Skip to content

docs: add resource lock restriction to node resource group FAQ#427

Open
tdihp wants to merge 1 commit into
MicrosoftDocs:mainfrom
tdihp:doc/nrg-lock-restriction
Open

docs: add resource lock restriction to node resource group FAQ#427
tdihp wants to merge 1 commit into
MicrosoftDocs:mainfrom
tdihp:doc/nrg-lock-restriction

Conversation

@tdihp
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@tdihp tdihp commented May 20, 2026

Hi.

A.T., the resource locks will cause AKS operation failures, but is not documented. This has been the behavior for years to protect unpexpected locks causing operation failures in-flight. This PR explicitly document not to place locks in FAQ.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping He <pihe@microsoft.com>
@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit bc1fdd6:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
articles/aks/faq.yml ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

@prmerger-automator
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PRMerger Results

Issue Description
Yaml File(s) This PR includes changes to .yml file(s) owned by another author.

@v-regandowner
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@schaffererin

Can you review the proposed changes?

IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

This pull request has been inactive for at least 14 days. If you are finished with your changes, don't forget to sign off. See the contributor guide for instructions.
Get Help
Docs Support Teams Channel
Resolve Merge Conflict

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants