chore(deps): january updates #741
Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings. WalkthroughThis PR updates dependency versions across example and package configuration files, specifically bumping rimraf, jitar, TypeScript-eslint, rollup, and vite to newer patch and minor versions. Additionally, ESLint suppression directives are refined in two source files by removing unnecessary lint rule suppressions. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
examples/error-handling/package.json (1)
15-15: LGTM! Dependency updates are consistent.The rimraf and jitar version bumps match the updates across other example projects.
Also applies to: 19-19
examples/multi-version/package.json (1)
12-12: LGTM! Dependency updates are consistent.The rimraf and jitar version bumps match the updates across other example projects.
Also applies to: 16-16
examples/hello-world/package.json (1)
12-12: LGTM! Dependency updates are consistent.The rimraf and jitar version bumps match the updates across other example projects.
Also applies to: 16-16
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
examples/access-protection/package.jsonexamples/data-transportation/package.jsonexamples/error-handling/package.jsonexamples/health-checks/package.jsonexamples/hello-world/package.jsonexamples/load-balancing/package.jsonexamples/middleware/package.jsonexamples/multi-version/package.jsonexamples/resources/package.jsonexamples/segmentation/package.jsonpackage.jsonpackages/jitar/package.jsonpackages/plugin-vite/package.jsonpackages/serialization/src/SerializerBuilder.tspackages/sourcing/src/modules/RemoteModuleLocator.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (5)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: basmasking
Repo: MaskingTechnology/jitar PR: 678
File: packages/validation/package.json:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T19:44:53.054Z
Learning: In the jitar monorepo, standardized tooling dependencies like rimraf, vitest, and typescript are intentionally defined once at the root level package.json and rely on npm hoisting rather than being duplicated in each individual package's package.json file. Package-specific dependencies should be in individual package.json files, but common tooling should be centralized.
Learnt from: basmasking
Repo: MaskingTechnology/jitar PR: 706
File: examples/resources/package.json:11-14
Timestamp: 2025-11-01T12:49:12.253Z
Learning: Examples in the jitar monorepo (files under examples/ directory) are not included in the workspace setup, so npm hoisting does not work for them. Unlike packages, examples must declare their own devDependencies (like rimraf, typescript, etc.) directly in their package.json files.
📚 Learning: 2025-07-28T19:44:53.054Z
Learnt from: basmasking
Repo: MaskingTechnology/jitar PR: 678
File: packages/validation/package.json:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T19:44:53.054Z
Learning: In the jitar monorepo, standardized tooling dependencies like rimraf, vitest, and typescript are intentionally defined once at the root level package.json and rely on npm hoisting rather than being duplicated in each individual package's package.json file. Package-specific dependencies should be in individual package.json files, but common tooling should be centralized.
Applied to files:
examples/access-protection/package.jsonexamples/data-transportation/package.jsonexamples/middleware/package.jsonexamples/hello-world/package.jsonexamples/health-checks/package.jsonexamples/error-handling/package.jsonexamples/load-balancing/package.jsonexamples/resources/package.jsonexamples/multi-version/package.jsonexamples/segmentation/package.json
📚 Learning: 2025-07-28T19:38:55.816Z
Learnt from: basmasking
Repo: MaskingTechnology/jitar PR: 678
File: packages/init/templates/jitar-only/package.json:6-6
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T19:38:55.816Z
Learning: Jitar templates use a jitar.json configuration structure with "source": "./dist", "target": "./dist", and "segments": "./segments", where the CLI rewrites files from the dist folder back to the dist folder, and segment configuration files are found in the segments folder.
Applied to files:
examples/access-protection/package.jsonexamples/data-transportation/package.jsonexamples/middleware/package.jsonexamples/hello-world/package.jsonexamples/health-checks/package.jsonexamples/error-handling/package.jsonexamples/load-balancing/package.jsonexamples/resources/package.jsonexamples/multi-version/package.jsonexamples/segmentation/package.json
📚 Learning: 2025-07-28T19:38:55.816Z
Learnt from: basmasking
Repo: MaskingTechnology/jitar PR: 678
File: packages/init/templates/jitar-only/package.json:6-6
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T19:38:55.816Z
Learning: In jitar templates (like packages/init/templates/jitar-only/package.json), the jitar build command doesn't produce a .jitar folder. Templates use a jitar.json configuration where both source and target point to "./dist", unlike examples where a .jitar folder may be generated.
