The README a stranger reads, and the wiki that holds the rest [#333] - #347
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The README was written for somebody working in the tree. It pasted grep output, argued the version scheme, quoted a workflow run and its log, and a stranger who wanted to know what the plugin is, whether it is for them and how to install it read 180 lines to find one address. Two of its statements had also gone false, because a paste goes stale the moment the tree moves: it said the page a user opens about their own numbers was not built while the routes behind it exist, and its pasted action list named eight of the ten actions on the tree. What replaces it is eight sections that link out rather than explain: what it is, what it is not, installing, configuration, documentation, privacy and security, contributing, licence. No command output is pasted, so there is nothing left in this file that can go stale against the tree without a reader noticing. The catalogue address and the two server lines are stated where a person installing it looks, and the sentence about the leading number saying which line a release is for stays, because that is the misreading the numbering invites. Who sees what is the rule of #329, in the same words: a signed-in account sees its own figures and nobody else's, the server-wide reports name nobody, and the one place an account is named is the server's year in review where that account recorded its own agreement. Nothing here promises a page the installed version shows, and the views are named as coming with 0.2.0.0 rather than described as present. The rest moved to the wiki, ten pages with a sidebar, pushed separately because a wiki is its own repository. The tracked documents under docs/ stay where they are, because the suite reads them, and every wiki page that summarises one links to it and says it is the one to trust on a number. The em dash is absent, as #340 asked of the tree, and so is every other non-ASCII character: the tracked markdown on master carried two bytes above ASCII before this change and carries the same two after it. Signed-off-by: Nils Lehnen <30603423+iderex@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #333. Stage 4 of 9 on #329.
This replaces #346, whose single commit carried no
Signed-off-bytrailer andreddened the DCO gate. The content is identical; the branch is a new name rather
than a rewrite of the old one, and #346 is closed with that reason in its body.
Scope: README.md, and this repository's wiki.
img/is unchanged: the logo italready holds is what the new header shows, and nothing else was needed.
What was wrong
The README was written for somebody working in the tree. It pasted grep output,
argued the version scheme, and quoted a workflow run and its log. A stranger who
wanted to know what the plugin is, whether it is for them, and how to install it
read 180 lines to find one address.
Two of its statements had gone false, because a paste goes stale the moment the
tree moves. It said the page a user opens about their own numbers was not built
while the routes behind it exist, and its pasted action list named eight of the
ten actions on the tree:
The wiki held one page, the welcome text.
What this changes
README.md, 168 lines in place of 180, eight sections that link out rather
than explain: what it is, what it is not, installing, configuration,
documentation, privacy and security, contributing, licence. Above them a note
block naming Flowfin, the status rung and where installing is described, a
centred title with the logo out of
img/, and six badges: licence, the latestrelease of each version stream, build status, documentation, OpenSSF Scorecard.
No command output is pasted anywhere in it, so nothing is left in this file that
can go stale against the tree without a reader noticing.
Who sees what is the rule of #329 in the same words: a signed-in account sees
its own figures and nobody else's, no route hands one account another account's
rows, an administrator is refused there like anybody else, the server-wide
reports name nobody, and the one place an account is named is the server's year
in review where that account recorded its own agreement.
Nothing in it promises a page the installed version shows. It states that no
statistics page is drawn in the dashboard today, says why in two sentences, and
names the views as arriving with 0.2.0.0 under #335, #336 and #337.
The wiki, ten pages and a sidebar, pushed separately because a wiki is its
own repository:
Home carries what the plugin is, the status rung and the page list. Installation
carries the address, the catalogue, the restart, the two lines and their version
streams, upgrading, uninstalling and what removal deletes. Pages describes every
view, the states each one tells apart and where it is found. Configuration puts
the eight settings in a reader's words, both retention windows, and which of the
two deletions is terminal. What is stored and who can read it carries the
tables, the readers and the absences. Privacy, consent and deletion quotes the
wording in full and separates what agreeing changes from what it does not.
Transcode reasons says why the reason counts exceed the plays. Support matrix
and releases carries the two lines, the floors, the streams, the release assets
and
gh attestation verify. Troubleshooting carries the three settings-pagesentences, the refused save, and every line this plugin writes to the server log
with its level. Release process is for whoever cuts a release.
Every page that summarises a tracked document links to it and says the document
is the one to trust on a number, because the suite reads those and reads nothing
on the wiki. The tracked documents under
docs/are untouched.Pages is marked as coming at the top and at each view, because the installed
version declares its settings page and nothing else.
Done when, against the tree
The README fits in one screen of headings, carries no pasted command output,
and states the catalogue address and the two server lines.
The two fenced blocks are the catalogue address and the build commands. Neither
is output.
Every link in it resolves, checked with a link walker whose output is pasted.
The walker takes every markdown link and every
hrefandsrcin the file,deduplicates them, and reports an HTTP status for a remote one,
filefor a paththat exists in the tree, and
anchorfor a heading in the file itself:Run at this branch's head, after the wiki was pushed:
37 links, no
MISSINGline. What that walker cannot see is a link inside prosewritten without markdown syntax, and there is none in the file.
The two release badges answer rather than erroring, which is the check worth
making on a filtered badge:
no matching releases foundis the true answer for the 12.0 stream and is whatthe badge should say until that line publishes.
Every wiki page above exists with the content listed, the sidebar links them,
and each page that summarises a tracked document links to it. Every page
answered over HTTP after the push:
Nothing in either promises a page the installed version does not show. The
declared set is one page, and that is what the README and the Pages wiki page
both say:
The README says the same thing about who sees what as the rule on #329.
That paragraph is quoted above and is in
## What it is.The means
Markdown in the repository and on the wiki, which is what a README and a wiki
page are made of here and what every reader of them already has. Nothing is
added: no generator, no runtime, no dependency, and the link walker is a shell
pipeline in this body rather than a tool in the tree, so the change adds no file
to maintain. What it cannot carry is a refusable property, which is why the
reading below is stated as a reading.
What this does not do
Nothing checks any of it. No test reads
README.mdand no route reads a wikipage, so the link walk above is a reading taken at this head and not a gate: a
link that rots tomorrow turns nothing red. The wiki is outside every check this
repository runs, by construction, which is why each page there says the tracked
document is the one to trust on a number.
The status rung in the note block is a judgement, not a measurement. Nothing in
the tree declares a rung, and
In-Developmentis my reading of a plugin with onerelease, a store that will not open on the floor server of its line, and no
statistics page shown anywhere.
img/is untouched. The banner-shaped header image the sibling boards carrydoes not exist here, so the header shows the logo the repository already has.
Checks
Run on this machine at this head. Neither the suite nor the invariants read
README.md, so both are evidence that nothing else moved rather than evidenceabout the change:
The last one is #340's condition, still met: this file writes no em dash, and no
character above ASCII at all.
This change has had no second reader. The repository's checks on this pull
request are what stands in front of the merge, and a person has read nothing.