Skip to content

docs(brain): refresh Current state; sharpen AG tasks (D cut to one question, add G/H) - #99

Merged
MicBur merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/brain-current-state-refresh
Jul 29, 2026
Merged

MicBur merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/brain-current-state-refresh

Conversation

@MicBur

@MicBur MicBur commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Two commits that were waiting on connectivity.

1. Current state was stale/contradictory β€” it still said the grid was on 0.11.0 awaiting redeploy and never mentioned the biggest behaviour change since: remote preprocessing is ON by default. Now stated with the measured wins (βˆ’42 % client CPU, 3.19Γ— wall-clock), the automatic fallbacks, the SUCO_REMOTE_PREPROCESS=0 escape hatch, and the caveat that it is not in the 0.12.0 binaries. Also fixed an Open-items entry claiming #43 "still needs the worker-side wiring" β€” that landed in #55; narrowed to what's actually left (per-job /tmp isolation).

2. AG tasks sharpened. Asking the full Task D twice hasn't produced the Windows-worker evidence, so it's cut to one unambiguous question: toggle WIN-DEV in, compile one TU, paste the WIN-DEV log β€” does it say Compiling direct RPP job? Yes / No / Can't-run are all stated as acceptable; the only wrong outcome is a βœ… without the log line. Task F reduced the same way. Plus two new tasks matching AG's demonstrated strengths: G installer end-to-end with the new default (an installed client now behaves differently from the 0.12.0 binaries), and H re-run the 101-TU benchmark 3Γ— per mode and report the median before 3.19Γ— becomes a public claim.

Doc-only.

πŸ€– Generated with Claude Code

MicBur and others added 2 commits July 29, 2026 18:20
Two inconsistencies found while re-reading the doc:

- "Current state" still said the grid was on 0.11.0 awaiting redeploy, and did not
  mention the biggest behaviour change since: remote preprocessing (#42) is now ON BY
  DEFAULT. Anyone reading only that section got the wrong picture of how the client
  behaves. Now states it explicitly, with the measured wins (-42% client CPU, 3.19x
  wall-clock on 101 TUs), the automatic fallbacks, the SUCO_REMOTE_PREPROCESS=0 escape
  hatch, and the caveat that it is NOT in the 0.12.0 binaries.
- Open items claimed #43 "still needs the worker-side wiring" β€” that landed in #55, as
  the v1.0.0 section 15 lines above correctly says. Narrowed to what is actually left:
  per-job /tmp isolation.

Same standard the AG status record is held to: a doc that contradicts itself is worse
than one that admits a gap.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Asking the full Task D twice hasn't produced the Windows-worker evidence, so a third
identical ask is unlikely to. Reduced to one unambiguous question: toggle WIN-DEV in,
compile one TU, paste the WIN-DEV log lines β€” does it say "Compiling direct RPP job"
or not. Yes / No / Can't-run are ALL stated as acceptable answers; the only wrong
outcome is a green tick without the log line. Task F reduced the same way (has
SUCOGrid.dll ever loaded in a running VS2022 β€” yes or no).

Adds two tasks that match AG's demonstrated strengths instead of leaving it stuck:
- Task G: installer end-to-end with the NEW default (V3 is on by default, so an
  installed client behaves differently from the 0.12.0 binaries β€” validate the
  artefact users actually get; AG did this well for 0.11.0).
- Task H: re-run the 101-TU benchmark 3x per mode and report the median, so the
  3.19x figure doesn't rest on a single run before it lands on a README.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@MicBur
MicBur merged commit ae87e4d into main Jul 29, 2026
1 check passed
@MicBur
MicBur deleted the docs/brain-current-state-refresh branch July 29, 2026 17:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant