Correct maximin profiled Gaussian score diagnostics - #14
Draft
FlorianPfaff wants to merge 20 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope
Corrects the v0.7 maximin planning diagnostic to match the candidate-specific residual variances used by held-out recovery.
0.5 * log1p(a^2 R / sigma^2);R;R_{k|l} = min_{b,c} E_w[(x_k - b - c x_l)^2]: for a nonconstant alternative,R=0exactly when the generator is affine in that alternative on the positive-weight support; constant-alternative and constant-generator cases are handled explicitly;Recovery rates and allocation evidence must be regenerated on the prespecified five seeds before manuscript import. The planning gap is a matched-candidate population target; it does not itself establish open-set/mixture robustness or quantify finite-training plug-in score uncertainty.