Fixes incremental bug with symmetrical flag.#39
Merged
Conversation
Owner
|
Thank you, I'll make a release right now |
Contributor
Author
|
I appreciate it, and sorry about it all. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Due to sheer incompetence on my part, I added an erroneous i++ to the code parsing the symmetrical flag.
This causes the next argument to be skipped, which can be problematic.
As a temporary workaround, if you're using the --symmetrical argument, I advise adding it to the end of your arguments. (You could theoretically add a dummy argument following --symmetrical, but that might also lead to unintended behavior if you execute supmover with that same command after this has been fixed.