🧪 Add robust testing for format_date utility - #87
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Jandir <3695656+Jandir@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
🎯 What: The
format_datefunction inutils.py(which sanitizes dates from YouTube/Vimeo into YYYY-MM-DD formats) was previously untested, leaving a coverage gap for edge cases and unexpected inputs.📊 Coverage: A new test file
tests/test_utils.pywas introduced. It usespytest.mark.parametrizeto rigorously cover:Noneinputs gracefully defaulting to "Desconhecida".✨ Result: Enhanced codebase reliability by ensuring the date extraction step behaves predictably without raising exceptions, preventing potential formatting regressions during future refactors. Test suite successfully validates 14 scenarios for the target logic.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 17078472301702031387 started by @Jandir