Skip to content

docs(observability): record bounded telemetry evidence audit - #193

Draft
kaveh8866 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/observability-evidence-audit
Draft

kaveh8866 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/observability-evidence-audit

Conversation

@kaveh8866

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

1. Contribution Path & Summary

2. Tests & Verification

  • pnpm test — not run: connector-only static documentation change
  • pnpm test:python — not run
  • pnpm typecheck — not run
  • pnpm lint / boundaries — not run
  • Exact-head GitHub CI — pending; do not infer pass from an earlier main commit
  • Read-only source/issue preflight on main 979cf511e2fc57811fb3cef3766be1653a2e45f5
  • Isolated JavaScript demonstration of nested JSON replacer behavior; not a SemantIQ test run

3. Compatibility & Cross-Language Parity

Not applicable: documentation addition only; existing schema 1.0.0, TS/Python SDKs, trace hashing, benchmark scores and fixtures remain untouched.

4. Security & Privacy Impact

5. Scientific Methodology & Behavioral Evidence Impact

  • Preserves Observed ≠ Inferred, absence ≠ counterevidence, and explicit unknown/insufficient evidence.
  • Does not promote scientific evidence, benchmark maturity, or external-implementation claims.
  • Classifications are a bounded static audit, not a live integration conformance report.
  • Full audit completion remains open in audit(observability): verify current-main telemetry and evidence boundaries #188.

6. Documentation & Guides

  • Added Docs/ecosystem/OBSERVABILITY_EVIDENCE_AUDIT_2026-10-10.md
  • Keeps existing Integration Graph explicitly historical; no retroactive modifications.
  • Defines roadmap handoff and separate gated follow-up issues.

7. Migration Impact & Breaking Changes

  • Breaking Change: No
  • Migration: Not applicable

8. Review Readiness

  • One new documentation file; focused branch from protected main
  • Required CI and CODEOWNER approval not yet obtained
  • No auto-merge, no branch-protection bypass, no changes to protected main
  • No external repository code copied

Requested review: Validate the evidence table, F1/F2/F3 boundaries, the claim/missingness vocabulary, and whether #192 should be prioritized before downstream optional exporter work. This PR must remain Draft until evidence quality is accepted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant