Preserve nonlinear axial-gauge query laws beyond matched covariance - #343
Open
FlorianPfaff wants to merge 6 commits into
Open
Preserve nonlinear axial-gauge query laws beyond matched covariance#343FlorianPfaff wants to merge 6 commits into
FlorianPfaff wants to merge 6 commits into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scientific purpose
Extend the observable-subspace factor and query-observability work (#332, #338) with a decision-relevant nonlinear mechanism: retaining the unobserved angular distribution, rather than only its tangent variance or even its exact Cartesian mean/covariance.
A uniform rotation and a threefold rotation law have identical first two Cartesian moments but give halfspace probabilities 1/2 and 1/3. Under the threefold law, collapsing both to probability 1/2 adds 1/36 expected Brier loss. Thus covariance repair alone cannot resolve this failure.
Implementation
AxialGaugeOrbit: explicit reference-frame rotation orbit with strict exact-line geometry checks and rigid-frame equivariance.CircularQuadrature: preserves a caller-supplied conditional angular law, not an assumed uniform prior.Source-frozen controlled experiment, completed locally
Scientific source revision:
f9f63b9fbecb9a91b61ec532157c8405b368eeb5.Protocol SHA-256:
ce26865227378b548548e20d513843b978aab0003279a117a02e29f2eb4cf06d.Five predefined regimes, two seeds, 16,384 independent continuous gauge/readout draws per seed and regime (163,840 total). Truth is not sampled from the prediction grid. The primary comparator has the same exact nonlinear mean and covariance as the orbit mixture.
NLL is in nats for Cartesian densities expressed in millimeters; lower is better. In the smooth threefold regime, the fixed halfspace Brier score changes from 0.250000 to 0.223182 (10.73% improvement). Decision gains are not universal: the uniform halfspace score is exactly tied, and the broad-regime Brier interval crosses zero. Point RMSE is identical for the two primary arms.
512-to-1024-node log-density refinement differs by at most 3.56e-15 nats on the fixed refinement observations. This is a numerical check, not a universal quadrature bound.
Finalized evidence bytes and interpretation are being retained separately in the private paper repository; this PR does not alter public scientific claim status.
Validation
Claim and novelty boundary
This is conditional controlled mechanism evidence with known angular laws and readout noise, not an end-to-end gauge estimator, real-provider competence/calibration, BayesianPhysTwin/Causal4D benefit, or deployment safety. Geometry-only rank deficiency is not proof of full likelihood symmetry. The module does not assume independence between observable geometry and unobserved angle; a complete uncertain-geometry belief must preserve and mix the appropriate conditional laws.
Circular moments, non-Gaussian rotation models, symmetry-aware inference, and Bayesian conditioning are established. The candidate contribution is their specific connection to deficient learned-window gauges and query-level loss that remains after exact moment matching. Documentation cites primary prior work and distinguishes this method from the existing general quotient-lifting manuscript.
No PointWorld, Flat'n'Fold, MotionCrafter, Deform360, BayesianPhysTwin, Causal4D, or protected target outcome was opened. The separate source-qualification route in #333 remains unchanged.