Add finite-orbit decision certificates beyond local gauge observability - #347
Add finite-orbit decision certificates beyond local gauge observability#347FlorianPfaff wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
Paper-side companion is now open: FlorianPfaff/BayesianPhysTwin-Paper#120. It retains the derivation, candidate manuscript wording, complete constructed-study JSON, and source/result hashes without changing existing claims or target-access rules. Validation update for final head
The local retained result SHA-256 is Both PRs remain unmerged. These checks establish implementation and constructed-mechanism evidence, not real-provider competence, BPT physical benefit, Causal4D validity, or deployment safety. |
Scientific purpose
Extend the local query-observability work in #338 with a finite-angle, shared-dependence certificate. No existing estimator, facade, frozen evidence, source protocol, or target authorization is changed.
For exact labeled collinear overlap, rotation about the overlap line remains unresolved. The scalar query
q(theta)=cos(theta)has zero local derivative at the identity despite a full range[-1,1]. Under the analytic rank-six factor used in the new integration test, the existing local gate reports direct support 1, variance reduction 10/11, and worst ratio 1/11. An action advantage0.25+cos(theta)nevertheless has minimum -0.75.This is a limitation of a local approximation, not an allegation that the existing API computes its declared local quantities incorrectly.
Method
The derivation includes the exact SO(2) correspondence stabilizer, a conditional dominance proposition, the squared-distance first-harmonic special case, prior-work positioning, and the downstream ownership boundary. BayesianPhysTwin still owns complete-belief candidate construction and exact fallback.
Executed controlled mechanism result
Seed 73029; four deliberately constructed families; 512 cases per family, 2,048 total. The orbit and error envelope contain truth by construction.
The equal-information gain is 512 -> 1,024 accepted cases relative to separate intervals. The anchored arm has additional information and is not an equal-budget comparison. The plug-in arm has greater mean deployed advantage than the unanchored certificate in this constructed mixture; this is a harm/acceptance trade-off, not uniform metric dominance. No confidence interval or population-level harm rate is claimed for these engineered controls.
Validation
Before publication: all 35 standalone tests passed under Python 3.13.5 / NumPy 2.3.5; source/tests compile; the 2,048-case study was executed. Integration tests against the actual existing query API and lint/type checks are included in the focused hosted workflow, but were not executed in the local partial checkout. CI is authoritative for those checks. The focused workflow also runs the existing query-observability tests and uploads its numerical result.
Claim boundary
Conditional analytic and constructed-mechanism evidence only. No real provider, protected source, target outcome, physical simulator, or Causal4D outcome was opened. This does not establish real-provider competence, calibrated uncertainty, arbitrary nonlinear-query safety, BayesianPhysTwin benefit, or Causal4D benefit. Floating-point extrema are not outward-rounded interval-arithmetic certificates. Generic rank-six or noisy/near-collinear factors do not prove the required orbit model.
Paper-facing evidence is being retained separately in FlorianPfaff/BayesianPhysTwin-Paper. The decisive future empirical test remains a source-qualified, newly frozen, garment-disjoint PointWorld/Flat'n'Fold physical-query arm under #333, not a retry of a closed negative cohort.