Skip to content

Fix broken unit tests in GcMemoryLoadCalculatorTests - #9101

Merged
andrewlock merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
andrew/fix-container-metrics
Aug 24, 2026
Merged

Fix broken unit tests in GcMemoryLoadCalculatorTests#9101
andrewlock merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
andrew/fix-container-metrics

Conversation

@andrewlock

@andrewlock andrewlock commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary of changes

Fixes the new unit tests that only fail on master

Reason for change

The behaviour of Environment.SetEnvironmentVariable(.., "") is different on < .NET 9, which causes the new unit tests introduced in #9505 to break only on master, where we run .NET 7 and .NET 8. This fixes those tests

Implementation details

These tests cases don't work on < .NET 9, because they don't set a "" variable, they instead delete the variable:

[InlineData(PlatformKeys.DotNetGCHighMemPercent, "")]

In .NET 9+ these tests work, as they do set the variable with the "" value

Test coverage

Added a couple of extra cases just to cover other edge cases while I was there.
I'll make sure to do a full TFM run to be sure it's fixed

Other details

Currently causing failures on master (not PRs) so high urgency

@andrewlock andrewlock added the area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations) label Aug 24, 2026
@andrewlock
andrewlock requested a review from a team as a code owner August 24, 2026 08:41
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the area:tests unit tests, integration tests label Aug 24, 2026
NachoEchevarria
NachoEchevarria approved these changes Aug 24, 2026
View reviewed changes

@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@pr-commenter

pr-commenter Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2026-08-24 09:20:33

Comparing candidate commit 64626eb in PR branch andrew/fix-container-metrics with baseline commit e476ea7 in branch master.

📊 Benchmarking dashboard

Found 0 performance improvements and 1 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 70 metrics, 1 unstable metrics, 69 known flaky benchmarks, 57 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.

Explanation

This is an A/B test comparing a candidate commit's performance against that of a baseline commit. Performance changes are noted in the tables below as:

  • 🟩 = significantly better candidate vs. baseline
  • 🟥 = significantly worse candidate vs. baseline

We compute a confidence interval (CI) over the relative difference of means between metrics from the candidate and baseline commits, considering the baseline as the reference.

If the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD), the change is considered significant.

Feel free to reach out to #apm-benchmarking-platform on Slack if you have any questions.

More details about the CI and significant changes

You can imagine this CI as a range of values that is likely to contain the true difference of means between the candidate and baseline commits.

CIs of the difference of means are often centered around 0%, because often changes are not that big:

---------------------------------(------|---^--------)-------------------------------->
                              -0.6%    0%  0.3%     +1.2%
                                 |          |        |
         lower bound of the CI --'          |        |
sample mean (center of the CI) -------------'        |
         upper bound of the CI ----------------------'

As described above, a change is considered significant if the CI is entirely outside the configured SIGNIFICANT_IMPACT_THRESHOLD (or the deprecated UNCONFIDENCE_THRESHOLD).

For instance, for an execution time metric, this confidence interval indicates a significantly worse performance:

----------------------------------------|---------|---(---------^---------)---------->
                                       0%        1%  1.3%      2.2%      3.1%
                                                  |   |         |         |
       significant impact threshold --------------'   |         |         |
                      lower bound of CI --------------'         |         |
       sample mean (center of the CI) --------------------------'         |
                      upper bound of CI ----------------------------------'

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark.SendAsync net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-5515.275op/s; -5211.337op/s] or [-6.296%; -5.949%]

Unstable benchmarks

These benchmarks have a confidence interval too wide to call a change; treat them as noise rather than signal.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-24.271ms; -4.040ms] or [-12.352%; -2.056%]

Known flaky benchmarks

These benchmarks are marked as flaky and will not trigger a failure. Modify FLAKY_BENCHMARKS_REGEX to control which benchmarks are marked as flaky.

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-9466.249op/s; -8804.921op/s] or [-11.224%; -10.440%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 throughput [-10907.576op/s; -9486.976op/s] or [-11.091%; -9.646%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.541KB; +1.541KB] or [+46.817%; +46.831%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+311.775ms; +316.130ms] or [+154.714%; +156.875%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-61.707op/s; -56.426op/s] or [-11.102%; -10.152%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.011KB; +1.011KB] or [+37.485%; +37.498%]
  • unstable execution_time [+293.088ms; +354.307ms] or [+231.558%; +279.924%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+69.911op/s; +75.461op/s] or [+9.217%; +9.949%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.091KB; +1.091KB] or [+40.454%; +40.465%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+392.533ms; +400.302ms] or [+347.377%; +354.252%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.725KB; +4.726KB] or [+99.482%; +99.497%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-60934.062op/s; -60555.050op/s] or [-47.410%; -47.115%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.848KB; +3.848KB] or [+81.379%; +81.391%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-15.870ms; -11.706ms] or [-7.412%; -5.467%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-60076.373op/s; -57312.024op/s] or [-43.852%; -41.835%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+4.576KB; +4.576KB] or [+98.954%; +98.966%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-48971.585op/s; -46719.972op/s] or [-44.276%; -42.240%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.348KB; +1.348KB] or [+109.063%; +109.078%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-288376.799op/s; -284826.319op/s] or [-29.445%; -29.082%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+511 bytes; +512 bytes] or [+41.822%; +41.834%]
  • 🟩 execution_time [-26.224ms; -21.277ms] or [-11.695%; -9.489%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-102904.336op/s; -79001.378op/s] or [-10.993%; -8.440%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.AllCycleSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+1.312KB; +1.312KB] or [+108.600%; +108.616%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-172685.374op/s; -156055.495op/s] or [-24.812%; -22.422%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net472

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.378KB; +3.378KB] or [+89.003%; +89.017%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72618.467op/s; -71804.656op/s] or [-48.871%; -48.324%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody net6.0

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.336KB; +3.336KB] or [+88.150%; +88.161%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-72740.432op/s; -69859.699op/s] or [-46.284%; -44.451%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorMoreComplexBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 allocated_mem [+3.264KB; +3.264KB] or [+88.493%; +88.506%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-56381.056op/s; -53761.082op/s] or [-44.915%; -42.828%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+298104.557op/s; +330931.970op/s] or [+9.940%; +11.035%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-19.334ms; -14.985ms] or [-8.912%; -6.908%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net472

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.759KB; -13.756KB] or [-42.324%; -42.316%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.674ms; +300.535ms] or [+149.737%; +150.167%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+981.094op/s; +997.535op/s] or [+10.836%; +11.018%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.128ms; +303.245ms] or [+151.355%; +152.927%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2383.013op/s; +2598.841op/s] or [+18.226%; +19.877%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-13.722KB; -13.718KB] or [-42.341%; -42.329%]
  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.184ms; +302.591ms] or [+151.209%; +152.422%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1895.516op/s; +2020.458op/s] or [+18.300%; +19.507%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.075ms; +297.476ms] or [+145.420%; +146.108%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+547.613op/s; +567.420op/s] or [+14.517%; +15.042%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.595ms; +299.854ms] or [+145.483%; +146.588%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+2479.686op/s; +2575.772op/s] or [+36.025%; +37.421%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecEncoderBenchmark.EncodeLegacyArgs netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.730ms; +301.648ms] or [+150.304%; +150.763%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1431.734op/s; +1464.227op/s] or [+28.419%; +29.064%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-146.474µs; -142.598µs] or [-30.073%; -29.277%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+854.251op/s; +879.461op/s] or [+41.606%; +42.834%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-140.834µs; -114.205µs] or [-32.300%; -26.193%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+881.167op/s; +1002.778op/s] or [+38.310%; +43.597%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-141.954µs; -119.910µs] or [-30.414%; -25.691%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+770.383op/s; +854.081op/s] or [+35.562%; +39.426%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net472

  • 🟩 execution_time [-127.247µs; -122.781µs] or [-34.356%; -33.150%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1350.433op/s; +1404.151op/s] or [+50.014%; +52.003%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-103.431µs; -79.855µs] or [-33.020%; -25.494%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1205.302op/s; +1406.164op/s] or [+37.573%; +43.834%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecWafBenchmark.RunWafRealisticBenchmarkWithAttack netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 execution_time [-135.723µs; -113.313µs] or [-37.128%; -30.998%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+1294.386op/s; +1432.130op/s] or [+46.450%; +51.393%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.488ms; +300.216ms] or [+149.475%; +149.839%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+319.288ms; +390.763ms] or [+346.919%; +424.580%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+784.173op/s; +1048.542op/s] or [+6.444%; +8.616%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark.SendRequest netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [+245.014ms; +309.780ms] or [+186.036%; +235.213%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472

  • unstable execution_time [+367.130ms; +431.348ms] or [+168.803%; +198.330%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-589.936op/s; -536.308op/s] or [-53.454%; -48.595%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+212.656ms; +345.863ms] or [+90.625%; +147.392%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-675.561op/s; -591.841op/s] or [-45.060%; -39.476%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark.WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+360.713ms; +370.746ms] or [+215.748%; +221.749%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-426.989op/s; -390.577op/s] or [-29.731%; -27.195%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+281.874µs; +319.789µs] or [+14.185%; +16.093%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-69.408op/s; -62.181op/s] or [-13.792%; -12.356%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable throughput [+20.032op/s; +58.556op/s] or [+5.758%; +16.832%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+259.435µs; +276.886µs] or [+10.134%; +10.815%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-38.091op/s; -35.898op/s] or [-9.752%; -9.190%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-157.708µs; -102.221µs] or [-7.989%; -5.178%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+29.865op/s; +44.285op/s] or [+5.896%; +8.742%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.813ms; +304.411ms] or [+152.491%; +153.296%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.063ms; +299.777ms] or [+148.859%; +150.219%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.420ms; +306.089ms] or [+151.923%; +153.766%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.940ms; +303.492ms] or [+151.624%; +152.404%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+296.170ms; +298.106ms] or [+146.443%; +147.400%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark.CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+304.418ms; +309.108ms] or [+154.292%; +156.669%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.278ms; +301.590ms] or [+150.210%; +151.371%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.458ms; +300.542ms] or [+148.256%; +149.793%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+32485.302op/s; +39598.162op/s] or [+6.451%; +7.863%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark.ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.456ms; +301.690ms] or [+148.479%; +150.088%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟩 execution_time [-16.634ms; -12.969ms] or [-7.735%; -6.031%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+19778.809op/s; +26439.120op/s] or [+5.426%; +7.253%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net472

