Repository navigation
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary / status
DRAFT / test-only / no production migration. A separate prospective proof-of-concept for RFC #196 and #192. Based on protected
main89cfdcb10ab407f5c1ef84b8cda05894b5dd4a2a.One new unit-test file
tests/unit/observation-digest-profile-prototype.test.tsexplores:legacy-ts-v0);semantiq-canonical-json-v1nested evidence sensitivity using the already implemented shared canonicalizer;evidenceDigestfrom its subject and explicitly handled optionalinterpretation;Not implemented: active new-
ObservationEvidenceproducer, schema or profile registry changes, privacy/redaction policy, cross-language evidence-verifier parity, historical rehash, or any migration of public evidence. The test-only projection is intentionally incomplete and cannot be treated as a canonical artifact contract. The RFC must be approved before any Core or production behavior change.Governance
c97b42f636539d0ab03dcd04b6bfdafde22e9306(CI run 38089437571); CODEOWNER approval is still pendingmainunchanged by this PRObserved ≠ Inferred, integrity ≠ truth; no new external performance/security claims.Related: characterization Draft PR #195; roadmap #177, #188, #192.