into
masterfrom
tony/ci-visibility-codeowners-parser-fixes
Open

[CI Visibility] Fix CODEOWNERS parser correctness and normalize CI source paths#9099
tonyredondo wants to merge 27 commits into
masterfrom
tony/ci-visibility-codeowners-parser-fixes

Conversation

@tonyredondo

@tonyredondo tonyredondo commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary of changes

  • Fix CODEOWNERS matching to follow GitHub and GitLab semantics.
  • Normalize compiler-recorded source paths so CI Visibility can resolve repository files and their owners.

Reason for change

CI Visibility uses CODEOWNERS metadata to determine test ownership. The existing parser diverged from GitHub and GitLab behavior in several cases, which could assign incorrect owners.

Additionally, source paths recorded by compilers in CI can contain agent-specific relative prefixes, causing valid repository files to fall outside the CODEOWNERS root during path resolution.

Implementation details

  • Separate GitHub and GitLab rule evaluation:
    • GitHub uses the last matching rule globally.
    • GitLab evaluates sections independently, supports default owners, and keeps exclusions scoped to their section.
  • Select the CODEOWNERS platform from repository hosts, CI provider metadata, or an unambiguous platform-specific CODEOWNERS location.
  • Correct matching for rooted and unrooted patterns, directory patterns, wildcards, globstars, comments, case sensitivity, and Windows path separators.
  • Use a deterministic matcher with bounded pattern size and match steps so pathological rules cannot block the instrumented process.
  • Anchor unresolved relative source paths using the longest existing suffix under the CODEOWNERS root.
  • Recognize Azure Pipelines checkout paths for both nested and repository-root source files.
  • Keep absolute paths outside the repository, URIs, bare filenames, and non-existent suffixes from being re-anchored.

Test coverage

  • Added specification-focused tests for GitHub and GitLab CODEOWNERS behavior.
  • Added tests against the CODEOWNERS file in this repository and real-world CODEOWNERS examples.
  • Added coverage for GitLab repositories running on non-GitLab CI providers, including public and self-managed hosts with HTTPS and SCP-style repository URLs.
  • Extended CI source-path fallback tests, including nested and repository-root Azure Pipelines compiler paths, foreign relative prefixes, URIs, and paths outside the repository.

Other details

No public API or dependency changes.

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (9099) and master.

⚠️ Potential regressions detected

HttpMessageHandler

Metric Master (Mean ± 95% CI) Current (Mean ± 95% CI) Change Status
.NET Framework 4.8 - Baseline
duration190.84 ± (190.82 - 191.58) ms203.23 ± (203.39 - 205.25) ms+6.5%❌⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - Bailout
duration194.57 ± (194.51 - 194.92) ms209.42 ± (211.85 - 214.21) ms+7.6%❌⬆️
.NET Framework 4.8 - CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
duration1155.56 ± (1158.39 - 1166.10) ms1239.72 ± (1238.42 - 1250.73) ms+7.3%❌⬆️

📄 View the full report (charts + all metrics) →

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-08-24 17:02:48

Comparing candidate commit 7d410b3 in PR branch tony/ci-visibility-codeowners-parser-fixes with baseline commit 75d1702 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 71 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 63 known flaky benchmarks, 63 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-5301.384op/s; -4532.062op/s] or [-6.052%; -5.174%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-8813.450op/s; -8343.529op/s] or [-10.450%; -9.893%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-10147.162op/s; -8875.671op/s] or [-10.317%; -9.025%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.605KB; +1.605KB] or [+48.760%; +48.776%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+312.783ms; +318.407ms] or [+155.214%; +158.005%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-63.522op/s; -57.652op/s] or [-11.429%; -10.373%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.014KB; +1.014KB] or [+37.603%; +37.615%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+380.016ms; +384.270ms] or [+300.236%; +303.597%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+70.068op/s; +73.615op/s] or [+9.238%; +9.706%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.089KB; +1.089KB] or [+40.380%; +40.393%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+403.090ms; +406.308ms] or [+356.720%; +359.567%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.725KB; +4.726KB] or [+99.482%; +99.497%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-61069.166op/s; -60688.376op/s] or [-47.515%; -47.219%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.848KB; +3.848KB] or [+81.379%; +81.391%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-61527.928op/s; -58263.827op/s] or [-44.912%; -42.529%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.576KB; +4.576KB] or [+98.954%; +98.966%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-49360.271op/s; -47098.882op/s] or [-44.627%; -42.583%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.348KB; +1.348KB] or [+109.063%; +109.078%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-287418.482op/s; -283826.850op/s] or [-29.347%; -28.980%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+511 bytes; +512 bytes] or [+41.822%; +41.834%]
  • unstable execution_time [-29.204ms; -2.633ms] or [-13.024%; -1.174%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-121088.412op/s; -73549.957op/s] or [-12.936%; -7.857%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.312KB; +1.312KB] or [+108.600%; +108.616%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-170497.099op/s; -154451.571op/s] or [-24.497%; -22.192%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72748.973op/s; -71912.427op/s] or [-48.959%; -48.396%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-73074.454op/s; -70188.952op/s] or [-46.496%; -44.660%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-56867.595op/s; -54244.738op/s] or [-45.302%; -43.213%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-17.911ms; -13.528ms] or [-8.256%; -6.236%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.757KB] or [-42.326%; -42.318%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.540ms; +301.594ms] or [+150.169%; +150.696%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+979.349op/s; +999.091op/s] or [+10.817%; +11.035%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.721ms; +302.840ms] or [+151.150%; +152.723%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2410.231op/s; +2622.688op/s] or [+18.435%; +20.060%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.846ms; +303.642ms] or [+151.543%; +152.951%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1923.389op/s; +2053.373op/s] or [+18.569%; +19.824%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+295.170ms; +296.377ms] or [+144.976%; +145.569%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+558.237op/s; +574.126op/s] or [+14.799%; +15.220%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.844ms; +301.225ms] or [+146.582%; +147.258%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2609.709op/s; +2668.302op/s] or [+37.914%; +38.765%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.344ms; +305.499ms] or [+152.111%; +152.688%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1322.969op/s; +1350.594op/s] or [+26.260%; +26.808%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-146.260µs; -141.776µs] or [-30.029%; -29.109%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+847.120op/s; +878.560op/s] or [+41.259%; +42.790%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-132.476µs; -101.463µs] or [-30.383%; -23.271%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+769.904op/s; +934.832op/s] or [+33.472%; +40.643%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-141.023µs; -118.925µs] or [-30.215%; -25.480%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+761.588op/s; +846.313op/s] or [+35.156%; +39.067%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-126.172µs; -121.940µs] or [-34.066%; -32.923%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1336.856op/s; +1385.142op/s] or [+49.511%; +51.299%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-101.786µs; -78.200µs] or [-32.495%; -24.965%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1171.876op/s; +1373.119op/s] or [+36.531%; +42.804%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-134.932µs; -112.536µs] or [-36.912%; -30.786%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1281.120op/s; +1418.205op/s] or [+45.974%; +50.894%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.598ms; +300.347ms] or [+149.530%; +149.904%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+407.626ms; +418.416ms] or [+442.903%; +454.627%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+779.870op/s; +979.614op/s] or [+6.408%; +8.050%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+199.910ms; +265.010ms] or [+151.789%; +201.220%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+274.842ms; +336.647ms] or [+126.370%; +154.787%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-526.373op/s; -478.398op/s] or [-47.695%; -43.348%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+203.531ms; +336.821ms] or [+86.736%; +143.539%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-672.543op/s; -589.078op/s] or [-44.859%; -39.292%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+333.202ms; +343.354ms] or [+199.294%; +205.366%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-383.697op/s; -347.595op/s] or [-26.716%; -24.203%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable throughput [+21.180op/s; +67.286op/s] or [+6.088%; +19.341%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+55.080op/s; +128.486op/s] or [+5.939%; +13.854%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.397ms; +302.024ms] or [+151.274%; +152.094%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.515ms; +302.793ms] or [+151.090%; +151.730%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.466ms; +302.798ms] or [+150.439%; +152.113%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.816ms; +305.221ms] or [+152.064%; +153.272%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.230ms; +302.011ms] or [+147.956%; +149.331%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.750ms; +308.781ms] or [+154.461%; +156.504%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.792ms; +300.456ms] or [+149.465%; +150.802%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.002ms; +303.334ms] or [+150.022%; +151.184%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+38212.180op/s; +44983.759op/s] or [+7.588%; +8.932%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.622ms; +302.566ms] or [+149.059%; +150.524%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.253ms; -12.612ms] or [-7.558%; -5.865%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+19049.350op/s; +26899.798op/s] or [+5.226%; +7.379%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+3.557µs; +47.282µs] or [+0.879%; +11.679%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.262KB; -19.239KB] or [-7.026%; -7.018%]
  • unstable execution_time [-47.115µs; +7.182µs] or [-9.312%; +1.419%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.418KB; -19.398KB] or [-7.079%; -7.072%]
  • unstable execution_time [-83.091µs; -21.874µs] or [-14.399%; -3.791%]
  • unstable throughput [+90.027op/s; +266.469op/s] or [+5.143%; +15.224%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+6.118µs; +10.853µs] or [+14.461%; +25.652%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-4816.150op/s; -2898.181op/s] or [-20.274%; -12.200%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-12.165µs; +2.691µs] or [-18.873%; +4.175%]
  • unstable throughput [+555.395op/s; +2739.833op/s] or [+3.408%; +16.810%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.366ms; +303.523ms] or [+152.833%; +153.418%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.509ms; +308.074ms] or [+154.994%; +156.809%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.002ms; +302.447ms] or [+150.188%; +151.412%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-21840.823op/s; -20515.225op/s] or [-6.046%; -5.679%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.224ms; +302.298ms] or [+149.635%; +150.668%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.116ms; +302.853ms] or [+151.206%; +152.078%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.930ms; +305.285ms] or [+153.627%; +154.821%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.386ms; +300.447ms] or [+149.335%; +149.865%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+60459053.091op/s; +60899007.230op/s] or [+44.030%; +44.350%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+426.484ms; +434.311ms] or [+530.408%; +540.143%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.792ms; +300.847ms] or [+149.529%; +150.056%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+74098.425op/s; +81549.779op/s] or [+6.918%; +7.614%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+66096.541op/s; +74747.629op/s] or [+6.564%; +7.424%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+49239.719op/s; +54141.083op/s] or [+8.941%; +9.831%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@tonyredondo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 29e64a5575

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Ci/CiEnvironment/CIEnvironmentValues.cs Outdated
Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Ci/CodeOwners.cs Outdated
Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Ci/CodeOwners.cs Outdated
@tonyredondo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: cc2938e198

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Ci/CiEnvironment/CIEnvironmentValues.cs Outdated
Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Ci/CiEnvironment/CIEnvironmentValues.cs Outdated
@tonyredondo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@codex review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7e563e5fab

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Ci/CiEnvironment/CIEnvironmentValues.cs Outdated
Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Ci/CodeOwners.cs Outdated
Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Ci/CodeOwners.cs Outdated
@tonyredondo
tonyredondo marked this pull request as ready for review August 24, 2026 14:21
@tonyredondo
tonyredondo requested review from a team as code owners August 24, 2026 14:21

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 371caaf49c

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Ci/CiEnvironment/CIEnvironmentValues.CodeOwners.cs Outdated
Comment thread tracer/src/Datadog.Trace/Ci/CodeOwners.cs Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant