Skip to content

feat(platform): add ID-DET-001 status visibility#27

Merged
raylee-hawkins merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
feature/id-det-001-platform-status
May 20, 2026
Merged

feat(platform): add ID-DET-001 status visibility#27
raylee-hawkins merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
feature/id-det-001-platform-status

Conversation

@raylee-hawkins
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@raylee-hawkins raylee-hawkins commented May 20, 2026

Summary

Adds platform status/plan visibility for ID-DET-001 and exposes the future gated integration roadmap without claiming those future phases in this PR.

Current scope

This PR establishes controlled-test validation/status support for ID-DET-001 only.

It updates the platform controller, controller documentation, and schema for bounded status/plan visibility.

Future gated phases

Live IdP log review, Wazuh/Splunk private receipt, Proxmox runtime identity evidence, AI-agent tool-scope telemetry, Cribl/Security Onion route checks, and production-grade identity coverage require separate gated phases.

Planned gates:

  • ID-RUNTIME-001: Proxmox and Windows private runtime identity receipt.
  • ID-CLOUD-001: IdP export/log review lane.
  • ID-AGENT-001: AI or machine identity tool-scope validation lane.
  • ID-ROUTE-001: SIEM/NDR route receipt lane.

Supported claim

ID-DET-001 has platform status/plan visibility for controlled-test validation only.

Not claimed here

This PR does not claim live IdP proof, live SIEM/NDR observation, production identity coverage, complete identity-attack coverage, autonomous SOC operation, disposition authority, proof promotion, public-safe status, or website/public-surface publication.

Validation

  • Platform status command passes for ID-DET-001.
  • Platform plan command passes for ID-DET-001.
  • Platform all-detections plan command passes.
  • Claim ceiling: CONTROLLED_TEST_VALIDATED.
  • Public-safe status: NOT_PUBLIC_SAFE.

Boundary

No runtime ledger behavior. No proof dependency. No public-safe promotion. No runtime action. No website touch. Depends on validation PR HawkinsOperations/hawkinsoperations-validation#45 and detections PR HawkinsOperations/hawkinsoperations-detections#25.

@raylee-hawkins
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Governance review for ID-DET-001 platform scope.

Reviewed scope: platform status/plan visibility only for ID-DET-001 through the existing controller, docs, and schema enum.

Supported claim: ID-DET-001 has platform status/plan visibility for controlled-test validation only.

Blocked claims preserved: no runtime-active claim, no signal-observed claim, no public-safe claim, no evidence-linked public proof, no live Okta/Entra/IdP proof, no live Splunk/Wazuh/Security Onion/Cribl proof, no production identity coverage claim, no full identity attack coverage claim, no impossible-travel completeness claim, no session hijacking completeness claim, no autonomous SOC claim, no AI-approved disposition, no analyst-approved disposition, no proof promotion, and no website/public-surface promotion.

No proof/public-safe/runtime/signal promotion. No runtime systems touched. No website or proof touched. No runtime ledger behavior added.

Merge only after checks and dependency order pass.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8ce59b51a4

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread scripts/ho_factory.py
@raylee-hawkins raylee-hawkins merged commit 490755e into main May 20, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant