chore: relicense from Apache-2.0 to MIT - #48
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The org standardised on MIT as its single license. Replaced the license text, the two README mentions and the pull request template checklist. debian/copyright already claimed MIT while LICENSE said Apache-2.0 — the two now agree, and the full MIT text is inline because MIT is not under /usr/share/common-licenses the way Apache-2.0 is. Signed-off-by: Jaro-c <75870284+Jaro-c@users.noreply.github.com>
Jaro-c
added
type:chore
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The org standardised on MIT as its single license, so unitpm moves off Apache-2.0 as part of the org-wide migration.
LICENSE— canonical MIT text,Copyright (c) 2026 Glyndor.README.md— the header line and the License section. Dropped the "Patent grant included" claim with it: MIT carries no patent grant, and leaving that sentence next to an MIT license would be wrong..github/pull_request_template.md— the license alignment checklist.debian/copyright— it already claimed MIT whileLICENSEsaid Apache-2.0; the two now agree, and the full MIT text is inline because MIT is not under/usr/share/common-licenses.Left alone on purpose: the historical
debian/changelogentries that describe the earlier license change (history, not a claim about the current license) and the third-party license metadata inscripts/bench/pm2/package-lock.json.Still stale in
debian/copyrightand worth a separate pass:Upstream-Name: lynxpmandSource: https://github.com/Jaro-c/Lynx— both predate the rename.