Add enhanced implementations of construct() function, to allow bypass validation…#209
Draft
arthurvd wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Add enhanced implementations of construct() function, to allow bypass validation…#209arthurvd wants to merge 1 commit into
arthurvd wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…ing validation of nested BaseModel input files. I'm not too happy yet with how much custom code is required to bypass validation, but this is still in line with the recommendations typically found online.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #207. Not too happy yet about the fact that this is not built-in supported in Pydantic itself. Feels like a lot of custom code needed in our own BaseModel. Therefore, only a DRAFT PR, to hear your first ideas.