  • unstable execution_time [+9.932µs; +53.223µs] or [+2.453%; +13.146%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark net6.0

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-19.473KB; -19.451KB] or [-7.103%; -7.095%]
  • unstable execution_time [-20.480µs; +36.167µs] or [-4.048%; +7.148%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatAspectBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 allocated_mem [-16.462KB; -16.442KB] or [-6.001%; -5.994%]
  • unstable execution_time [-61.121µs; +2.324µs] or [-10.592%; +0.403%]
  • unstable throughput [+11.025op/s; +188.867op/s] or [+0.630%; +10.790%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+16.633µs; +22.854µs] or [+39.315%; +54.020%]
  • 🟥 throughput [-8338.861op/s; -6210.343op/s] or [-35.104%; -26.144%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark netcoreapp3.1

  • unstable execution_time [-11.989µs; -3.653µs] or [-18.601%; -5.667%]
  • unstable throughput [+828.485op/s; +2652.718op/s] or [+5.083%; +16.275%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.006ms; +303.654ms] or [+152.651%; +153.483%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.892ms; +304.599ms] or [+153.662%; +155.040%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+301.796ms; +304.113ms] or [+151.086%; +152.246%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net472

  • 🟥 throughput [-23323.990op/s; -20531.441op/s] or [-6.457%; -5.684%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+37693.829op/s; +40837.854op/s] or [+7.135%; +7.730%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+297.426ms; +300.050ms] or [+148.240%; +149.548%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog net6.0

  • 🟥 execution_time [+300.600ms; +302.382ms] or [+150.947%; +151.842%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+302.429ms; +306.700ms] or [+153.372%; +155.539%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net472

  • 🟥 execution_time [+299.454ms; +300.345ms] or [+149.369%; +149.814%]
  • 🟩 throughput [+61147090.866op/s; +61492113.325op/s] or [+44.531%; +44.782%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore net6.0

  • unstable execution_time [+343.227ms; +399.020ms] or [+426.864%; +496.253%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SingleSpanAspNetCoreBenchmark.SingleSpanAspNetCore netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟥 execution_time [+298.988ms; +300.031ms] or [+149.128%; +149.649%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+89288.781op/s; +99646.327op/s] or [+8.337%; +9.304%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+64833.403op/s; +96696.280op/s] or [+5.018%; +7.484%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1

  • 🟩 throughput [+64514.581op/s; +75351.713op/s] or [+6.407%; +7.484%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+52021.931op/s; +57244.515op/s] or [+9.446%; +10.395%]

scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net6.0

  • 🟩 throughput [+55338.087op/s; +73945.955op/s] or [+6.183%; +8.262%]

Known flaky benchmarks without significant changes:

  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_AddEvent_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_GetContext_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_RecordException_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetAttributes_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_SetStatus_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.OpenTelemetry.InstrumentedApi.Trace.TelemetrySpanBenchmark.StartSpan_UpdateName_Sampled netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark.StartStopWithChild net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Asm.AppSecBodyBenchmark.ObjectExtractorSimpleBody net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSlice net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool net6.0
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OptimizedCharSliceWithPool netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.CharSliceBenchmark.OriginalCharSlice netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark.EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.Iast.StringAspectsBenchmark.StringConcatBenchmark net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark.SendReceive netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishSpan net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark.StartFinishTwoScopes netcoreapp3.1
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin net472
  • scenario:Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark.RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1

@dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot

dd-trace-dotnet-ci-bot Bot commented Aug 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (9101) and master.

✅ No regressions detected

📄 View the full report (charts + all metrics) →

@andrewlock
andrewlock enabled auto-merge (squash) August 24, 2026 11:10
@andrewlock
andrewlock merged commit 9db199a into master Aug 24, 2026
149 checks passed
@andrewlock
andrewlock deleted the andrew/fix-container-metrics branch August 24, 2026 14:29
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Aug 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@bouwkast bouwkast bouwkast approved these changes
@NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria NachoEchevarria approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

area:runtime-metrics area:tests unit tests, integration tests area:tracer The core tracer library (Datadog.Trace, does not include OpenTracing, native code, or integrations) runtime:netcore .NET Core

Projects

None yet

Milestone

vNext-v3

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@andrewlock @bouwkast @NachoEchevarria