data(soc): GPU + process_nm enrichment for well-known chips

[Seungpyo1007]

SoC spec enrichment for well-known chips (GPU + process_nm)

Two additive quality fixes to core SoC data referenced by thousands of phone records. Textbook-certain values, exact-slug matched; no fabrication and no real values overwritten (only placeholders / clearly-wrong heuristic defaults).

1. Filled documented GPU for 34 chips

Replaced Unknown mobile GPU / N/A placeholders with the real GPU:

• Qualcomm: Snapdragon S1/S2 (Adreno 200/205), 210/400/410/412 (Adreno 304/305/306), 415/615/616 (Adreno 405), 650 (Adreno 510), 800 (Adreno 330), 810 (Adreno 430), 820/821 (Adreno 530)
• Samsung Exynos: 5430 (Mali-T628 MP6), 7420 (Mali-T760 MP8), 7580 (Mali-T720 MP2), 8890 (Mali-T880 MP12)
• HiSilicon Kirin: 650 (Mali-T830 MP2), 950 (Mali-T880 MP4), 960 (Mali-G71 MP8)
• MediaTek Helio: X10 (PowerVR G6200), X20/X25 (Mali-T880 MP4)
• Apple: A8 (PowerVR GX6450), A9 (PowerVR GT7600), A10X (12-core), A11 variant (3-core)

2. Corrected clearly-wrong process_nm for 14 chips

Fixed heuristic 28nm defaults to the real node: Snapdragon 820/821 (14nm), 810 (20nm); Exynos 8890/7420 (14nm), 5430 (20nm); Kirin 650/950 (16nm); Helio X20/X25 (20nm); Apple A8 (20nm), A9 (14/16nm).

Validation

• python -m app.validate ✅ · integrity_check --strict ✅ · git diff --check clean
• Dump (site/public/v1/socs) refreshed to match.

Refs #1

[TechEngineBot]

TechEngine change review: PASS

• PR: data(soc): GPU + process_nm enrichment for well-known chips #48
• Ref: data/soc-gpu
• Commit: b55f7bd
• Requested by: @Seungpyo1007
• Run: https://github.com/GetTechAPI/TechEngine/actions/runs/27917057883

Check	Result
python -m app.validate	PASS
python integrity_check.py TechAPI/data --strict	PASS

Changed data

Category	Added	Modified	Deleted	Added verified	Added unverified	Added Kaggle-sourced
brand	0	0	0	0	0	0
soc	0	0	0	0	0	0
smartphone	0	0	0	0	0	0
tablet	0	0	0	0	0	0
watch	0	0	0	0	0	0
pda	0	0	0	0	0	0
gpu	0	0	0	0	0	0
cpu	0	0	0	0	0	0

Changed record examples

• No data file changes detected.

Heuristic review

• Heuristic warnings: none found.

[TechEngineBot]

TechEngine validation stats: PASS

• PR: data(soc): GPU + process_nm enrichment for well-known chips #48
• Ref: data/soc-gpu
• Commit: b55f7bd
• Run: https://github.com/GetTechAPI/TechEngine/actions/runs/27917057883

Data summary

Category	Total	Verified	Unverified	Missing verified	Tracked	Verified % of tracked
brand	189	0	189	0	189	0.0%
soc	2104	58	2046	0	2104	2.8%
smartphone	90118	184	89934	0	90118	0.2%
tablet	3048	0	3048	0	3048	0.0%
watch	378	0	378	0	378	0.0%
pda	110	0	110	0	110	0.0%
gpu	2030	0	2030	0	2030	0.0%
cpu	3977	976	3001	0	3977	24.5%
all	101954	1218	100736	0	101954	1.2%

Warning

Tracked verified coverage is below 50% for brand 0.0% (0/189), tablet 0.0% (0/3048), watch 0.0% (0/378), pda 0.0% (0/110), gpu 0.0% (0/2030), smartphone 0.2% (184/90118), all 1.2% (1218/101954), soc 2.8% (58/2104), and 1 more.
Tracked coverage excludes records missing the verified field; see the Missing verified column for those records.
This does not fail validation. Keep imported records verified: false until manual audit, but treat this as follow-up verification work before relying on the affected categories as curated data.

Validation notes

• Full advisory outlier listings are suppressed on successful runs because they are dataset-wide and mostly stable between PRs.
• Failure runs still include a detailed log excerpt for debugging.

Key output:

## app.validate
## integrity_check.py --strict
loaded CPU=3977 GPU=2030
✅ integrity gate: no hard anomalies.

Integrity section	Flagged lines
structural	0
CPU name/tier consistency (desktop mainstream only)	0
CPU single>multi (cinebench/geekbench — should be multi>=single)	0
CPU era-vs-score outliers	8
CPU cross-source ratio outliers (possible wrong-variant)	152
GPU cross-source ratio outliers + sanity	18