Draft
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
HOLD: This will be useful when we'll want to change the method for the fingerprint computation method, but for now, it is more efficient to extract the computed fingerprint from The idea is that this is sometimes very tedious to compute efficiently and swapping methods is not straightforward because it requires modifying the metrics themselves etc. By using a fingerprint store and a fingerprint extraction abstraction, we avoid going through that route. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds an example for how to create a dataset store using a reference dataset (here we use LeMat-Bulk). A novelty metric is then implemented based on that.
The goal is to expand on this novelty metric to have a better chosen store and equivalence checker and then refine the metric.