Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Optimize domain table sort performance - #372

Draft
yeboster wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-array-sort-optimization-16673082807276696853
Draft

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] Optimize domain table sort performance#372
yeboster wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-array-sort-optimization-16673082807276696853

Conversation

@yeboster

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What: Refactored the handleSort method inside DomainsTable.svelte to remove temporary array destructuring ([aVal, bVal]) and array prototype operations (slice/reverse) within the sort callback, replacing it with direct primitive assignment and mathematical multipliers (1 or -1) for sorting direction.

🎯 Why: When Array.prototype.sort() is called, the callback executes on the order of O(N log N) times. Using array object creation and native prototype methods inside this tight loop creates massive garbage collection overhead that blocks the main thread, especially on slower devices or larger tables.

📊 Impact: Reduces GC pauses and increases the speed of frontend sorting for domains by completely eliminating object allocation during iterations.

🔬 Measurement: Inspect memory allocation timeline during multiple domain list sorts to confirm a reduction in temporary array instances and reduced main thread blocking time.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16673082807276696853 started by @yeboster

Refactored the sorting callback in DomainsTable.svelte to remove
the allocation of temporary arrays and `Array.prototype` methods
on every iteration. Used explicit primitives and math logic
instead to remove GC pressure and improve sorting performance.

Co-authored-by: yeboster <23556525+yeboster@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
app Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 23, 2026 8:10pm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant