Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 98c617fdec
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review the exact head 98c617f for Branch 9W4E first-run Commander/Executor model setup and packaged Executor readiness integration. Current-head CI is green; fresh detached Runtime/TUI/CLI/targeted/historical validation is complete (historical 90/0); and the branch preserves restart-only activation, exact packaged-command identity, role isolation, and disabled capability flags. Please report P1/P2/P3 findings or leave a clean exact-head top-level comment. |
|
@codex review the exact head 3b86959 for Branch 9W4E. The prior startup-navigation P1 is fixed: authoritative missing setup may supersede only the stream-driven boot-to-resume transition, while intervening operator resume selection remains preserved. Direct regression plus the full TUI suite (344 pass, 0 fail) and typecheck pass; both current-head CI checks are green; the prior thread is resolved and outdated. Please report P1/P2/P3 findings or leave a clean exact-head top-level comment. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3b869598b5
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review the exact head 10ee3ec36d3c402a809bb22f79ee24d7316a468f for Branch 9W4E. The prior Escape P2 is fixed: committed setup with pending_restart=true now owns both Enter and Escape until process restart, while unchanged committed setup can still return to its origin. Direct regression plus focused/full TUI suites (344 pass, 0 fail) and typecheck pass; both current-head CI checks are green; all live threads are resolved. Please report P1/P2/P3 findings or leave a clean exact-head top-level comment. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 10ee3ec36b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review the exact head 51f6174440d4e5937f64338984765275086acf45 for Branch 9W4E. The prior process-authority P2 is fixed: persisted Executor setup now rejects openCodeAdapterFactoryOptions.spawn in addition to direct launch adapter/spawn overrides, preventing readiness and launch from using different process authority. The regression proves rejection before the injected spawn runs; focused Runtime is 596 pass, full Runtime is 1044 pass, typecheck passes; both current-head CI checks are green; all live threads are resolved. Please report P1/P2/P3 findings or leave a clean exact-head top-level comment. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Delightful! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
@codex review the exact head addccb6 for Branch 9W4E. The first-run startup P1 is fixed: model setup status is the first no-start mount check, missing or first-activation-pending setup returns before runtime.status and all broad reads, and complete-journal regressions prove zero adapter/process starts, scheduler bootstrap, runtime_started, or runtime_shutdown before commit and fresh reconstruction. Focused historical scenarios inspect the full journal (6 passed); full Runtime is 1044 pass, full TUI is 347 pass, CLI is 7 pass, targeted production setup E2E is 1 pass; both current-head CI checks are green. Please report P1/P2/P3 findings or leave a clean exact-head top-level comment. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: addccb6fa1
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review the exact head 638449f for Branch 9W4E. The prior interactive startup P1 is fixed: ProjectInitialized remains on a noninteractive boot surface while the no-start setup check is pending, keyboard dispatch is disabled during that window, and a required setup screen cannot be displaced by later initialization events. The regression covers pending, required, and clear navigation/input states; focused TUI is 75 pass, full TUI is 348 pass with typecheck green; both current-head CI checks are green; the prior thread is resolved. Please report P1/P2/P3 findings or leave a clean exact-head top-level comment. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 638449f8ab
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review |
|
@codex review Please perform a fresh detailed review of exact head c679f70. The Runtime now rejects model-setup confirmation for the entire owned startup operation, including pre-lock and post-authority-check readiness/adapter awaits. A delayed-start regression proves no setup event can append across startup. Please inspect this lifecycle serialization together with the complete prior 9W4E authority and TUI startup boundary. Both exact-head CI checks pass, and the complete local Runtime suite passes 1046 tests. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: c679f70811
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review Please perform a fresh detailed review of exact head aed3314. Startup and setup mutation now reserve one shared in-process mutex before either path awaits the filesystem run lock. Setup calls arriving after startup reject immediately; setup calls already waiting when startup begins yield lifecycle ownership to startup without either operation colliding on the run lock. Regressions cover both orderings, zero setup append, successful startup, and shutdown overlap. Both exact-head CI checks pass and the complete local Runtime suite passes 1047 tests. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: aed33149e9
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review Please review exact head |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 4a0f7d1527
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review Please review exact head |
|
@codex review Renewed exact-head review request for |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: c28a6ee91c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. You're on a roll. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
@codex review Please review exact head |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Keep them coming! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
@codex review Renewed detailed review request for exact head |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d53ce33cc7
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review Please review exact head |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 462f64099d
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
@codex review Please review exact head |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
|
@codex review Please review exact head |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray! Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
1 participant
Summary
Implements first-run Commander/Executor model setup on the packaged OpenCode Executor-readiness command.
runtime_model_setup_committedauthority append-only and activates it only on the next Runtime construction.--model, and disabled capability flags.Exact Revision
5c114669ebe8b6fd3ddd50a912a6ff821b882edd47c4305877352102e314966eb4762359b59870870 behind / 29 aheadCommit Map
b913b8d331f0e73ed8ca681b99bcd79ce2877020M9W4E: record first-run model setup boundary3898a25749c7abfcb335d8b8106f97c5abd75359M9W4E: add immutable setup catalog and durable authority957721ea30590656a611ace6575f37f78c7c5d5eM9W4E: add packaged Executor readiness integration3dfd81ac07b86e9b9555fb7041ab5a0a03b19342M9W4E: activate setup during next Runtime constructionebf304470caa9aeb897998f94fabebce29ceb61bM9W4E: add OpenTUI role-model onboarding9585062fc9ccdd114add71b7ef11f0dc7ab13d65M9W4E: prove restart readiness and launch through real user flow637eb7719cf21fc0ca9da6e6afda2ece514c7363M9W4E: harden packaged readiness identity evidence4948ca71b088b6daf2107175875dae6562757877M9W4E: align first-run onboarding evidence055ad03d020121256894816d000671cde8153b32M9W4E: preserve established setup authority flows26de3cc0afb0254b3d81737e16761c96a9f4f9c1M9W4E: preserve historical no-mutation evidence98c617fdec6f7b7d6e3abb81bf362945076dccf2M9W4E: record local validation evidence3b869598b54c042a4b22f8a5a1e657cae27acc7cM9W4E: preserve first-run setup navigation10ee3ec36b62122828dfbc48c8d5145d7c099ce0M9W4E: retain restart-required setup ownership51f617444c6944d26b6736a6db4e564e83bb3dd3M9W4E: enforce one OpenCode process authorityaddccb6fa161b531bd96bfec4eb2ac5da730e0c5M9W4E: gate first-run runtime startup638449f8ab9fd46204ff6e1c5338513814d395c1M9W4E: fence interactive startup on setup authority4809fe9630c6b9730f9c36886b9bf78ed758a10cM9W4E: fail closed on setup inspection errors69e6a082fb083177a1d3462cb91a7bfeea10179fM9W4E: close interactive and project-root startup bypasses050a61c1406facb100bd14680acfea440adf424bM9W4E: validate and recover setup startup inspectione55a5f3da5d3f1221d3ed78c9641ad551704e1afM9W4E: enforce exclusive complete setup authority5fd9b705720f97acb688e9ed70f29d4a724cf87fM9W4E: reject inconsistent and unavailable setup viewsc679f70811b4afcf996249037909cbc6ecf3c81eM9W4E: serialize setup mutation against startupaed33149e937fc5438ee85fadd8f195dd2d7d679M9W4E: reserve startup and setup authority atomically4a0f7d15276562295add85e2434470e832dc7488M9W4E: serialize readiness inspection with startupc28a6ee91c27fde57d902db09f8e8b48908ef170M9W4E: bound readiness observer terminationd53ce33cc73c2a1a5b6d435e22070894143ed3c5M9W4E: latch readiness termination authority462f64099dd96252f6c094b3ab15b38a52dc1b9fM9W4E: gate headless resume on model setup0b8b6a6aedf2167fd7260cd1c4c8bed988b6c94aM9W4E: enforce packaged Executor startup authority47c4305877352102e314966eb4762359b5987087M9W4E: require model setup before Runtime startupExact-Head Validation
Fresh detached worktree at exact head:
Mechanical checks:
Current-head gates:
22 resolved / 0 current unresolved / 0 outdated unresolvedThe earlier historical run in
phases/9W4E/VALIDATION.mdis superseded and excluded. The passing historical evidence above is a new detached run on the clean-reviewed exact head. Development failures and invalid invocations remain documented there.Exhaustive Changed Files
Diff Stat
Scope Exclusions
No credential storage/login UI, OpenCode
auth.jsonmutation, source observer, alternate readiness executable, provider/model discovery, dynamic provider loading, fallback, failover, retry, streaming, hot reload, auxiliary OpenCode model selection, external MCP/research, proposal/governance/mutation authority, upstream change, manifest/lockfile change, or frozen-file change was added.resume_supported=false,provider_tool_loop_enabled=false, andexternal_read_execution_enabled=falseremain unchanged.