Hi! Thank you for sharing great work!!
I have a question about equation 11 in the paper.
In the paper, it is noted that optimizing using equation 10 results in suboptimal solution as
"weights αi for different samples in a ray are driven closer.
This results in an unexpectedly large fraction of non-zero density in the whole scene, causing blurs on the object’s surface"
I'd like to understand why the optimization moves in such direction.
It will be a great help for me if you can share your knowledge!
Thank you!
Hi! Thank you for sharing great work!!
I have a question about equation 11 in the paper.
In the paper, it is noted that optimizing using equation 10 results in suboptimal solution as
"weights αi for different samples in a ray are driven closer.
This results in an unexpectedly large fraction of non-zero density in the whole scene, causing blurs on the object’s surface"
I'd like to understand why the optimization moves in such direction.
It will be a great help for me if you can share your knowledge!
Thank you!