Skip to content

test(not-found): add massive scaling coverage for repeated renders and layout stability#5368

Merged
JhaSourav07 merged 1 commit into
JhaSourav07:mainfrom
Thacker-Meet:test/not-found-massive-scaling
Jun 13, 2026
Merged

test(not-found): add massive scaling coverage for repeated renders and layout stability#5368
JhaSourav07 merged 1 commit into
JhaSourav07:mainfrom
Thacker-Meet:test/not-found-massive-scaling

Conversation

@Thacker-Meet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fixes #4360

Added a dedicated massive-scaling test suite for the app/not-found.tsx page.

What was tested?

  • Repeated component mounts to verify rendering stability.
  • Terminal content integrity across multiple render cycles.
  • Navigation link availability under high render volume.
  • Render performance remains within acceptable limits.
  • Layout structure preservation during bulk rendering scenarios.

The tests focus on validating component behavior under high-volume rendering conditions while ensuring UI structure and accessibility remain intact.

Pillar

  • 🛠️ Other (Bug fix, refactoring, docs)

Visual Preview

  • N/A – Test-only changes.

Checklist before requesting a review:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md file.
  • I have tested these changes locally (localhost:3000/api/streak?user=YOUR_USERNAME).
  • I have run npm run format and npm run lint locally and resolved all errors (CI will fail otherwise).
  • My commits follow the Conventional Commits format (e.g., feat(themes): ..., fix(calculate): ...).
  • I have started the repo.
  • I have made sure that i have only one commit to merge in this PR.
  • The SVG output matches the CommitPulse "premium quality" aesthetic standard (no raw elements, smooth animations, correct fonts).
  • (Recommended) I joined the CommitPulse Discord community for contributor discussions, mentorship, and faster PR support.

@Aamod-Dev Aamod-Dev added type:testing Adding, updating, or fixing tests level:advanced Complex contributions involving architecture, optimization, or significant feature work quality:clean PR follows clean coding practices, proper formatting, documentation, and maintainability standards. labels Jun 13, 2026
@Thacker-Meet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @Aamod007 @souravjhahind

I am a GSSoC'26 contributor.

please can you add the labels "GSSoC 2026" and "GSSoC:approved".

@Thacker-Meet

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

hi @Aamod007

please can you add another GSSoC label "GSSoC:aprroved", if this label is not present in the Pull Request and GSSoC'26 will not count this PR.

@Aamod-Dev Aamod-Dev added the gssoc:approved PR has been reviewed and accepted for valid contribution points label Jun 13, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the GSSoC 2026 milestone Jun 13, 2026
@JhaSourav07 JhaSourav07 merged commit a25a045 into JhaSourav07:main Jun 13, 2026
10 checks passed
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎉 Congratulations @Thacker-Meet! Your PR has been successfully merged. 🚀

Thank you for contributing to CommitPulse. Your work helps us build a better tool for the community.

⚠️ Important for GSSoC Contributors:
You are strictly advised to join our Discord Server as it is mandatory for all GSSoC participants. All important announcements, point claims, and community discussions happen there.

Keep building! 💻✨

@JhaSourav07 JhaSourav07 added gssoc:approved PR has been reviewed and accepted for valid contribution points and removed gssoc:approved PR has been reviewed and accepted for valid contribution points labels Jun 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

gssoc:approved PR has been reviewed and accepted for valid contribution points GSSoC 2026 level:advanced Complex contributions involving architecture, optimization, or significant feature work quality:clean PR follows clean coding practices, proper formatting, documentation, and maintainability standards. type:testing Adding, updating, or fixing tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

test(not-found-massive-scaling): verify Massive Data Sets and Extreme High Bounds Scaling (Variation 2)

3 participants