Applied to files:
examples/access-protection/package.jsonexamples/data-transportation/package.jsonexamples/middleware/package.jsonexamples/hello-world/package.jsonexamples/health-checks/package.jsonexamples/error-handling/package.jsonexamples/load-balancing/package.jsonexamples/resources/package.jsonexamples/multi-version/package.jsonexamples/segmentation/package.json
📚 Learning: 2025-11-01T12:49:12.253Z
Learnt from: basmasking
Repo: MaskingTechnology/jitar PR: 706
File: examples/resources/package.json:11-14
Timestamp: 2025-11-01T12:49:12.253Z
Learning: Examples in the jitar monorepo (files under examples/ directory) are not included in the workspace setup, so npm hoisting does not work for them. Unlike packages, examples must declare their own devDependencies (like rimraf, typescript, etc.) directly in their package.json files.
Applied to files:
examples/access-protection/package.jsonexamples/data-transportation/package.jsonexamples/middleware/package.jsonexamples/hello-world/package.jsonexamples/health-checks/package.jsonexamples/error-handling/package.jsonexamples/load-balancing/package.jsonexamples/resources/package.jsonexamples/multi-version/package.jsonexamples/segmentation/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (10)
examples/load-balancing/package.json (1)
15-15: Dependency updates are consistent and correct.The updates to rimraf (6.1.2) and jitar (0.10.4) match the versions used in other examples, ensuring consistency across the project. Based on learnings, examples correctly maintain their own devDependencies.
Also applies to: 19-19
examples/resources/package.json (1)
12-12: Dependency updates are consistent and correct.The updates to rimraf (6.1.2) and jitar (0.10.4) match the versions used in other examples, maintaining consistency. Based on learnings, examples correctly maintain their own devDependencies.
Also applies to: 16-16
packages/plugin-vite/package.json (1)
31-31: Vite version update to 7.3.0 is appropriate.The minor version bump from ^7.2.6 to ^7.3.0 is backward compatible and maintains alignment with the peerDependencies range (>=7.0.0). No security advisories found for this version.
examples/access-protection/package.json (1)
15-15: Dependency updates look good.The patch version bumps for rimraf (6.1.0→6.1.2) and jitar (0.10.3→0.10.4) follow semantic versioning and are both latest releases in their respective series. Examples correctly maintain their own devDependencies since they're not included in the workspace setup.
package.json (1)
27-27: No action needed. The TypeScript ESLint versions (8.51.0 for both @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin and typescript-eslint) are valid releases on npm and are compatible with each other.examples/data-transportation/package.json (1)
15-15: Dependency versions verified as valid and up-to-date.Both
rimraf@6.1.2andjitar@0.10.4are confirmed to exist on npm and are the latest available versions for each package. No known security vulnerabilities or CVEs were found for either dependency.packages/serialization/src/SerializerBuilder.ts (1)
23-23: LGTM!Minor whitespace adjustment with no functional impact.
examples/health-checks/package.json (1)
12-12: LGTM!Dependency version updates are consistent with other examples in this PR. Refer to the verification script in
examples/segmentation/package.jsonfor version validation.Also applies to: 16-16
packages/sourcing/src/modules/RemoteModuleLocator.ts (1)
10-16: LGTM!Refined ESLint directive appropriately removes the unnecessary
no-useless-constructorsuppression while maintainingno-unused-varsfor the intentionally unusedlocationparameter. This aligns with the linting cleanup objective.examples/middleware/package.json (1)
12-12: LGTM!Dependency version updates are consistent with other examples in this PR. Refer to the verification script in
examples/segmentation/package.jsonfor version validation.Also applies to: 16-16
| }, | ||
| "devDependencies": { | ||
| "rimraf": "6.1.0", | ||
| "rimraf": "6.1.2", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
# Check if rimraf is defined in root package.json
cat package.json | jq '.devDependencies.rimraf, .dependencies.rimraf' 2>/dev/null || grep -A 20 '"rimraf"' package.json 2>/dev/null || echo "rimraf not found in root"Repository: MaskingTechnology/jitar
Length of output: 79
🏁 Script executed:
# Check examples/segmentation/package.json current structure
cat examples/segmentation/package.jsonRepository: MaskingTechnology/jitar
Length of output: 706
🏁 Script executed:
# List all example packages to check consistency
fd 'package.json' examples/ -type fRepository: MaskingTechnology/jitar
Length of output: 237
🏁 Script executed:
# Check a few other example packages to see if they include rimraf
for pkg in $(fd 'package.json' examples/ -type f | head -5); do
echo "=== $pkg ==="
grep -E '"rimraf"|"vitest"|"typescript"' "$pkg" || echo "No tooling deps"
doneRepository: MaskingTechnology/jitar
Length of output: 237
🏁 Script executed:
# Check root package.json devDependencies for tooling
cat package.json | jq '.devDependencies | keys[] | select(. == "rimraf" or . == "typescript" or . == "vitest")'Repository: MaskingTechnology/jitar
Length of output: 97
🏁 Script executed:
# Find all package.json files in examples directory
find examples -name "package.json" -type fRepository: MaskingTechnology/jitar
Length of output: 428
🏁 Script executed:
# Check a few other example packages
find examples -name "package.json" -type f | head -3 | while read pkg; do
echo "=== $pkg ==="
jq -r '.devDependencies | keys[]' "$pkg" 2>/dev/null | head -5
doneRepository: MaskingTechnology/jitar
Length of output: 263
🏁 Script executed:
# Show complete root package.json devDependencies
cat package.json | jq '.devDependencies'Repository: MaskingTechnology/jitar
Length of output: 441
Remove rimraf and typescript from devDependencies—these should be hoisted from the root package.json.
The rimraf and typescript tooling dependencies are already defined in the monorepo root and should not be duplicated in individual example packages. Relying on npm hoisting keeps tooling centralized and consistent. The jitar version update (0.10.3 → 0.10.4) is correct since it's a runtime dependency specific to examples.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In examples/segmentation/package.json around line 15, devDependencies include
"rimraf" which (and also "typescript" if present) should be removed because
these tooling deps are hoisted to the monorepo root; delete the rimraf (and
typescript) entries from devDependencies, preserve the updated jitar runtime
dependency, then run an install or update the lockfile to reflect the removal so
the example package relies on the root toolchain.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The examples are not part of the workspace and are not hoisted to the main package.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@basmasking, you're absolutely right—I apologize for the incorrect suggestion. I have a learning that examples are not included in the workspace setup and must declare their own devDependencies directly, but I failed to apply it properly in my review.
The dependency updates in examples/segmentation/package.json are correct as-is:
- ✅
rimraf6.1.0 → 6.1.2 (devDependency) - ✅
typescript5.9.3 (devDependency) - ✅
jitar0.10.4 (runtime dependency)
Since examples are standalone and not hoisted, they need these tooling dependencies explicitly declared. Thank you for the correction!
🧠 Learnings used
Learnt from: basmasking
Repo: MaskingTechnology/jitar PR: 678
File: packages/validation/package.json:16-16
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T19:44:53.054Z
Learning: In the jitar monorepo, standardized tooling dependencies like rimraf, vitest, and typescript are intentionally defined once at the root level package.json and rely on npm hoisting rather than being duplicated in each individual package's package.json file. Package-specific dependencies should be in individual package.json files, but common tooling should be centralized.
Learnt from: basmasking
Repo: MaskingTechnology/jitar PR: 706
File: examples/resources/package.json:11-14
Timestamp: 2025-11-01T12:49:12.253Z
Learning: Examples in the jitar monorepo (files under examples/ directory) are not included in the workspace setup, so npm hoisting does not work for them. Unlike packages, examples must declare their own devDependencies (like rimraf, typescript, etc.) directly in their package.json files.
Learnt from: basmasking
Repo: MaskingTechnology/jitar PR: 678
File: packages/init/templates/jitar-only/package.json:6-6
Timestamp: 2025-07-28T19:38:55.816Z
Learning: In jitar templates (like packages/init/templates/jitar-only/package.json), the jitar build command doesn't produce a .jitar folder. Templates use a jitar.json configuration where both source and target point to "./dist", unlike examples where a .jitar folder may be generated.
| "@rollup/plugin-terser": "0.4.4", | ||
| "@rollup/plugin-typescript": "12.3.0", | ||
| "rollup": "4.53.3", | ||
| "rollup": "4.54.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check rollup 4.54.0 existence and basic info
echo "=== Checking rollup 4.54.0 ==="
npm view rollup@4.54.0 2>/dev/null | head -20
echo -e "\n=== Checking latest 4.x versions ==="
npm view rollup@4 versions --json 2>/dev/null | tail -20Repository: MaskingTechnology/jitar
Length of output: 907
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for security advisories using npm audit for rollup specifically
echo "=== Checking security advisories for rollup 4.54.0 ==="
npm audit --json 2>/dev/null | jq '.vulnerabilities | select(. != null)' || echo "No audit data available"
# Alternative: check npm registry for advisory info
echo -e "\n=== Checking GitHub Security Advisory database ==="
curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/rollup/rollup/security/advisories" 2>/dev/null | jq '.[0:5] | .[].summary' || echo "No GitHub advisories data"Repository: MaskingTechnology/jitar
Length of output: 277
Rollup version update looks good.
The minor version bump from 4.53.3 to 4.54.0 is a conservative update that aligns with the PR objectives. No security advisories detected.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
packages/jitar/package.json around line 51: no code change required for the
Rollup minor bump; keep "rollup": "4.54.0" as-is, run npm install (or pnpm
install/yarn install) to update the lockfile, run the project build/test suite
to verify compatibility, and commit the updated lockfile if it changes.
Fixes #740
Closes #739
Changes proposed in this pull request:
@MaskingTechnology/jitar