Skip to content

fix: restore missing feature cards in Why CommitPulse section#5396

Merged
JhaSourav07 merged 2 commits into
JhaSourav07:mainfrom
devansh6107:fix-why-commitpulse-section-v2
Jun 12, 2026
Merged

fix: restore missing feature cards in Why CommitPulse section#5396
JhaSourav07 merged 2 commits into
JhaSourav07:mainfrom
devansh6107:fix-why-commitpulse-section-v2

Conversation

@devansh6107

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fixes #5372

Restored the missing feature cards in the "Why CommitPulse?" section on the landing page.

  • Restored the three feature cards:

    • Real-time Sync
    • Theme Engine
    • Isometric Math
  • Restored the corresponding icons for each feature card.

  • Moved WallOfLove below the feature cards section.

Pillar

  • 🎨 Pillar 1 — New Theme Design
  • 📐 Pillar 2 — Geometric SVG Improvement
  • 🕐 Pillar 3 — Timezone Logic Optimization
  • 🛠️ Other (Bug fix, refactoring, docs)

Visual Preview

Before: The "Why CommitPulse?" section displayed only the heading, with the feature cards missing.

After: The three feature cards are rendered correctly and the Wall of Love section appears below them.

Checklist before requesting a review:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md file.
  • I have tested these changes locally (localhost:3000/api/streak?user=YOUR_USERNAME).
  • I have run npm run format and npm run lint locally and resolved all errors (CI will fail otherwise).
  • My commits follow the Conventional Commits format (e.g., feat(themes): ..., fix(calculate): ...).
  • I have updated README.md if I added a new theme or URL parameter.
  • I have started the repo.
  • I have made sure that i have only one commit to merge in this PR.
  • The SVG output matches the CommitPulse "premium quality" aesthetic standard (no raw elements, smooth animations, correct fonts).
  • (Recommended) I joined the CommitPulse Discord community for contributor discussions, mentorship, and faster PR support.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@devansh6107 is attempting to deploy a commit to the jhasourav07's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@Aamod-Dev Aamod-Dev left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for restoring the missing feature cards in the 'Why CommitPulse' section! It looks much better now with the complete set of cards rendering correctly.

Your code is perfect. However, the CI pipeline will currently fail due to an unrelated test divergence in lib/svg/themes.test.ts on the main branch.

To get a green build, simply run git pull --rebase origin main and force push your branch. I'll be ready to merge once that runs!

Labels Applied:

  • level:beginner: Simple DOM rendering and component usage.
  • type:bug: Restored missing content.
  • quality:clean: Flawless syntax.
  • mentor:Aamod007

@Aamod-Dev Aamod-Dev added GSSoc26 GSSoC 2026 level:intermediate Moderate complexity tasks quality:clean PR follows clean coding practices, proper formatting, documentation, and maintainability standards. type:bug Something isn't working as expected type:feature New features, additions, or enhancements type:security Security fixes, dependency updates, or hardening mentor:Aamod007 and removed GSSoc26 labels Jun 12, 2026

@Aamod-Dev Aamod-Dev left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution. I went through the changes and the overall approach looks good.

@devansh6107 devansh6107 force-pushed the fix-why-commitpulse-section-v2 branch from 459b7e2 to abe6e02 Compare June 12, 2026 19:54
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the status:blocked This PR is blocked due to a failing CI check. label Jun 12, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Hey @devansh6107, the CI Pipeline is failing on this PR and it has been marked as status:blocked.

Please fix the issues before this can be reviewed. Here's how:

1. Run checks locally before pushing:

npm run format:check   # Check Prettier formatting
npm run lint           # Run ESLint
npm run typecheck      # TypeScript type check
npm run test           # Run unit tests (Vitest)
npm run build          # Verify production build passes

2. Auto-fix common issues:

npm run format         # Auto-fix formatting with Prettier
npm run lint -- --fix  # Auto-fix lint errors where possible

3. Check the full failure log here:
👉 View CI Run

Once you push a fix and the CI passes, the status:blocked label will be removed automatically. 💪

@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the status:blocked This PR is blocked due to a failing CI check. label Jun 12, 2026
@JhaSourav07 JhaSourav07 added the gssoc:approved PR has been reviewed and accepted for valid contribution points label Jun 12, 2026
@JhaSourav07 JhaSourav07 merged commit bbc1939 into JhaSourav07:main Jun 12, 2026
5 of 6 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the GSSoC 2026 milestone Jun 12, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎉 Congratulations @devansh6107! Your PR has been successfully merged. 🚀

Thank you for contributing to CommitPulse. Your work helps us build a better tool for the community.

⚠️ Important for GSSoC Contributors:
You are strictly advised to join our Discord Server as it is mandatory for all GSSoC participants. All important announcements, point claims, and community discussions happen there.

Keep building! 💻✨

@Aamod-Dev Aamod-Dev left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch! I went through the changes and restoring the missing feature cards brings back the essential informational elements of the landing page.
Labels applied:

  • level:intermediate: Layout restoration.
  • quality:clean: Simple effective DOM fix.
  • ype:bug: Fixes missing UI elements.

@JhaSourav07 JhaSourav07 added gssoc:approved PR has been reviewed and accepted for valid contribution points and removed gssoc:approved PR has been reviewed and accepted for valid contribution points labels Jun 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

gssoc:approved PR has been reviewed and accepted for valid contribution points GSSoC 2026 level:intermediate Moderate complexity tasks mentor:Aamod007 quality:clean PR follows clean coding practices, proper formatting, documentation, and maintainability standards. type:bug Something isn't working as expected type:feature New features, additions, or enhancements type:security Security fixes, dependency updates, or hardening

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: "Why CommitPulse?" section displays no content on homepage

3 participants