FSRS Decay Idempotency Verification - #4
Conversation
Verified that `last_accessed = NOW()` is already implemented in the `UPDATE` query within `src/cuba_memorys/handlers.py:_consolidate_decay` and `src/cuba_memorys/protocol.py:_rem_consolidation`. This ensures that repeated FSRS decay runs do not compound decay exponentially by updating the reference timestamp and using a 24-hour guard in the `WHERE` clause. Co-authored-by: LeandroPG19 <151863062+LeandroPG19@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
1 participant
The requested fix for FSRS decay idempotency (adding
last_accessed = NOW()to the UPDATE query) was found to be already present in the codebase at the specified location (src/cuba_memorys/handlers.py:1205) and consistently applied in the background REM consolidation task (src/cuba_memorys/protocol.py).I have performed the following verifications:
src/cuba_memorys/handlers.pyand confirmed line 1215 contains"last_accessed = NOW() ".src/cuba_memorys/protocol.pyand confirmed line 143 contains"last_accessed = NOW() ".Since the code already meets the requirements, no further changes were necessary.
PR created automatically by Jules for task 14683007522980271680 started by @LeandroPG19