Updated all the python and pantab version also fixed pyarrow handling.#12
Conversation
…issue with pandas~=2.1.3
pgodden-jisc
left a comment
pgodden-jisc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code seems sensible, One query around the new vulnerabilities we're ignoring.
Shalini has explained the reasoning for changes to the validation script:
"""
I updated the code in validation.py after upgrading to pantab 5.3.0. The previous implementation used a HyperProcess/Connection together with frame_from_hyper_query, but in the newer pantab version this caused issues because pantab now manages its own Hyper process internally. This resulted in file access conflicts (multiple Hyper engines trying to open the same .hyper file), so I refactored the code to use frame_from_hyper_query directly with the file path instead of passing a connection.
"""
| local: true | ||
| # These are issues with the audit checker itself! | ||
| ignore-vulns: PYSEC-2023-74 PYSEC-2022-43012 PYSEC-2023-228 PYSEC-2023-221 GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56 GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7 GHSA-pq67-6m6q-mj2v | ||
| ignore-vulns: PYSEC-2023-74 PYSEC-2022-43012 PYSEC-2023-228 PYSEC-2023-221 GHSA-9wx4-h78v-vm56 GHSA-9hjg-9r4m-mvj7 GHSA-pq67-6m6q-mj2v GHSA-gc5v-m9x4-r6x2 GHSA-gm62-xv2j-4w53 GHSA-2xpw-w6gg-jr37 GHSA-38jv-5279-wg99 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Query: Why are we ignoring these vulnerabilities?
2 participants
No description provided.