Skip to content

Conversation

@EpitomeZied
Copy link
Owner

@EpitomeZied EpitomeZied commented Dec 19, 2025

Summary

  • list all remaining study plan problems with placeholder entries
  • mark unsolved items with Null in the Solution column while retaining existing links
  • keep progress stats and getting-started instructions intact

Testing

  • not run (documentation-only changes)

Codex Task

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated command documentation with improved execution instructions and clearer file path references
    • Reorganized problem catalog entries and updated reference links for enhanced navigation
    • Enhanced table formatting with adjusted column widths across sections for improved readability
    • Refreshed progress tracking statistics with updated completion metrics

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@continue
Copy link

continue bot commented Dec 19, 2025

All Green - Keep your PRs mergeable

Learn more

All Green is an AI agent that automatically:

✅ Addresses code review comments

✅ Fixes failing CI checks

✅ Resolves merge conflicts


Unsubscribe from All Green comments

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Walkthrough

README.md was updated to reflect changes in the problem set and code organization. Command examples, table widths, problem links, and file paths were revised. Progress statistics were updated: Easy problems reduced from 20 to 11, Medium from 10 to 0, and completion rate changed to 37%.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Update
README.md
Updated run command to reference "01 Closures" hello-world function file with quoted path; adjusted Solution column width from 100 to 140; replaced LeetCode problem links and updated Code file paths with URL-encoded spaces; reorganized problem entries with label changes and null/new file mappings; changed section emoji heading; updated progress statistics (Easy: 20→11, Medium: 10→0, Completion: 0%→37%)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

  • Attention areas:
    • Verify all updated file paths and links are correctly formatted and functional
    • Confirm progress statistics (Easy count, Medium count, completion percentage) align with the actual problem set changes
    • Cross-check that problem reorganizations and label updates are consistent throughout the document
    • Validate URL encoding in file path references

Poem

🐰 A rabbit hops through tables wide,
Updating links from far and wide,
Statistics shift, the progress gleams—
From zero to thirty-seven dreams!
With paths renewed and headers bright,
The README shines, oh what a sight! 🌟

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'Add placeholders for remaining study plan problems' accurately describes the main change: adding placeholder entries (marked with Null) for unsolved study plan problems in the README.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/update-readme-file-m3ji82

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between da53171 and ef38253.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (7 hunks)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants