An AI-powered toolkit for software development managers built with .NET 8 and Claude AI
Demonstrates: AI Integration • Prompt Engineering • .NET Architecture • Management Tools
DevTeam AI Assistant helps development managers make data-driven decisions by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) for analysis, review, and prioritization tasks.
Built by: Jacques Steward - Principle Consultant
Tech Stack: C# • .NET 8 • Anthropic Claude API • System.Text.Json
Purpose: Demonstrates practical LLM integration in enterprise .NET applications
This project includes comprehensive unit tests using NUnit, Moq, and FluentAssertions.
# Run all tests
dotnet test
# Run with detailed output
dotnet test --verbosity normal
# Run with code coverage
dotnet test /p:CollectCoverage=true- NUnit 4.3: Modern .NET testing framework
- Moq 4.20: Mocking library for dependency injection
- FluentAssertions: Readable assertion library
- Services: Configuration and initialization
- Features: All analyzer and runner classes
- Presenters: Output formatting and conditional rendering
- Models: Data structure validation
Transforms unstructured retrospective notes into actionable insights.
Input:
Sprint went well overall. Velocity increased from 35 to 42 points.
However, we had 3 production incidents due to insufficient testing.
Deployment process still takes 4 hours - needs automation.
Sarah did excellent work on the authentication refactor.
Output:
- Overall sentiment analysis (Positive/Neutral/Negative)
- Key themes extraction
- Prioritized action items with effort estimates
- Wins and concerns identification
- Manager-specific recommendations
Value: Saves ~2 hours per retrospective in manual analysis
Provides architectural, security, and best practice review of C# code.
Analyzes:
- Architecture & design patterns
- Security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, etc.)
- Performance bottlenecks
- SOLID principles compliance
- .NET best practices
- Async/await anti-patterns
Returns: Severity-ranked feedback with line numbers and specific suggestions
Value: Catches issues humans might miss, provides consistent review standards
ROI-based prioritization of technical debt items.
Evaluates:
- Business impact vs. implementation effort
- Security and stability risks
- Dependencies between items
- Estimated effort in days
- ROI score (1-100)
Returns: Prioritized backlog with reasoning and strategic recommendations
Value: Data-driven roadmap planning, objective prioritization
┌──────────────────────┐
│ Console Interface │
└──────────┬───────────┘
│
┌─────▼──────┐
│ Features │ (Retrospective, CodeReview, TechDebt)
└─────┬──────┘
│
┌──────▼───────┐
│ClaudeService │ (HTTP Client wrapper)
└──────┬───────┘
│
┌─────▼──────┐
│ Claude API │ (Anthropic)
└────────────┘
Design Principles:
- ✅ Clean separation of concerns
- ✅ Interface-based dependency injection
- ✅ Structured LLM responses (JSON)
- ✅ Comprehensive error handling
- ✅ Single Responsibility Principle
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/YOUR_USERNAME/DevTeamAIAssistant.git
cd DevTeamAIAssistant
# Restore dependencies
dotnet restore- Copy the example configuration:
cp appsettings.example.json appsettings.json-
Add your Anthropic API key:
Edit
appsettings.json:
{
"Anthropic": {
"ApiKey": "sk-ant-api03-your-actual-key-here",
"Model": "claude-sonnet-4-20250514"
}
}- Get an API key:
- Go to Anthropic Console
- Create a new API key
- Copy and paste into
appsettings.json
appsettings.json to version control. It's gitignored by default.
dotnet runInput:
Team completed 45 story points (up from 35).
Sarah's refactoring of auth system was excellent.
Still seeing deployment delays - takes 3+ hours.
2 production incidents this sprint - need better testing.
Communication between frontend/backend teams improved.
Output:
📊 Overall Sentiment: POSITIVE
🎯 Key Themes:
• Velocity improvement
• Deployment automation needs
• Production quality concerns
• Cross-team collaboration success
✅ Wins:
• 29% velocity increase
• Successful authentication refactor
• Improved team communication
⚠️ Concerns:
• Manual deployment bottleneck
• Production incident rate
📋 Action Items:
[HIGH] Implement CI/CD pipeline to reduce deployment time
Owner: DevOps Lead | Effort: 5 days
[HIGH] Add pre-production smoke tests
Owner: QA Lead | Effort: 3 days
💡 Manager Recommendation:
Focus on automation to sustain velocity gains. Consider
dedicating 1 sprint to infrastructure improvements.
Input: (C# code with issues)
Output:
📊 Quality Score: 6/10
🔒 Security Concerns:
⚠️ SQL Injection vulnerability in GetUser method
⚠️ Hardcoded connection string with credentials
⚠️ Password exposed in API response
✅ Best Practices Observed:
• Using 'using' statements for IDisposable
• Async/await pattern usage
💬 Review Comments:
[CRITICAL]
Security: SQL injection vulnerability detected
💡 Use parameterized queries with SqlParameter
📍 Line 15
[HIGH]
Architecture: Hardcoded connection string
💡 Move to configuration file with dependency injection
📍 Line 8
Input:
Legacy authentication system using MD5 hashing
Monolithic API needs microservices split
No monitoring or logging in production
Database queries not optimized
No automated backups configured
Output:
⚠️ Risk Assessment:
High risk due to authentication vulnerabilities and lack
of production monitoring
📊 Total Estimated Effort: 25 days
🎯 Prioritized Backlog:
🔴 Priority: 10/10 | Impact: High | Effort: High
ROI Score: 95/100
Legacy authentication system using MD5 hashing
💭 Critical security vulnerability affecting all users
⏱️ Estimated: 10 days
🟡 Priority: 8/10 | Impact: High | Effort: Medium
ROI Score: 85/100
No monitoring or logging in production
💭 Cannot diagnose issues, high operational risk
⏱️ Estimated: 5 days
🔗 Dependencies: None
💡 Strategic Recommendation:
Address security vulnerabilities immediately. Authentication
system poses the highest risk. Plan monitoring implementation
in parallel to provide visibility during other improvements.
This project demonstrates proficiency in:
AI Integration:
- ✅ LLM API integration in .NET
- ✅ Prompt engineering for structured outputs
- ✅ JSON deserialization from AI responses
- ✅ Error handling for non-deterministic systems
Software Architecture:
- ✅ Clean architecture principles
- ✅ Dependency injection patterns
- ✅ Interface-based design
- ✅ HTTP client best practices
- ✅ Configuration management
Development Management:
- ✅ Understanding of Agile workflows
- ✅ Code review automation
- ✅ Technical debt management
- ✅ Data-driven decision making
| Technology | Purpose |
|---|---|
| .NET 8.0 | Runtime framework |
| C# 12 | Programming language |
| Anthropic Claude API | LLM provider |
| System.Text.Json | JSON serialization |
| HttpClient | API communication |
| Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration | App configuration |
DevTeamAIAssistant/
├── Program.cs # Application entry point
├── Services/
│ ├── IClaudeService.cs # Service interface
│ └── ClaudeService.cs # Claude API integration
├── Features/
│ ├── IAnalyzer.cs # Generic analyzer interface
│ ├── IAnalyzerRunner.cs # Runner interface
│ ├── IAnalyzerFactory.cs # Factory interface
│ ├── AnalyzerBase.cs # Shared analyzer logic & input sanitization
│ ├── AnalyzerRunnerBase.cs # Shared runner orchestration
│ ├── AnalyzerFactory.cs # Feature registration & lookup
│ ├── IO/
│ │ ├── IConsoleWriter.cs
│ │ ├── IConsoleReader.cs
│ │ ├── ConsoleWriter.cs
│ │ └── ConsoleReader.cs
│ ├── Presenters/
│ │ └── IAnalyzerPresenter.cs # Generic presenter interface
│ ├── Retrospective/
│ │ ├── RetrospectiveAnalyzer.cs
│ │ ├── RetrospectiveRunner.cs
│ │ └── RetrospectivePresenter.cs
│ ├── CodeReview/
│ │ ├── CodeReviewAnalyzer.cs
│ │ ├── CodeReviewRunner.cs
│ │ └── CodeReviewPresenter.cs
│ └── TechDebt/
│ ├── TechDebtPriorityAnalyzer.cs
│ ├── TechDebtRunner.cs
│ └── TechDebtPresenter.cs
├── Models/ # Domain models
├── Requests/ # Request contracts
├── Response/ # Response contracts
├── DevTeamAIAssistant.test/
│ ├── Features/
│ │ ├── Presenters/ # Presenter output tests
│ │ └── ... # Analyzer & runner tests
│ ├── Models/
│ └── Services/
├── appsettings.json # Config (gitignored)
├── appsettings.example.json # Config template
├── .gitignore
├── LICENSE
└── README.md
- Web UI - Blazor Server interface for browser-based access
- Persistence - SQLite/PostgreSQL for storing analysis history
- Azure DevOps Integration - Pull work items and sprint data automatically
- Jira Integration - Sync with existing project management tools
- Team Dashboard - Visualize trends over time
- Slack/Teams Bot - Chat interface for quick analysis
- Multi-Model Support - Add GPT-4, Gemini options
- Docker Container - Containerized deployment
- Unit Tests - 73 tests covering analyzers, runners, presenters, models, and services
- GitHub Actions CI/CD - Automated build and test pipeline
This is a portfolio/learning project, but contributions are welcome!
Areas for improvement:
- Additional analysis features
- Better prompt engineering
- UI enhancements
- Integration with more tools
- Performance optimizations
To contribute:
- Fork the repository
- Create a feature branch (
git checkout -b feature/amazing-feature) - Commit your changes (
git commit -m 'Add amazing feature') - Push to the branch (
git push origin feature/amazing-feature) - Open a Pull Request
MIT License - See LICENSE file for details
Jacques Steward
Software Development Manager | 10+ Years .NET/C# | AI-Augmented Development Advocate
- Built with Anthropic Claude
- Inspired by real development management challenges
- Created as a demonstration of AI-augmented development workflows
- Language: C#
- Framework: .NET 8.0
- Lines of Code: ~1,100
- Test Count: 73 unit tests
- Dependencies: 2 NuGet packages
- Build Time: 1-2 weeks
- API Cost: ~$0.50 for testing
This project includes API key management best practices:
- API keys stored in gitignored configuration files
- Example configuration provided for setup
- Environment variable support available
- Never commit secrets to version control
⭐ If you find this useful, please star the repository!
💬 Questions or suggestions? Open an issue or reach out on LinkedIn.
Built with ❤️ and AI assistance to demonstrate practical LLM integration in enterprise .NET applications