Skip to content

feat: use MCP conformance baseline instead of scenario allowlist - #186

Merged
trepel merged 1 commit into
Kuadrant:mainfrom
trepel:conformance-baseline
Sep 2, 2026
Merged

feat: use MCP conformance baseline instead of scenario allowlist#186
trepel merged 1 commit into
Kuadrant:mainfrom
trepel:conformance-baseline

Conversation

@trepel

@trepel trepel commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Move the MCP conformance task from a hardcoded per-scenario loop to a single --suite all run against the 2025-11-25 spec

Changes

Bump to conformance tests v0.1.16

Add parameter to specify a baseline file - a file with scenario names that are expected to fail (at least one check in that scenario ends up with failure or warning)

Move the MCP conformance task from a hardcoded per-scenario loop to a single --suite all run against the 2025-11-25 spec and ignore expected failures based on baseline file

Update reporting to RP so that each reported test entry contains both scenario name and unique check-id. Previously the entries only contained scenario name so if scenario contained more that one check there were mutiple entries reported with the same name in RP.

Added logic to reporting so that scenarios from baseline file are treated as skipped in RP

Signed-off-by: Tomas Repel <trepel@redhat.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

  • 🔍 Trigger review

This repository does not receive automatic reviews because it has fewer than 10 stars.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: 75261760-e6c7-4191-abc4-763baf860597


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@trepel
trepel requested a review from azgabur September 1, 2026 12:20
@trepel
trepel merged commit 91043b5 into Kuadrant:main Sep 2, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants