start_review_flow returns True for the mixed-outcome path, but the docstring is vague about what qualifies as "mixed." The reviewer flagged that submit_review can fail for reasons unrelated to the card itself — e.g. bad review-time value or invalid user ID — and those failures are silently lumped into the same True return as a genuine partial success. It's not clear from the diff that these error classes are distinguished.
Verifier's note (verbatim): “"I didn't really see it handle all types of card failures or submit a review failures just that it failed never really telling me"”
Surfaced from an SVP cognitive-evidence verification of #39. Not an independent audit — this is the human verifier's own observation, cleaned up.
start_review_flowreturnsTruefor the mixed-outcome path, but the docstring is vague about what qualifies as "mixed." The reviewer flagged thatsubmit_reviewcan fail for reasons unrelated to the card itself — e.g. bad review-time value or invalid user ID — and those failures are silently lumped into the sameTruereturn as a genuine partial success. It's not clear from the diff that these error classes are distinguished.Surfaced from an SVP cognitive-evidence verification of #39. Not an independent audit — this is the human verifier's own observation, cleaned up.