Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

15 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Financial Performance Analysis

End-to-end financial analytics capstone project — turning two years of raw transaction, budget, headcount, customer, and vendor data into a validated, decision-ready analysis and an interactive executive dashboard.

Author: Gopal Sarkar


Business Problem

Leadership needed a clear, current view of financial health: whether revenue and costs are on track, where budgets are slipping, and who the most valuable customers and costliest vendors are. This project answers those questions using 10,400 transactions across 5 linked datasets spanning January 2022 – December 2023.

Tools & Methodology

Tool Used for
Excel Data validation — missing-value, duplicate, and category checks
MySQL Relational schema design, PK/FK integrity, data loading
Python (pandas) KPI calculation, EDA, budget variance analysis, outlier detection
SciPy Statistical hypothesis testing (ANOVA, t-test, chi-square)
Matplotlib / Seaborn Distribution, trend, and variance visualizations
Power BI 4-page interactive executive dashboard

Data Validation

10,400 transactions validated across 5 relational tables — 0 duplicate primary keys, 0 orphaned foreign keys, 0 unexpected missing values. The only "missing" values found (customer_id blank on Expense rows, vendor_id blank on Revenue rows) were confirmed as a structural pattern by design, not a data defect — an expense has no paying customer, a sale has no vendor.

Key Findings

KPI Value
Total Revenue $864.6M
Total Expense $167.7M
Net Profit $696.9M
Gross Margin 80.6%
Revenue vs. Budget +536.6%
Expense vs. Budget +60.9%

Statistical testing (95% confidence level) found no statistically significant variance across business units, regions, or customer segments:

Test Hypothesis Result
ANOVA Expense differs across business units F = 0.235, p = 0.791 — not significant
t-test Revenue differs between regions (East vs. West) t = 0.746, p = 0.456 — not significant
Chi-square Customer segment is associated with purchase category χ² = 2.206, df = 4, p = 0.698 — not significant

Performance is genuinely consistent company-wide — it isn't being propped up by one outlier unit, region, or segment. The real story is the gap between budgeted and actual figures, not an underperforming part of the business.

Customer & vendor concentration:

  • Top 10 customers = 4.44% of total revenue across 400 active accounts (low concentration risk)
  • Top 10 vendors = 15.23% of total expense across 120 active vendors (worth monitoring)

Dashboard Preview

Executive Overview Executive Overview

Budget vs. Actual Budget vs Actual

Customer & Vendor Analysis Customer & Vendor Analysis

Headcount & Cost Headcount & Cost

Exploratory Analysis (Python)

Revenue Distribution Expense Distribution
Expense by Business Unit Expense by Category

Revenue vs Expense Trend

Recommendations

  1. Rebuild the budgeting baseline using 2022–2023 actuals, not the original conservative targets, as the starting point for next year's budget.
  2. Maintain the current operating structure — hypothesis testing found no statistically significant variance by unit, region, or segment, so no structural reallocation is currently justified.
  3. Reduce vendor concentration risk by diversifying or renegotiating terms with the top 10 vendors representing 15.23% of spend.
  4. Formalize the data-validation process — turn the PK/FK, category, and range checks used here into a recurring monthly routine.

Future Scope

  • Predictive forecasting (regression/time-series) as more periods accumulate
  • Live Power BI refresh directly against MySQL instead of static CSV snapshots
  • Interaction-effect testing (region × business unit)
  • Automated anomaly alerts on outlier transactions
  • Entity-level profitability beyond aggregate top-10 concentration

Repository Structure

Financial-Performance-Analysis/
├── README.md
├── SQL/
│   └── create_tables_and_load.sql
├── Raw_Data/
│   ├── Customers.csv
│   ├── Vendors.csv
│   ├── Headcount.csv
│   ├── Budget.csv
│   └── Financial_Transactions.csv
├── Excel_Validated_Data/
│   ├── Customers_validated.xlsx
│   ├── Vendors_validated.xlsx
│   ├── Headcount_validated.xlsx
│   ├── Budget_validated.xlsx
│   └── Financial_Transactions_validated.xlsx
├── Python_Notebook/
│   └── financial_analysis.ipynb
├── PowerBI/
│   └── Financial_Performance_Dashboard.pbix
├── Images/
│   ├── dashboard-01-executive-overview.png
│   ├── dashboard-02-budget-vs-actual.png
│   ├── dashboard-03-customer-vendor.png
│   ├── dashboard-04-headcount-cost.png
│   ├── python-01-revenue-distribution.png
│   ├── python-02-expense-distribution.png
│   ├── python-03-expense-by-business-unit.png
│   ├── python-04-expense-by-category.png
│   └── python-05-revenue-expense-trend.png
├── Report/
│   └── Executive_Summary.docx
└── Presentation/
    └── Financial_Performance_Analysis.pptx

Data Dictionary

Table Description
customers Customer master data (name, segment, join date, region, status)
vendors Vendor master data (name, category, region, active status)
headcount Employee master data (name, business unit, join date, status, region, CTC)
budget Budget allocations by year, month, business unit
financial_transactions All financial transactions (date, amount, type, category, business unit, region)

About

Analyzed 10,400+ financial transactions across 5 relational tables to surface budget variance, cost drivers, and customer/vendor concentration — full pipeline from Excel validation through MySQL, Python (pandas/SciPy), and an interactive Power BI dashboard.

Topics

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages